Statin use is associated with a lower risk of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13585-e13585
Author(s):  
Ben Ponvilawan ◽  
Nipith Charoenngam ◽  
Patompong Ungprasert

e13585 Background: Statin use is associated with decreased risk of several types of cancer such as hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer and hematologic malignancy, although the data on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is still inconclusive. The current systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to summarize all available data on this association. Methods: A systematic review was performed using EMBASE and MEDLINE database from inception to October 2019 with search strategy that included terms for “statin” and “DLBCL”. Eligible studies could be either cohort or case-control studies that reported the association between statin use and risk of DLBCL. Eligible cohort studies must include patients with history of statin use and comparators with no history of statin use, then follow them for incident DLBCL and report the relative risk, hazard risk ratio, or standardized incidence ratio and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing the incidence of DLBCL between the two groups. Eligible case-control studies must include cases with DLBCL and controls without DLBCL, then search for prior statin use and report the odds ratio and associated 95% CI for this association. Point estimates along with standard errors were extracted and combined together for the calculation of the pooled effect estimate using the random effect, generic inverse variance method. Results: A total of 1,139 articles were identified using the search strategy. Six studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included into the meta-analysis. Statin use was associated with a significantly reduced risk of DLBCL with the pooled relative risk of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 – 0.88; I2 = 70%). Funnel plot was fairly symmetric and was not suggestive of presence of publication bias. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that patients with history of statin use had a significantly lower risk of DLBCL compared to individuals without history of statin use.

Author(s):  
Carla Isabelly Rodrigues‐Fernandes ◽  
Lucas Guimarães Abreu ◽  
Raghu Radhakrishnan ◽  
Danyel Elias da Cruz Perez ◽  
Gleyson Kleber Amaral‐Silva ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2615-2615
Author(s):  
James R. Cerhan ◽  
Zachary S. Fredericksen ◽  
Mark Liebow ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
Thomas E. Witzig ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Inhibitors of HMG-CoA reductase (“statins”) are effective in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. Preclinical data from rodents suggested that they may increase the incidence of some cancers, including lymphoma. However, monitoring of randomized trials in humans have generally found decreased cancer risks, and these findings have been supported by a growing number of observational studies, including three recent reports of a protective association in NHL. The suggested anti-carcinogenic mechanisms for statins include their impact on inflammatory (including a shift from a Th1 to Th2 profile) and angiogenesis pathways, as well as the induction of apoptosis by modulation of signaling pathways, all of which are of biologic relevance in NHL. Methods: We evaluated the history of statin use and risk of NHL in a clinic-based study of 243 newly diagnosed NHL cases and 499 frequency matched controls enrolled at the Mayo Clinic from 2002-2005. Risk factor data were collected using self-administered questionnaires, and included history of use of cholesterol lowering drugs two or more years before diagnosis (for cases) or enrollment (for controls); specific drug names were not available. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age, gender, and residence. NHL subtypes were centrally reviewed, and subtype-specific risks were estimated using polychotomous logistic regression. Results. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.5 years for cases and 55% were men; among controls, the mean age at enrollment was 61.8 years and 54% were men. Twenty-one percent of the cases reported ever using statins compared to 30% of the controls, supporting a lower risk of NHL for ever users (OR=0.69; 95% CI 0.47–1.00). The lowest risk was seen for the longest users; i.e., compared to never users, person who had 10 or more years of use had the greatest reduction in risk (OR=0.52; 95% CI 0.24–1.10). A history of high cholesterol was also inversely associated with risk of NHL (OR=0.72; 95% CI 0.55–0.93). However, the association for the type of treatment for cholesterol lowering varied. Those who were medically treated had inverse association with risk of NHL (OR=0.63; 95% CI 0.46–0.86), while the no treatment and dietary change only groups were found to have no association with risk. The reduction in NHL risk with medical treatment was specific to statin use, as the use of other cholesterol lowering drugs was not associated with risk (OR=1.13; 95% CI 0.50–2.57). These results were not confounded by education, family history of NHL, body mass index, cigarette smoking or alcohol use. In subtype analysis, the inverse association was seen for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (OR=0.27; 95% CI 0.08–0.90), but not for CLL/SLL or follicular NHL. Conclusions. Statin use was associated with a lower risk of developing NHL, particular diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.


2015 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhong Hu ◽  
Chao Deng ◽  
Wen Zou ◽  
Guangsen Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Wang

Background: The current standard therapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). The role of radiotherapy (RT) after complete response (CR) to RCHOP in patients with DLBCL remains unclear. This systematic review with a meta-analysis is an attempt to evaluate this role. Methods: Studies that evaluated RT versus no-RT after CR to RCHOP for DLBCL patients were searched in databases. Hazard ratios (HR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: A total of 4 qualified retrospective studies (633 patients) were included in this review. The results suggested that RT improved overall survival (OS; HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.77) and progression-free/event-free survival (PFS/EFS; HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.11-0.50) in all patients compared with no-RT. In a subgroup analysis of patients with stage III-IV DLBCL, RT improved PFS/EFS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.51) and local control (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.44), with a trend of improving OS (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12-1.05). Conclusion: Consolidation RT could significantly improve outcomes of DLBCL patients who achieved a CR to RCHOP. However, the significance of these results was limited by these retrospective data. Further investigation of the role of consolidation RT in the rituximab era is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document