Single center, open and prospective evaluation of genomic sequencing on cerebro-spinal fluid, brain metastatic lesions and plasma from patients in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastasis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13578-e13578
Author(s):  
Chunhua Ma ◽  
Chuoji Huang ◽  
Zhi Li ◽  
Rong Jiang ◽  
Juncheng Zhang

e13578 Background: Leptomeningeal metastases are observed in 9.4% non–small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. Depending on patient specific gene mutations, tumor cells may also have different proliferative activity, leading to differential metastatic potential. However, the clinical significance of observed gene mutation differences between CSF, plasma, primary pulmonary tumor and metastatic brain tumor samples remains unclear and should be further explored. Methods: From Apr. 2018 to Jan. 2019, plasma and CSF paired samples were drawn from consented NSCLC patients with diagnosed brain metastasis. Of these 21, brain lesion samples were obtained from 5 patients. All the samples were tested by next-generation sequencing. Patients were treated based on the detection results. Results: For this cohort, the detection rate of EGFR mutations in CSF cfDNA versus plasma cfDNA/CTC was 57.1% and 23.8% respectively (p < 0.05). For patients who had not received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, the CSF cfDNA EGFR mutation results were consistent with results for plasma, brain lesion and primary tumor samples. Conversely, for patients who had received TKI therapy, EGFR mutations detected in CSF were consistent with those from brain samples, but different from those observed in plasma or primary tumor samples. A high response rate (ORR, 70%; DCR, 90%) was observed in patients with EGFR positive detected in CSF after treatment with second orthird-generation TKI. Among the EGFR mutations detected in CSF, the EGFR uncommon mutation frequency was 58.3%(7/12), including G7I9A/L861Q/L703P/R776H/G575R/T790M 85.7% (6/7) of these occurred in LM patients. One patient who progressed from BM to LM had an uncommon mutation in the CSF sample. Among these five patients with EGFR G719A or L861Q positive and T790M negative, 4 patients had PR and 1 patient had SD after the second-generation TKI therapy. Conclusions: Differences in EGFR gene mutations were observed between CSF, plasma, primary pulmonary lesion and brain tissue samples in NSCLC patients with diagnosed brain metastasis after TKI therapy. The reasons for this discrepancy remain to be understood. Nevertheless, CSF may be a useful prognostic tool for patient monitoring and metastasis risk evaluation. The detection of uncommon EGFR mutations may increase the risk of LM in NSCLC patients. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1800017499.

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii15-iii16
Author(s):  
Raees Tonse ◽  
Muni Rubens ◽  
Haley Appel ◽  
Martin C Tom ◽  
Matthew D Hall ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Novel immunotherapeutic strategies, such as those targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, are promising in patients with metastatic lung cancer and are often administered when tumors show PD-L1 positivity. The objective of this study was to analyze PD-L1 receptor discordance in tumor cell between the primary tumor and lung cancer brain metastasis (LCBM). Methods A systematic review of series published prior to April 2021 obtained from the Medline database of biopsied or resected LCBM evaluating PD-L1 discordance was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates. Results Six full-text articles (n=247 patients) with a median of 32 patients in each study (range: 24–73 patients) reported PD-L1 receptor expression analyses of both primary lung tumors and brain metastases. The majority of patients (81%) were smokers, with 67% non-small cell lung cancer and 33% small cell lung cancer. The pooled estimate for overall PD-LI receptor concordance between primary and LCBM was 76% (95% CI: 52%-90). The positivity rate varied when analyzed by various cutoff levels of PD-L1 expression; for &lt;1% expression, it was 41% (95% CI: 22%-62%) for primary vs. 58% (95% CI: 35%-78%) for LCBM; for PD-L1 expression of 1–50%, it was 24% (95% CI: 13%-40%) vs. 19% (95% CI: 10%-33%); and for PD-L1 &gt;50% it was 12% (95% CI: 4%-33%) vs. 21% (95% CI: 14%-29%) (p=0.425). The pooled estimate for overall PD-LI receptor discordance between primary and LCBM was 17% (95% CI: 10%-27%). Meta-regression analysis showed that age, sex, smoking status, and histology were not associated with PD-LI receptor discordance. Conclusions PD-L1 status discordance in tumor cell occurs in approximately 20% of LCBM, with the greatest discordance in the &lt;1% expression category. Awareness of this discordance is important for the selection of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as well as in the analysis of patterns of failures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20636-e20636
Author(s):  
Wen-Feng Li ◽  
Jin Kang ◽  
Xu-Chao Zhang ◽  
Su Jian ◽  
Huajun Chen ◽  
...  

e20636 Background: Activation of MET oncogene as the result of amplification or activation MET exon 14 mutations represents an emerging molecular target for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. MET exon 14 mutations account for 1.0% in Chinese NSCLC patients. However, few data have been reported on the coexisting of MET exon 14 mutations and EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Moreover, the clinicopathological characteristics and targeted therapy of these MET/ EGFR-coexisting patients remain elusive. Methods: Next-generation sequencing was performed on the DNA of 969 patients and Sanger sequencing was conducted on cDNA of 621 patients for MET exon 14 mutations in NSCLCs. EGFR mutations were determined by direct DNA sequencing. Results: Fifteen patients harbored positive MET exon 14 mutations. Frequency of concomitant EGFR and MET exon 14 mutations was 0.2%(3/1590). 3 patients with concomitant MET exon 14 mutation and EGFR activating mutation were all female, never smokers and adenocarcinoma. Their stagings were stageⅠB (n = 1) and stage Ⅳ(n = 2). The stage ⅠB patient harboring concomitant MET exon 14 skipping and EGFR L858R mutation did not relapse 2 years after operation. The other two stage Ⅳ patients received first-line gefitinib. Case one harbored concomitant MET exon 14 point mutations (IVS13-36G > A) and EGFR exon 19 deletion, and showed resistance to gefitinib with progression free survival(PFS) of 2 weeks and overall survival(OS) of 1 month. Case two had concomitant MET exon 14 point mutations (IVS13-36G > A) and EGFR L858R mutation. Meanwhile, she also had both METamplification and c-Met overexpression at the baseline. She showed partial response (PR) to gefitinib with 3.8 months PFS. Then she was enrolled in a clinical trial (NCT02374645) to receive volitinib plus gefitinib on December 20, 2016. Initial response was good PR on January 24, 2017. Only grade 1 rash was observed. Conclusions: Coexisting MET exon 14 /EGFR mutation is an uncommon molecular event in NSCLC patients. Such coexisted patients might show relative resistance to EGFR inhibitor. However, combination of MET and EGFR inhibitors will be potentially a good strategy to overcome such a relative resistance for MET exon 14 /EGFR co-mutant patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21014-e21014
Author(s):  
Jiangang Ye ◽  
Qi Zhang ◽  
Xing Zhang ◽  
Huijuan Qin ◽  
Minqi Tian

e21014 Background: In targeted therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 30% of NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations develop primary resistance at the beginning of treatment with TKIs. However, the knowledge of primary resistance in early-stage NSCLC patients with EGFR positve remains poorly understood. Methods: Mutations of nine genes that may be related to primary resistance EGFR TKIs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer were chosen through pubmed and other databases including EGFR T790M, EGFR 20ins, PIK3CA, KRAS, BRAF, ERBB2 amplification, MET amplification, PTEN deletion and BCL2L11 deletion. Gene mutations related to primary resistance in patients with early-stage lung cancer (I-IIIA) from the TCGA database were analyzed. Results: According to TCGA database, there were 1089 patients with NSCLC of which 585 were lung adenocarcinoma and 504 lung were squamous cell carcinoma. A number of 46 EGFR-sensitive (19del / L858R) mutations were observed in adenocarcinoma, of which the clinical information of which 44 cases harbored competed clinical information including 39 patients with early stage could be identified as follows,1 patient in stage I, 11 patients in stage IA, 8 patients in stage IB, 7 patients in stage IIA, 4 patients in stage IIB, 8 patients in stage IIIA, 1 patient in stage IIIB and 4 patients in stage IV, respectively. Among the 39 cases of early non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR-sensitive mutations, 2 case of EGFR T790M mutations (5.12%), 2 case of PIK3CA (5.12%), 2 case of BRAF (5.12%), 11 case of MET (DUP) (28.2 %), 8 case of ERBB2 (DUP) (20.5%) and 5 case of PTEN (Del) (12.8%) mutations were observed respectively. Meanwhile, none of primary resistance gene mutations could be found in non-small cell lung squamous cell cancer(0/1). Conclusions: The presence of different mutation frequency in the primary resistance genes associated with EGFR TKIs in patients with early NSCLC was proved. Our study suggested it was necessary for patients to test mutations in primary resistance genes before accepted the adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy using TKIs. As a retrospective study with a relatively small population, the conclusions of this study needed to be verified with a larger sample.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui-chao Li ◽  
Li-jun Zheng ◽  
Ming-hao Fang ◽  
Shi-ying Yu

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of death worldwide. The upregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) due to mutations has been observed in a number of cancers, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib, which specifically target EGFR signaling, have been used to treat NSCLC patients. The presence of EGFR mutations was previously shown to confer sensitivity to TKIs. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between EGFR mutations and response to erlotinib in Chinese NSCLC patients. We recruited 36 patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC who had failed first-line chemotherapy, and treated them with erlotinib. We used immunohistochemistry to determine EGFR expression, and we screened for mutations using PCR analysis. We used Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves for survival analysis. We found that 8 patients had exon 19 mutations, while 3 patients had exon 21 mutations. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) grade of 2 was a significant negative predictor of overall survival (OS). Patients with EGFR mutations showed a significantly better OS compared to those without EGFR mutations. Additionally, multivariate analysis showed that erlotinib-treated stage IV patients had a significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to stage IIIB patients. Patients with EGFR mutations also had a significantly better PFS compared to those without EGFR mutations. The overall remission rate (22.2%) and disease control rate (75%) were significantly higher compared to the rates after second-line chemotherapy (<10%). In conclusion, the presence of EGFR mutations could be a marker to predict the therapeutic efficacy of erlotinib and the prognosis in Chinese NSCLC patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document