Prevalence of anemia and compliance to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for workup and treatment of anemia among patients with gynecologic malignancies.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Demetra Hufnagel ◽  
Sumit Mehta ◽  
Chinyere Ezekwe ◽  
Alaina J. Brown ◽  
Lauren S. Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Cancers ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Initial Care ◽  
Absolute Iron Deficiency ◽  
Cancer Network ◽  
Prevalence Of Anemia

32 Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends prompt evaluation of anemic patients with hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 11g/dL. There are a paucity of studies evaluating compliance with the NCCN guidelines. Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of anemia among patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancers and assess compliance with NCCN guidelines. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed and treated with gynecologic cancer at our institution from 2008-2018. Tumor-registry-confirmed cancer cases were identified using ICD codes from the Synthetic Derivative (SD) database which is a de-identified copy of our institution’s electronic medical record. Patients were included if they were between the ages of 18 and 89, had their initial care at our institution, and had a Hb within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Dual primaries were excluded. Anemia was defined as Hb ≤ 11g/dL. Anemia was graded using the CTCAE v.4.0. Absolute and possible iron deficiency were defined by NCCN Guidelines. Results: We identified 1031 patients who met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 61 years (range 20 - 86). The most common malignancy was uterine cancer 509 (49%) followed by ovarian 262 (25%), cervical 133 (13%), vulvar 107 (10%) and vaginal 20 (2%). Of the 1031 patients in our study, 662 (64%) were noted to be anemic within six months of diagnosis. Of these patients 128 (19%) were noted to have grade 1, 309 (47%) grade 2, and 225 (34%) grade 3 anemia. Of those who were anemic, 90 (14%) underwent any workup for anemia, of which 63 (10%) had iron studies performed. Of those with iron studies performed, 7 (1%) patients had absolute iron deficiency and 24 (4%) had possible iron deficiency. Despite the small percentage of individuals with anemia evaluation, 266 (34%) patients received treatment of anemia. Treatments included: oral iron 47 (7%), IV iron 6 (1%), and blood transfusion 213 (32%). Conclusions: Anemia is pervasive among gynecologic cancer patients, but compliance with NCCN guidelines is low. Our data suggest there are opportunities for improvement in evaluation and management of anemia among gynecologic cancers.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Anemia and Compliance With NCCN Guidelines for Evaluation and Treatment of Anemia in Patients With Gynecologic Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-520
Author(s):  
Demetra Hypatia Hufnagel ◽  
Sumit Tushar Mehta ◽  
Chinyere Ezekwe ◽  
Alaina J. Brown ◽  
Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Uterine Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Intravenous Iron ◽  
Hematopoietic Growth Factors ◽  
Folate Supplementation ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Initial Care ◽  
Prevalence Of Anemia

Background: NCCN recommends evaluation and treatment of all patients with cancer who have anemia. Few studies have evaluated the prevalence of anemia among patients with gynecologic cancer and compliance with the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Hematopoietic Growth Factors. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with primary gynecologic cancer between 2008 and 2018. We identified tumor registry–confirmed patients using ICD-O codes from the Synthetic Derivative database, a deidentified copy of Vanderbilt’s electronic medical records. Patients were included if they were between ages 18 and 89 years, received initial care at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and had a hemoglobin measurement within the first 6 months of diagnosis. Anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level ≤11 g/dL and was graded using CTCAE version 5.0. Results: A total of 939 patients met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 60 years. The most common malignancy was uterine cancer. At the time of cancer diagnosis, 186 patients (20%) were noted to have anemia. Within 6 months of diagnosis, 625 patients (67%) had anemia, of whom 200 (32%) had grade 3 anemia and 209 (33%) underwent any evaluation of anemia, including 80 (38%) with iron studies performed. Of the patients with iron studies performed, 7 (9%) had absolute iron deficiency and 7 (9%) had possible functional iron deficiency. Among those with anemia within 6 months of diagnosis, 260 (42%) received treatment for anemia, including blood transfusion (n=205; 79%), oral iron (n=57; 22%), intravenous iron (n=8; 3%), vitamin B12 (n=37; 14%), and folate supplementation (n=7; 3%). Patients with ovarian cancer were significantly more likely to have anemia and undergo evaluation and treatment of anemia. Conclusions: Anemia is pervasive among patients with gynecologic cancer, but compliance with the NCCN Guidelines is low. Our data suggest that there are opportunities for improvement in the evaluation and management of anemia.

Compliance with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for evaluation and treatment of anemia among patients with solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Demetra Hufnagel ◽  
Lia Manfredi Bos ◽  
Alaina J. Brown ◽  
Lauren S. Prescott
Keyword(s):  
Iron Deficiency ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Folate Deficiency ◽  
Normocytic Anemia ◽  
Tumor Registry ◽  
Functional Iron Deficiency ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Cancer Network ◽  
Prevalence Of Anemia

11 Background: Anemia is associated with increased morbidity, mortality and decreased quality of life among oncology patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends evaluation and treatment of anemia in patients with cancer. There is a paucity of data investigating compliance with the NCCN guidelines. Methods: A retrospective study of patients diagnosed with any malignant solid tumor at our institution from 2008-2017 was performed. Tumor-registry-confirmed cancer cases were identified using International Classification of Disease-Oncology (ICD-O) codes in the Synthetic Derivative (SD) database, a de-identified copy of the electronic medical record. Patients were included if they were between the ages of 18 and 89 and had a hemoglobin (hgb) within 6 months of diagnosis. Patients were excluded if they had more than one tumor registry entry. Anemia was defined as hgb ≤11g/dL and graded using the CTCAE v.5.0. Absolute and possible functional iron deficiency were defined by NCCN guidelines. B12 and folate deficiency were defined by institutional reference values. Chi-squared tests were conducted in R (Version 3.4.4). P <.05 was interpreted as statistically significant. Results: A total of 25,018 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 60 years, and the most common malignancies were respiratory tract, prostate, and urologic (11% each, respectively). Of the 25,018 patients, 1,484 (17%) were noted to be anemic at time of diagnosis and 11,019 (44%) were anemic within 6 months of diagnosis. Of these patients, a plurality (N = 4,686, 43%) had grade 2 anemia and a majority (N = 9,623, 87%) had normocytic anemia. Patients with retroperitoneal/peritoneal cancers had the highest prevalence of anemia (N = 83, 75%). A total of 4,125 (37%) underwent any evaluation of their anemia, of which 1,742 (16%) had iron studies performed and 1,528 (14%) had B12 or folate studies performed. Of those with iron studies performed, 197 (11%) patients had absolute iron deficiency and 103 (6%) had possible functional iron deficiency. Of those with B12 labs, 74 (5%) had B12 deficiency and of those with folate labs, 69 (12%) had folate deficiency. Less than half of anemic patients (N = 4,318, 39%) received treatment for anemia, including blood transfusion (N = 3,528, 32%), oral iron (N = 1,279, 12%), or IV iron (N = 97, 1%). However, treatment of anemia significantly increased as grade of anemia increased (any treatment among mild: 12%; moderate: 31%; severe: 77%; χ2 [2, N = 11,019] = 3020.6; P <.001). Patients with male reproductive tract cancers had the highest prevalence of anemia evaluation (N = 57, 79%). Conclusions: Anemia is common in patients with solid tumors, yet compliance with NCCN guidelines for evaluation and treatment of anemia remains low. There are opportunities to improve compliance with NCCN guidelines for management of anemia across the spectrum of cancer care.

Level of Scientific Evidence Underlying Recommendations from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hematologic Malignancies: Are We Moving Forward?

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 32-32
Author(s):  
Aakash Desai ◽  
Harry E Fuentes ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Caleb J Scheckel ◽  
Thejaswi Poonacha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽  
Practice Guidelines ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Therapeutic Recommendations ◽  
Cancer Network

Background: National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines are the most comprehensive and widely used standard for clinical care in malignant hematology by clinicians and payers in the US. The level of scientific evidence in NCCN guidelines for malignant hematological conditions has not been recently investigated. We describe the distribution of categories of evidence and consensus (EC) among the 10 most common hematologic malignancies with regard to recommendations for staging, initial and salvage therapy, and surveillance. Methods: NCCN uses a system of guideline development distinct from other major professional organizations. The NCCN definitions for EC are: category I, high level of evidence such as randomized controlled trials with uniform consensus; category IIA, lower level of evidence with uniform consensus; category IIB, lower level of evidence without a uniform consensus but with no major disagreement; and category III, any level of evidence but with major disagreement. We compared our results with previously published results from 2011 guidelines. Results: Total recommendations increased by 16.6% from 1160 (2011) to 1353 (2020). Of the 1353 recommendations, Category 1, 2A, 2B and 3 EC were 5%, 91%, 4%, 1% while in 2011 they were 3%, 93%, 4% and 0% respectively. Recommendations with category 1 EC were found in all guidelines, except for Burkitt's Lymphoma. 6.3% of therapeutic recommendations were category 1 EC with the majority (56.4%) pertaining to initial therapy. Guidelines with highest proportions of therapeutic recommendations with category 1 EC were Multiple Myeloma (12.4%), CLL/SLL (6.9%) and AML (5.6%). Between 2011 and 2020, the proportion of category I recommendations increased significantly only in Follicular lymphoma and CLL/SLL. No category 1 EC recommendations existed in staging or surveillance. Conclusion: Recommendations issued in the 2020 NCCN guidelines are largely developed from lower levels of evidence but with uniform expert opinion. Despite the major advances in hematology in the past decade, this is largely unchanged. Our study underscores the urgent need and available opportunities to expand the current evidence base in malignant hematological disorders which forms the platform for clinical practice guidelines. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The Costs of Drugs Used to Treat Myelodysplastic Syndromes Following National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 942-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Greenberg ◽  
Leon E. Cosler ◽  
Salvatore A. Ferro ◽  
Gary H. Lyman
Keyword(s):  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Myelodysplastic Syndromes ◽  
Iron Chelation ◽  
International Prognostic Scoring System ◽  
Limited Attention ◽  
Recombinant Erythropoietin ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Transfusion Requirements ◽  
Average Annual Cost ◽  
Cancer Network

Guidelines for management of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have been generated by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Myelodysplastic Syndromes Panel. Because MDS is a heterogeneous spectrum of disorders, these patients have been categorized into prognostic subgroups, predominantly using the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). Several drugs have been used to treat these patients, and their selection and sequential recommended use by the panel depend on disease characteristics and responses to treatment. Recombinant erythropoietin alfa and darbepoetin alfa have been the mainstay of therapy for treating anemia associated with MDS. The FDA has recently approved several other drugs for treating MDS, including azacytidine and decitabine for all stages of disease, lenalidomide for low-risk anemic patients with del(5q) chromosomal abnormality, and deferasirox for treating iron overload. For iron chelation, deferoxamine is also used occasionally. Treatment with immunosuppressive therapy (antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin) has been therapeutically beneficial for a subset of younger patients with MDS. Because the financial cost of these therapies are substantial and have received only limited attention, this article evaluates the costs of specific drugs and their sequential use in the lower-risk IPSS (low and intermediate-1) subgroups based on the NCCN guidelines. Results estimate an average annual cost for potentially anemia-altering drugs of $63,577 per patient, ranging from $26,000 to $95,000, depending on the specific therapies. In patients for whom the therapies fail, annual costs for iron chelation plus red blood cell transfusions are estimated to average $41,412. The economic impact of drug therapy should be weighed against the patient's potential for improvement in clinical outcomes, quality of life, and transfusion requirements.

Compliance with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for antiemesis in cisplatin regimens.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 280-280
Author(s):  
Terri P. Wolf ◽  
Dana Ann Little
Keyword(s):  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Adherence Rate ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Guideline Compliance ◽  
Cancer Network ◽  
The Impact

280 Background: The members of a network of community cancer centers affiliated with an academic medical center report following National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. To determine guideline compliance, cisplatin regimens were audited. Cisplatin was selected because of its wide use, high emetic potential, and the impact on QOL for patients with unmanaged nausea and vomiting.The community cancer centers affiliated with an academic medical center report following National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for treatment plans. To determine guideline compliance rates, cisplatin regimens were audited. Cisplatin was selected because of its wide use, high emetic potential, and the impact on QOL for patients with unmanaged nausea and vomiting. Methods: Prior to a chart audit, medical oncologists were surveyed on their knowledge of NCCN antiemesis guidelines, frequency of prescribing based on guidelines, and reasons for not using guidelines. Auditors identified patient charts through billing records and reviewed cycle 1 day 1 orders of cisplatin regimens. Secondary data was collected on hydration orders and home medications for antiemesis. Results: Guideline adherence varied from 0% to 76% with overall adherence at 28%. Dexamethasone doses ranged from 2-20 mg (guideline 12 mg) as did serotonin antagonists (5HT3) ordered at higher IV doses of 24-32 mg (guideline 8-16 mg). Conclusions: Although cancer centers report following the guidelines, this study did not find consistent adherence. The cancer center with the highest adherence rate works closely with a pharmacist and has built order sets with the guidelines. One cancer center had wide variances among practitioners. The variances increase the potential for error. The cancer center with lowest adherence rate used 10 mg doses of dexamethasone because the drug is delivered in 10 mg vials. This study identified multiple systems issues impacting guideline compliance. Managing nausea and vomiting is important for patient QOL and to manage costs by decreasing hospitalizations, treatment delays, and nutritional deficits. Understanding prescribing habits relative to guidelines provides an opportunity to change practice and reduce variability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document