POF (paclitaxel/oxaliplatin/5-FU/leucovorin) versus SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX as a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for curatively resected stage III gastric cancer: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial, FNF-014 trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4647-TPS4647
Author(s):  
Liyu Su ◽  
Chunxiang Li ◽  
Feng Huang ◽  
Lu chuan Chen ◽  
Lisheng Cai ◽  
...  

TPS4647 Background: Postoperative chemotherapy (S-1, CAPOX, or Docetaxel/S-1) is a standard treatment for stage II/III gastric cancer in Asia. With regard to single agent or doublet, the need for improvement has consistently been pointed out because of the relatively poor outcome for patients with stage III gastric cancer. Triplet (FLOT) has shown significant survival benefits in perioperative setting. POF, our regiment similar to FLOT, demonstrated priority to doublet (FOLFOX) in advanced setting (2019 ASCO-GI). We conducted a randomized, multicenter, phase III study to compare triplet to doublet regimens for patients with stage III gastric cancer. Methods: This is currently enrolling patients (n = 544) with pathologic stage III gastric cancer after D2 lymph node dissection. Patients are randomized 1:1 and stratified by tumor stage (IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC, AJCC 8th) into POF or SOX/CAPOX/FOLFOX (chosen by the clinicians). SOX: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral S-1 80mg/m2 divided by two on days 1 to 14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. CAPOX: oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1, oral capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 14 every 21 days for 8 cycles. FOLFOX: oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, levo-leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on day 1, then 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours, every 14 days for 12 cycles. Three doublets were chosen by the clinicians. POF: paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, followed by FOLFOX omitted 5-FU bolus, every 14 days for 12 cycles. Eligibility criteria: patients aged 18-70 years, primary histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma (including adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction) of stage III with no evidence of metastatic disease, R0 resection with D2 lymph node dissection, good performance status (ECOG PS ≤1). Subjects must be able to take orally, and without other concomitant medical conditions that required treatment, initially treated with curative surgery followed by chemotherapy within 42 days. Life expectancy estimated more than 6 months. Adequate organ function. All patients provided written informed consent prior to treatment. Key exclusion criteria: patients with other primary malignancies, gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary end point is 3-year disease-free survival. Secondary end points are 3-year overall survival, 5-year overall survival, 5-year disease-free survival, and adverse events. Clinical trial information: NCT03788226 .

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 1150-1156
Author(s):  
Won Kyung Cho ◽  
Yeon Joo Kim ◽  
Hakyoung Kim ◽  
Young Seok Kim ◽  
Won Park

Abstract Objective This study investigated the effect of para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection in recently revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIIC1p cervical cancer treated with primary surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the records of 343 patients with early-stage cervical cancer and pathologically proven pelvic lymph node metastasis following curative surgery from 2001 to 2014. No patient had imaging evidence of para-aortic lymph node involvement, and all patients received adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy. We investigated the significance of para-aortic lymph node sampling or dissection on disease-free survival and overall survival. Results After median follow-up of 58.3 months, 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival in all patients were 69.9 and 80.2%, respectively. Disease-free survival and overall survival did not differ between the para-aortic lymph node dissection group and the No para-aortic lymph node dissection group (P = 0.700 and P = 0.605). However, patients with para-aortic lymph node-positive disease had poorer disease-free survival and overall survival compared with those with para-aortic lymph node-negative disease (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Conclusions This study found no survival benefit of para-aortic lymph node evaluation among patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics IIIC1p cervical cancer who were clinically para-aortic lymph node-negative. Although para-aortic lymph node metastasis is a poor prognosticator, the benefit of para-aortic lymph node dissection in terms of survival needs further investigation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-121
Author(s):  
Sandrie Mariella Mac ◽  
Ashish Bahadur Malla

For many decades, D2 procedure has been accepted in the far-east as the standard treatment for both early (EGC) and advanced gastric cancer (AGC). In case of AGC, the debate on the extent of nodal dissection has been open for many years in order to highlight the safety and efficacy of treatment, hence this study. A comprehensive literature research was performed in PubMed to identify studies that compared laparoscopic- assisted gastrectomy (LAG) and open gastrectomy (OG) with D2 lymph node dissection (D2-LND) for treatment of AGC for the last five years. Data of interest were checked and subjected to meta-analysis with RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Overall, 19 studies were included in this meta-analysis. LG had some advantages over OG, including shorter hospitalization (WMD -2.31; 95% CI -4.09 to -0.53; P = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD -120.49; 95% CI -174.27 to -66.71; P < 0.01), faster bowel recovery (WMD -0.55; 95% CI -0.86 to -0.24; P ˂ 0.01) and earlier ambulation (WMD -0.75; 95% CI -1.38 to -0.11; P = 0.02). In terms of surgical and oncological safety, LG could achieve similar lymph nodes (WMD, -0.94, 95% CI, -2.95 to 1.06; P=0.36), a lower complication rate [odds ratio (OR)=0.80; 95%CI, 0.68-0.97; P=0.02], and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) comparable to OG. In conclusion, for AGCs both techniques (LAG and OG) appeared comparable in short- and long-term results. More time was needed to perform LAG; nonetheless, it had some advantages in achieving faster postoperative recovery over OG. In order to clarify this controversial issue ongoing trials and future studies are needed.


1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 3810-3815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lluís Cirera ◽  
Anna Balil ◽  
Eduard Batiste-Alentorn ◽  
Ignasi Tusquets ◽  
Teresa Cardona ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer is controversial. We conducted a phase III, randomized, multicentric clinical trial with the goal of assessing the efficacy of the combination of mitomycin plus tegafur in prolonging the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with resected stage III gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected stage III gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned, using sealed envelopes, to receive either chemotherapy or no further treatment. Chemotherapy was started within 28 days after surgery according to the following schedule: mitomycin 20 mg/m2 intravenously (bolus) at day 1 of chemotherapy; 30 days later, oral tegafur at 400 mg bid daily for 3 months. Disease-free survival and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Between January 1988 and September 1994, 148 patients from 10 hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, were included in the study. The median follow-up period was 37 months. The tolerability of the treatment was excellent. The overall survival and disease-free survival were higher in the group of patients treated with chemotherapy (P = .04 for survival and P = .01 for disease-free survival in the log-rank test). The overall 5-year survival rate and the 5-year disease-free survival rate were, respectively, 56% and 51% in the treatment group and 36% and 31% in the control group. CONCLUSION: Our positive results are consistent with the results of recent studies; which conclude that there is a potential benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected gastric cancer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 185 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Simone ◽  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Mariaconsiglia Ferriero ◽  
Salvatore Guaglianone ◽  
Cristina Falavolti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Peiyu Li ◽  
Xin Wu ◽  
Shaoyou Xia ◽  
Xudong Zhao ◽  
...  

Objective. Gastric cancer is a malignant tumor originating from gastric mucosal epithelium. Here, we aimed to investigate the analysis of the threshold change of gastric cancer tumor mutation burden (TMB) and its relationship with the prognosis of patients. Methods. 256 patients with gastric cancer were selected as subjects. All patients were in the advanced stage and received surgical resection of D2 lymph node dissection. After the operation, a follow-up was performed for 24 months, and the disease-free survival and overall survival of patients were counted. The NGS molecular biological was detected to obtain gastric cancer tumor mutation burden (TMB) data. Pearson correlation analysis software was used to analyze the correlation between TMB threshold and disease-free survival or overall survival of patients with gastric cancer, and the multivariate logistic analysis was performed as well. Results. The disease-free survival period and the overall survival period of patients in the low-to-medium TMB group were both longer than those in the high TMB group. Pearson correlation analysis results showed that the TMB threshold was negatively correlated with the disease-free survival and overall survival of gastric cancer patients. Results from multivariate logistic analysis showed that high TMB thresholds have a greater impact on disease-free survival and overall survival of patients, but the impact of medium and low TMB thresholds on disease-free survival and overall survival of patients is weakened. Conclusions. The TMB threshold level has a predictive effect on the effect of surgical resection of D2 lymph node dissection, and high levels of TMB can significantly affect disease-free survival and overall survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeeyun Lee ◽  
Do Hoon Lim ◽  
Sung Kim ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
Joon Oh Park ◽  
...  

Purpose The ARTIST (Adjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy in Stomach Cancer) trial was the first study to our knowledge to investigate the role of postoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy in patients with curatively resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection. This trial was designed to compare postoperative treatment with capecitabine plus cisplatin (XP) versus XP plus radiotherapy with capecitabine (XP/XRT/XP). Patients and Methods The XP arm received six cycles of XP (capecitabine 2,000 mg/m2 per day on days 1 to 14 and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks) chemotherapy. The XP/XRT/XP arm received two cycles of XP followed by 45-Gy XRT (capecitabine 1,650 mg/m2 per day for 5 weeks) and two cycles of XP. Results Of 458 patients, 228 were randomly assigned to the XP arm and 230 to the XP/XRT/XP arm. Treatment was completed as planned by 75.4% of patients (172 of 228) in the XP arm and 81.7% (188 of 230) in the XP/XRT/XP arm. Overall, the addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0862). However, in the subgroup of patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis at the time of surgery (n = 396), patients randomly assigned to the XP/XRT/XP arm experienced superior DFS when compared with those who received XP alone (P = .0365), and the statistical significance was retained at multivariate analysis (estimated hazard ratio, 0.6865; 95% CI, 0.4735 to 0.9952; P = .0471). Conclusion The addition of XRT to XP chemotherapy did not significantly reduce recurrence after curative resection and D2 lymph node dissection in gastric cancer. A subsequent trial (ARTIST-II) in patients with lymph node–positive gastric cancer is planned.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 160-160
Author(s):  
Kabsoo Shin ◽  
In-Ho Kim

160 Background: The aim of this study is to compare capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) with S-1 based on disease-free survival, and to define the clinical impact of lymph node ratio to select a regimen. Methods: Patients who had curative resection and received either S-1 or XELOX as adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer between Jan. 2011 and Dec. 2015, were analyzed using propensity score matching (PSM). Of the 412 patients enrolled, 301 received S-1 and 111 received XELOX and after PSM, the sample size of each group was 111 patients. And the groups were classified according to stage and lymph node ratio (0, > 0-0.1, > 0.1-025, > 0.25) and three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated. Results: In post-PSM analysis of all 222 patients, The three-year DFS rates in XELOX group was higher than in the S-1 group in all stage 3 (78% vs. 66.1%, p = 0.036), stage IIIC (64.1% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.038) and LNR > 0.25 (67.7.1% vs. 26.1%, p = 0.002). The hazard ratio of XELOX for recurrence compared with S-1 for stage IIIC and LNR > 0.25 was respectively 0.479 (95% CI 0.238~0.985, p = 0.046) and 0.351 (95% CI 0.162~0.758, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Adjuvant XELOX was more effective than S-1 for stage IIIC and LNR > 0.25 in gastric cancer after D2 dissection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document