Implementation of a brief screening tool to identify needs of cancer survivors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23075-e23075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison L. McDonough ◽  
Yvonne Y. Lei ◽  
Dana Haggett ◽  
Rachel Jimenez ◽  
Katherine T. Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Care Clinic

e23075 Background: Innovation in health care delivery is needed to improve care for cancer survivors. We report a pragmatic study intended to evaluate our experience with adopting screening guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to the routine care of breast cancer survivors in primary care and oncology follow up. Methods: We adapted the NCCN recommended screening questions into a plain language self-administered 1 page intake questionnaire. The tool was administered to a convenience sample of female breast cancer survivors in routine follow-up at an oncology or primary care clinic from September through December 2018. Domains included symptoms, lifestyle concerns, and financial issues. Frequency of concerns was assessed as “never”, “rarely”, “sometimes”, “very frequently” and “always”. We dichotomized results and evaluated feasibility of administration, prevalence of reported symptoms and qualitative assessment of burden as well as utility of the tool among participating clinicians. Results: 165 out of 169 patients offered the questionnaire participated (98%). Office staff provided the questionnaire at routine visits without notable impact on clinic flow. Most commonly endorsed concerns (sometimes or more) were: desire to improve fitness or nutrition (80%), worry about cancer recurrence (72%), and problems with sleep (57%). A majority also reported feeling nervous or worried (55%) and aches or pains in limbs or joints (55%). Several issues known to be underreported in clinic visits were endorsed including lack of satisfaction with sexual function (30% sometimes or more, 12% very often or always) and difficulty remembering things (47% sometimes or more, 13% very often or always). Among 7 participating clinicians, the tool was deemed useful and not burdensome. Several noted that it led to discussing issues that may not otherwise have been addressed. Suggestions included systematically identifying resources and strategies to address common issues and incorporating the tool into the electronic health record to increase utility. Conclusions: Screening for individual needs among survivors is feasible and efficient and may identify prevalent issues that otherwise can be missed in routine survivorship care.

Health after cancer: Early patient experience in a pilot survivorship clinic embedded in primary care.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Marcy Winget ◽  
Siqi WU ◽  
Jennifer Kim ◽  
Cati Brown-Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Expert Knowledge ◽  
Primary Care Clinic ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Care Clinic

180 Background: Prior research has identified barriers to provision of quality survivorship care in primary care settings such as lack of expert knowledge and training, primary care burden and insufficient communication with oncologists. We implemented a survivorship clinic at an academic medical center in the primary care division with the goal of defining the elements required for a seamless transition and co-management. Methods: The primary care physician received training in cancer survivorship based on the ASCO Curriculum, shadowing of 3 breast medical oncologists and 1 gynecologic oncologist, attendance at the 2018 Cancer Survivorship Symposium and NCCN’s Cancer Survivorship Advocacy Meeting. Patients with breast and gynecologic cancers were referred by their oncologists or APP (PA or NP) at various points in their cancer trajectory. Clinical characteristics of patients were abstracted from the electronic medical record and in-depth interviews were conducted with 2 patients. Results: 41 patients attended the survivorship clinic. The majority (88%) were breast (63%) or gynecologic (24%) cancer survivors. Patient age was evenly distributed with 8 age < 46, 11 age 46-59, and 7 age > = 60. 23 (56%) patients had stage < 3 at diagnosis. 21 (51%) had been cancer-free for five years + and 4 were referred by their oncologist to help with patient co-management during cancer treatment. Of the 8 breast cancer patients < 46 years old, 6 had a genetic mutation and 7 were interested in fertility. 15/26 breast cancer patients are currently on endocrine therapy. Interviewed patients expressed appreciation for receiving whole-person care and knowing there is bidirectional communication between clinicians. Conclusions: Cancer survivors are open to and interested in a survivorship visit based in a primary care clinic; this includes both patients who have been cancer-free > 5 years as well as those recently treated with curative intent. Greater efforts are needed to train primary care physicians to deliver survivorship visits that are customized to meet the needs of cancer survivors.

Guideline-concordant surveillance and follow-up care among low-income patients with breast cancer: The role of primary care medical homes.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 171-171
Author(s):  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Racquel Elizabeth Kohler ◽  
Ravi K. Goyal ◽  
Kristen Hassmiller Lich ◽  
Alexis Moore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Medical Homes ◽  
Follow Up Care

171 Background: Community Care of North Carolina (CCNC) initiated an innovative medical home (MH) program in the 1990s to improve primary care in Medicaid-insured populations. CCNC has been successful in improving asthma, diabetes, and cardiovascular outcomes, but has not been evaluated in the context of cancer care. We sought to determine whether MH enrollment was associated with guideline-concordant surveillance and follow-up care among breast cancer survivors. Methods: Using state cancer registry records matched to Medicaid claims, we identified women ages 18-64 diagnosed with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer from 2003-2007 and tracked their CCNC enrollment. Using published American Society for Clinical Oncology breast cancer survivorship guidelines to define our outcomes, we employed multivariate logistic regressions to examine correlates of receipt of surveillance mammogram and at least two physical exams within 15 months post-diagnosis. Results: In total, 840 women were included in our sample. Approximately half were enrolled in a CCNC MH during the study period, 38% were enrolled for more than 7 months post-diagnosis. Enrollment in a MH for at least 7 months post-diagnosis was strongly associated with receiving guideline-recommended surveillance mammogram (p<0.01) and at least 2 physical exams (p<0.01) within 15 months post-diagnosis. Conclusions: Results suggest that MH enrollment is associated with higher quality breast cancer survivorship care among women insured by Medicaid. Given the growing population of cancer survivors and increased emphasis on primary care MH, more research is needed to explore how medical homes can enhance and ensure the provision of guideline-recommended care during cancer survivorship.

Surveillance and beliefs about follow-up care among long-term breast cancer survivors: a comparison of primary care and oncology providers

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betsy C. Risendal ◽  
Rebecca L. Sedjo ◽  
Anna R. Giuliano ◽  
Susan Vadaparampil ◽  
Paul B. Jacobsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Oncology Providers

scholarly journals Adherence to Follow-up Care Guidelines for Breast Cancer Survivors in four Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT study

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary McBride ◽  
Patti Groome ◽  
Li Jiang ◽  
Marlo Whitehead ◽  
Dongdong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Late Effects ◽  
Breast Imaging ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Guideline Compliance ◽  
Follow Up Care ◽  
Canadian Provinces

IntroductionBreast cancer survivors are at risk for late and ongoing problems including cancer recurrence and late effects of treatment. Lack of access to quality follow-up care may affect later mortality, morbidity, and quality of life. This study examines variation in utilization of guideline-based follow-up care separately for four Canadian provinces. Objectives and ApproachFor our retrospective population-based cohort study of breast cancer survivors diagnosed from 2007 to 2010 in British Columbia (BC), 2007-2011 in Manitoba (MB), 2007-2010 in Ontario (ON), and 2007-2012 in Nova Scotia (NS), we linked provincial cancer registries, clinical and health administrative databases, and followed cases alive at 30 months post-diagnosis to five years from diagnosis. For each province, we calculated percent adherence, overuse, and underuse of recommended follow-up care, including surveillance for recurrent and new cancer, surveillance for late effects, and general preventive care. We also examined variation among provinces and over time. ResultsSurvivor numbers were 23,700 (ON), 9493 (BC), 2688 (MB), and 2735 (NS). Annual oncologist visit guideline compliance varied provincially (e.g. Year 2 ON=32.7%, BC=15.0%). For most provinces and follow-up years, the majority of survivors had fewer oncologist visits than recommended.  However, survivors had additional annual breast cancer-related visits to a primary care provider.  Surveillance breast imaging guideline compliance was high (e.g. Year 2, ON=81.1%, MB=72.0%, NS=52.8%, BC =49.7%), with rates declining in ON and MB (to approximately 64%), but increasing in NS and BC (to approximately 58%) by Year 5. Overuse of breast imaging was identified in NS (9.1%-20.7% overuse in follow-up years 2-5).  As per the guideline, 72.9%-79.7% (Years 2-5) of BC survivors had no imaging for metastastic disease, highest among all provinces. Conclusion/ImplicationsProvincial and temporal variations in guideline adherence were identified. Patterns differed by guideline, and both overuse and underuse were observed. These results point to opportunities to improve survivor care and efficiencies in care delivery. In particular, regular care with a primary care physician has been shown to improve follow-up care.

scholarly journals Adherence to follow-up recommendation guidelines in long term breast cancer survivors, a SURBCAN cohort analysis using administrative databases

The Breast ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. S80-S81
Author(s):  
P. Santiá ◽  
A. Jansana ◽  
T. Sanz ◽  
I. de la Cura ◽  
M. Padilla-Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Administrative Databases

scholarly journals Changes in the Semantic Construction of Compassion after the Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) in Women Breast Cancer Survivors

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar González-Hernández ◽  
Daniel Campos ◽  
Rebeca Diego-Pedro ◽  
Rocío Romero ◽  
Rosa Baños ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Semantic Differential ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Treatment As Usual ◽  
Spanish Speaking ◽  
Specific Culture ◽  
Differential Categories

Abstract The growing body of research on compassion has demonstrated its benefits for healthcare and wellbeing. However, there is no clear agreement about a definition for compassion, given the novelty of the research on this construct and its religious roots. The aim of this study is to analyze the mental semantic construction of compassion in Spanish-speaking women breast cancer survivors, and the effects of the Cognitively-Based Compassion Training (CBCT®) on the modification of this definition, compared to treatment-as-usual (TAU), at baseline, post-intervention, and six-month follow-up. Participants were 56 women breast cancer survivors from a randomized clinical trial. The Osgood’s Semantic Differential categories (evaluative, potency, and activity scales) were adapted to assess the semantic construction of compassion. At baseline, participants had an undefined idea about compassion. The CBCT influenced subjects’ semantic construction of what it means to be compassionate. Findings could lead to future investigations and compassion programs that adapt to a specific culture or population.

Mammography Surveillance and Mortality in Older Breast Cancer Survivors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 3001-3006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy L. Lash ◽  
Matthew P. Fox ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
Feifei Wei ◽  
Terry S. Field ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Breast Cancer Mortality ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Early Stage Disease

Purpose There are more than 2,000,000 breast cancer survivors in the United States today. While surveillance for asymptomatic recurrence and second primary is included in consensus recommendations, the effectiveness of this surveillance has not been well characterized. Our purpose is to estimate the effectiveness of surveillance mammography in a cohort of breast cancer survivors with complete ascertainment of surveillance mammograms and negligible losses to follow-up. Patients and Methods We enrolled 1,846 stage I and II breast cancer patients who were at least 65 years old at six integrated health care delivery systems. We used medical record review and existing databases to ascertain patient, tumor, and therapy characteristics, as well as receipt of surveillance mammograms. We linked personal identifiers to the National Death Index to ascertain date and cause of death. We matched four controls to each breast cancer decedent to estimate the association between receipt of surveillance mammogram and breast cancer mortality. Results One hundred seventy-eight women died of breast cancer during 5 years of follow-up. Each additional surveillance mammogram was associated with a 0.69-fold decrease in the odds of breast cancer mortality (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.92). The protective association was strongest among women with stage I disease, those who received mastectomy, and those in the oldest age group. Conclusion Given existing recommendations for post-therapy surveillance, trials to compare surveillance with no surveillance are unlikely. This large observational study provides support for the recommendations, suggesting that receipt of surveillance mammograms reduces the rate of breast cancer mortality in older patients diagnosed with early-stage disease.

scholarly journals How Beneficial is Follow-Up Mammography in Elderly Breast Cancer Survivors?

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3518-3523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen P. Massimino ◽  
Maxine S. Jochelson ◽  
Imelda E. Burgan ◽  
Michelle Stempel ◽  
Monica Morrow
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Breast Cancer Survivors
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document