Bosutinib in combination with pemetrexed in patients with selected metastatic solid tumors: A phase I study (NCT03023319).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3022-3022
Author(s):  
Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim ◽  
Mahran Shoukier ◽  
Ihab Eldessouki ◽  
Ahmed Khaled ◽  
John Morris
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3022 Background: Activation of the Src kinase pathway has been observed in about 50% of cancers of the colon, liver, lung, breast and pancreas. Ceppi, et al, explored that Src inhibitors might be synergistic in combination with pemetrexed. Bosutinib is an approved oral ATP-competitive Bcr-Abl tyrosine-kinase inhibitor with an inhibitory effect on Src kinases. Methods: In this phase 1, dose-escalation study, we enrolled 10 patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors who progressed on standard of care chemotherapy, 9 of whom were evaluable, to receive bosutinib and pemetrexed. Bosutinib was administered once daily in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation study design where the first cohort started at an oral dose of 200 mg daily with I.V. pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 on a three weekly schedule. The primary objective was to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bosutinib with pemetrexed, and the type and frequency of adverse events. Secondary objective(s) were to estimate tumor response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: All patients had progressed on prior chemotherapy and included 9 patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung, and 1 patient with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the appendix. Two patients (22%) had prior pemetrexed exposure. Median age was 62 years (range, 58-44). The median number of bosutinib and pemetrexed cycles received was 2 (range, 1-4). Nine patients were evaluable. The MTD of bosutinib was 300 mg daily in this combination as 2 out of the 3 patients who received 400 mg experienced elevated liver transaminases (>CTCAE Grade 3) and one patient experienced grade 3 fatigue. Two patients (22%) had a partial response, and 6 patients (67%) had stable disease, including 2 patients with prior pemetrexed exposure, and 1 patient had disease progression. The two responders and the subject with the longest stable disease duration demonstrated Src overexpression on immunohistochemical staining of their tumor. Two patients died of sepsis; both had stable disease. Median PFS was 4.1 months (range, 1.2-11.6), and the median OS was 11.9 months (range, 4-36.7). Adverse events included pneumonia/sepsis, diarrhea, fatigue, rash, weakness, transaminitis, hypertension, and thrombocytopenia. Conclusions: The MTD of oral bosutinib was 300 mg daily in combination with pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Despite the limitations of this phase I study there appears potential efficacy of this combination in pretreated patients. We are currently enrolling patients in the expansion cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT03023319.

Phase I study of BPM 31510 in advanced solid tumors: Updated analysis of a novel treatment with promising activity.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3015-3015
Author(s):  
Andrew Eugene Hendifar ◽  
Sant P. Chawla ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Victoria S Chua ◽  
Lita Fernandez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Grade 3

3015 Background: BPM 31510 is a novel small molecule that targets the metabolic machinery of the cancer microenvironment to reverse the aerobic glycolytic phenotype of cancer cells. Effector downstream signaling results in re-capitulation of BCL-2 mediated apoptosis and disruption in tumor vasculature by modulation of VEGF. (NR Narain et al., Proceedings of AACR Meeting Abstracts 2011). Methods: A standard 3+3 phase I, dose-escalation study design was used in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard treatment. Primary objectives were establishment of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and safety/pharmacokinetic (PK) correlates. Secondary objectives included exploratory pharmacodynamics (PD) and preliminary efficacy (RECIST-1.1) of BPM 31510 in sequential cohorts of 3 to 6 pts. Results: At time of submission, 34 patients with advanced cancer who had failed multiple chemotherapeutic regimens had been enrolled in 7 dose cohorts (ranging from 5.6 mg/kg to 78.2 mg/kg). Patients received a median of 2 cycles (1-7). 2 patients have had grade 3 elevation in PT/INR, otherwise there have been no grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities to date. The pharmacokinetics of BPM 31510 are linear and there were no sex differences in the parameters normalized by dose and body surface area. Tmax and Cmax are associated with the end of the infusion. The values for t1/2 ranged from 2.18 to 13.3 hr, with little or no dependence of t1/2 on dose. Objective tumor responses have been noted at the dose of 58.6mg/kg with 1 partial response (myxoid liposarcoma) and 1 minor response (pleomorphic sarcoma). Six patients (19%) have had disease stabilization (> 4 months). Conclusions: Interim data from this phase I study indicate that BPM 31510 is well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities to date. A partial response and minor response were observed and correlates with dose escalation. Taken together, there is strong rationale for further clinical development of this compound as an anti-cancer agent.

Phase I study of the combination of alisertib (MLN8237) and gemcitabine in advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3589-3589
Author(s):  
Jasmine Huynh ◽  
Justin Chen ◽  
Edward Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
David R. Gandara ◽  
Thomas John Semrad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Expansion Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

3589 Background: Aurora Kinase A (AKA) is a key mitotic regulator overexpressed in multiple solid tumors. This open-label dose escalation and expansion phase I study evaluated the safety and tolerability of alisertib (MLN8237), an oral AKA inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine. Methods: In dose escalation, patients (pts) > 18y with refractory solid tumors received 28-day cycles of gemcitabine on days 1, 8, 15 and alisertib twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17. Gemcitabine was given at 1000mg/m2. Four dose levels (DL) of alisertib (20-50mg) were given per 3+3 design to investigate dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in cycle 1, to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In dose expansion, advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma pts received the MTD dose twice daily on a modified dosing schedule to allow for pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation. Anti-tumor activity was assessed by response rate (RECIST 1.1) and progression-free survival (PFS). PK evaluation of plasma gemcitabine and alisertib was performed on all pts enrolled in the dose expansion. PK sampling was performed before treatment, immediately after gemcitabine infusion, and at other pre-specified post-infusion timepoints. Results: Twenty-six pts were treated in total: 21 pts in dose escalation and 5 pts in dose expansion. Overall, median age was 57y [42-82]; 50% male; 62% PS 1 (16 pts); 2 [0-7] median prior therapies. In the dose escalation phase, 9 tumor types were included and NSCLC was most common (7 pts). Maximum administered dose (DL4) achieved 900 mg alisertib per cycle and was tolerated (1 DLT in 6 pts). The dose expansion phase enrolled 5 pts with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; median age 63y [48-82]; 60% male; 60% PS 1 (3 pts); 2 [1-2] median prior therapies. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were observed in 73% of all pts and were predominantly hematologic, including neutropenia (54%), leukopenia (50%), and lymphopenia (31%). Similar TRAEs were seen at DL4; all 14 pts experienced neutropenia with 64% experiencing grade ≥3 neutropenia. Fourteen of 23 evaluable pts (61%) had stable disease and 2 pts (9%) had partial response (PR) as best overall response. Median PFS was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.0-4.2). Analysis of PK data is ongoing and will be reported. Conclusions: Alisertib can be safely administered with gemcitabine. RP2D for alisertib is 50 mg PO BID in combination with full dose gemcitabine. Best response was at least stable disease in a majority of pts with PR observed in 9% of this heavily pretreated group of patients. Most grade ≥3 TRAEs were hematologic. Results of PK studies will also be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT01924260 .

Phase I study of daily administration of MGCD265 to patients with advanced malignancies (Study 265–101)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14525-e14525 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. K. Kollmannsberger ◽  
H. Hurwitz ◽  
G. Vlahovic ◽  
C. Maroun ◽  
J. Dumouchel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Daily Administration ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Label Dose ◽  
Grade 3

e14525 Background: MGCD265 is a novel multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor that targets the mesenchymal epithelial transition (c-Met) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors (VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3). Additional RTK targets include Tie-2, and Ron. Those kinases are known to be involved in tumor development and angiogenesis. The objective of this Phase I study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of daily administration of MGCD265 in patients with solid tumors. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, dose escalation study of oral MGCD265 administered as a continuous 21-day cycle. Cohorts of 3–4 patients were enrolled per dose level, initially with dose doubling between cohorts, followed by smaller increments once grade 2 drug-related toxicity is observed. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade 4 neutropenia; grade 4 thrombocytopenia; any > grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity; severe/sustained hypertension; or any toxic effect leading to a patient missing > 4 doses of MGCD265. Treatment would continue until disease progression or toxicity. Results: Ten patients with advanced solid tumors have been treated. Characteristics: age range 25–75; gender: 8 M/2F; ECOG: 0 (1 patient); 1 (9 patients). At dose levels of 24, 48 and 96 mg/m2, no DLTs nor grade 2 or greater drug-related AEs during cycle 1 have been reported. Eight patients received treatment for 2 cycles or more. Preliminary PK profile after the first dose of administration shows a dose dependent increase in AUC and Cmax with an approximate mean half-life of 23 hours (see Table below). At the 96 mg/m2 dose, exposure was in the range of the lower end of the efficacious exposure in certain xenograft models. PD markers including plasma HGF and VEGF and shed/soluble receptors s-Met and s-VEGFR2 have been evaluated. Conclusions: Daily oral administration of MGCD265 was found to be well tolerated at doses of 24, 48, and 96 mg/m2. Further dose escalation is underway. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Low-dose metronomic topotecan and pazopanib in children with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: A C17 Canadian phase I trial (TOPAZ).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10020-10020
Author(s):  
Arif Manji ◽  
Daniel A. Morgenstern ◽  
Yvan Samson ◽  
Rebecca Deyell ◽  
Donna Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Relapsed Disease

10020 Background: Low-dose metronomic topotecan (mTP) represents a novel approach to chemotherapy delivery which, in preclinical models, may work synergistically with pazopanib (PZ) in targeting angiogenesis. This study was designed to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of mTP/PZ in pediatric patients with solid tumors, while describing the safety and toxicity of this regimen. Methods: A phase I dose-escalation, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of mTP/PZ was conducted at ten sites across Canada, enrolling pediatric patients aged 2-21 years with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Patients were treated with oral mTP and PZ suspension daily without interruption in 28-day cycles, with dose escalation in accordance with the rolling-six design. Five dose levels (0.12/125, 0.16/125, 0.22/125, 0.22/160, and 0.3/160 mg/m2/day of mTP/PZ) were evaluated. PK studies were performed on day 1 and at steady state, and PD studies included circulating angiogenic factors VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGF, endoglin and placental growth factor. Results: Thirty patients (pts) were enrolled, of whom 26 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), with median age 12 years (3-20). The most common diagnoses included osteosarcoma (8), neuroblastoma (NB, 7), Ewing sarcoma/PNET (4), and rhabdomyosarcoma (4). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) related to protocol therapy were neutropenia (18%), thrombocytopenia (11%), lymphocytopenia (11%), AST elevation (11%), and lipase elevation (11%). Only 2 cycle-1 DLTs were observed on study, both at the 0.3/160 mg/m2 mTP/PZ dose level (2/5 pts) comprising persistent grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 ALT elevation. No AEs experienced beyond cycle-1 required treatment discontinuation. Best response was stable disease in 10/25 pts (40%) for a median duration of 6.4 months (1.7-45.1). One patient with refractory NB achieved stable disease for 45 months and continued on mTP/PZ via compassionate access after study closure. PK and PD results are pending at this time. Conclusions: The combination of oral mTP and PZ is safe and tolerable in pediatric patients with solid tumors, with a RP2D of mTP 0.22 mg/m2/day and PZ suspension 160 mg/m2/day. Ten patients achieved stable disease for a median of 6 months. The lack of objective responses suggests that this combination is likely of limited benefit for relapsed disease, but may play a role as maintenance therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02303028.

Phase I study of bortezomib and oxaliplatin (BOX) in solid tumors: Improved neurotoxicity (NT) profile with lower bortezomib (B) dose

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12007-12007
Author(s):  
R. A. Kosloff ◽  
J. Wright ◽  
P. Ivy ◽  
J. Escalon ◽  
B. Norwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Major Contributor ◽  
Organ Function ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Platinum Agents

12007 Background: B inhibits proteasome function and may be synergistic in causing apoptotic death with platinum agents. We were interested in combining B with OX but concerned with dose limiting (DL) NT based on our prior B phase I study [Hamilton et al., JCO 2005]: therefore this Phase I dose-escalation study (alternating increases of B and OX) focusing on NT was planned. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic solid tumors, PS 0–2, platinum or taxane naive, no peripheral neuropathy and adequate organ function, received B (D1, 4, 15, 18) and OX (D1, 15) every 28 days in a dose escalation design (see table ). Baseline and monthly assessments were performed by an independent neurologist. Results: 27 (18 gastrointestinal, 3 melanoma, 3 ovarian, 3 others) were accrued; pt characteristics: 14 male/13 female; median age 55 years (range 35–75); 2 median cycles (range 1–10). NT was not DL because it did not occur within the first cycle. Late and limiting NT was observed in levels 2–5 after 2–9 cycles, but serial neurologic evaluations showed reversible NT. With an amended new dose level to lower B to 1.0 mg/m2 (level 6) to avoid late NT, NT was not observed. Of 22 evaluable pts, there were 3 partial responses (ampullary, GE junction, biliary), 6 stable disease, and 13 disease progression by RECIST criteria. Conclusions: biweekly BOX is tolerable at B 1.0 mg/m2 and OX 85 mg/m2 with no DL NT. Additional observations on late NT are ongoing. This suggests B is a major contributor to NT observed in dose levels 2–5 and may potentiate the effects of OX. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

A phase I dose escalation study of sunitinib plus capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3592-3592 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sweeney ◽  
C. Verschraegen ◽  
G. Chiorean ◽  
F. Lee ◽  
S. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

3592 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. This phase I study assesses the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SU in combination with capecitabine (C). Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative therapy, previously treated with =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, and ECOG PS =1 were eligible. Prior antiangiogenic therapy was not permitted. Three SU schedules were evaluated: 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off in 6-wk cycles (4/2 schedule); 2 wks on followed by 1 wk off in 3-wk cycles (2/1 schedule), and continuous dosing (CD schedule). In all cases C was administered orally bid on days 1–14. SU and C doses were alternately escalated in serial pt cohorts to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SU for all schedules using a standard 3 + 3 design. PK and antitumor efficacy were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 pts have been enrolled; 28 pts have been treated on the 4/2 schedule: SU 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2, and SU 37.5 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 were not tolerated. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: grade 3 myalgia (n=1), grade 3 fatigue (n=2), and grade 3 hand- foot syndrome (n=2). The MTD for the 4/2 schedule was SU 37.5 mg/day + C 1,000 mg/m2. No DLTs nor dose reductions were observed among 9 pts treated at the MTD. Preliminary PK data do not indicate drug-drug interactions between SU and C. 3 pts (1 each with breast cancer, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma) achieved confirmed partial responses. On the 2/1 schedule patients are being accrued to SU 37.5 or 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 and doses of SU 37.5 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 or SU 25 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 are being explored on the CD schedule. Conclusions: The combination of SU 37.5 mg/day (4/2 schedule) with C 1,000 mg/m2 in pts with advanced solid tumors appears tolerable. SU may be administered in combination with C with no apparent drug-drug interaction. Subsequent cohorts will define the MTD of SU administered on the 2/1 and CD schedules. Further studies of this combination in breast cancer are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I dose escalation study of the anti-IGF-1R monoclonal antibody CP-751,871 in patients with refractory solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3586-3586 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Haluska ◽  
H. Shaw ◽  
G. N. Batzel ◽  
L. R. Molife ◽  
A. A. Adjei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Receptor Internalization ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Adrenocortical Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Grade 3

3586 Background: The insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-IR), a tyrosine kinase, and its ligands (IGF-I & -2) are upregulated in many human tumors (e.g., breast, prostate, colon and non-small cell lung cancer) and enhance proliferative and prosurvival signaling. Inhibition of IGF-IR activation in tumor models suppresses tumor growth and increases tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy, supporting the development of agents targeting IGF-IR. CP-751,871 is a potent, highly specific, fully humanized, monoclonal antibody that inhibits IGF-IR autophosphorylation and induces receptor internalization. Methods: A Phase I dose escalation study was initiated to define the safety and tolerability, and to characterize the pharmacokinetic properties of CP-751,871 in patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapies. Results: Following informed consent and screening, a total of 24 patients with refractory solid tumors (e.g. colorectal, NSCLC, sarcoma and prostate cancer; 1–6 previous regimens) were enrolled. Patients received 3 to 20 mg/kg of CP-751,871 by IV infusion on Day 1 of 3-week cycles in four dose-escalation cohorts of 3 patients. No dose limiting toxicities were identified and the maximum feasible dose (MFD) cohort of 20 mg/kg was extended with 12 additional patients. No higher than grade 3 CTCAE v3.0 toxicities, attributed to study drug, have been so far reported. Grade 3 toxicities, all reported in patients dosed with 20 mg/kg of CP-751,871, are increased GGT (4%) and fatigue (4%). Grade 2 toxicities include: anorexia (7%), diarrhea (7%), increased GGT (4%), hyperglycemia (4%), fatigue (4%), increased urinary frequency (4%), nausea (4%), increased ALT (4%) and increased AST (4%). Pharmacokinetic analysis is currently ongoing. No objective responses were observed. At the MFD, patients received a median of 4 cycles (1–16). Three patients were stable for > 6 months and one patient, currently at cycle 16, remains on study. An additional cohort of 12 adrenocortical cancer patients is under evaluation. Conclusions: These data indicate that CP-751,871 is safe and well tolerated. Due to its good safety profile, CP-751,871 may constitute a suitable targeted agent to use in combination with approved therapies in multiple tumor types. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of c-Met inhibitor ARQ197 in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2544-2544
Author(s):  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Carla Kurkjian ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

2544 Background: C-Met protein is a receptor tyrosine kinase which is overexpressed or mutated in a variety of tumor types, causing cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Tivantinib is an orally bioavailable small molecule which binds to the c-Met protein. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tivantinib in combination with standard dose FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors for which FOLFOX (5-FU IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; 5-FU CIV 2400 mg/m2 day 1; Leucovorin IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; Oxaliplatin IV 85 mg/m2 day 1) would be appropriate chemotherapy received escalating doses of tivantinib BID (days 1-14) in a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), non-dose-limiting toxicities (NDLTs), safety, and preliminary efficacy were evaluated. Results: Fourteen patients (50% colorectal) were treated across 3 dose levels: 120 mg (n=3); 240 mg (n=5); 360 mg (n=6). No DLTs were observed until the 3rd dose level (treatment delay ≥3 days, secondary to grade 3 neutropenia). Common related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (36%; 0%), neutropenia (0%; 29%), nausea (14%; 14%), vomiting (14%; 14%), dehydration (14%; 7%), and thrombocytopenia (14%; 0%). To date, 7 patients have been evaluated for response including 4 (57%) with stable disease evident at the 8-week evaluation (CRC, 2 patients; unknown primary favoring CRC, 1 patient; esophageal, 1 patient) and 3 (21%) with disease progression. The 4 patients with stable disease are continuing on treatment; three (CRC and unknown primary) had received prior FOLFOX. Conclusions: The addition of tivantinib to standard therapy FOLFOX appears tolerated up to its recommended phase II monotherapy dose of 360 mg. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and a phase II study is proceeding with this regimen for the first line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01611857.

Phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and preliminary efficacy of SC10914 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6047-6047
Author(s):  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jinhai Tang ◽  
Yongmei Yin ◽  
Dingwei Ye ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Adequate Organ Function ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Wbc Count

6047 Background: SC10914 is a highly selective inhibitor of PARP enzymes, including PARP1 and PARP2. SC10914 has a similar structure with olaparib. We conducted a phase I study to assess the safety, tolerability, PK/PD and preliminary efficacy of SC10914 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is a phase I dose-escalation study with 3+3 design, we enrolled patients at 4 sites in China. Eligible patients were diagnosed with advanced solid malignancies who are refractory to standard therapies or for which no standard therapy exists; had measurable disease; had adequate organ function. Patients received SC10914 daily at ten escalating doses from 30 mg QD to 500 mg TID in a 28-day cycle. We obtained blood for PK and CA125 assessments. Toxic effects were assessed by CTCAE 4.03 criteria and tumour responses ascribed by RECIST 1.1 and CA125 was assessed by GCIG criteria. Results: As of January 2020, 52 patients were enrolled, of which 14 were males and 38 were females. Ten doses were escalated to 500mg TID, and no DLT was observed, and MTD was not obtained. The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs and SAEs that were related to SC10914 were 34.6% (18/52) and 13.5% (7/52). Grade 3/4 adverse reaction happened in at least two patients were anaemia/reduced hemoglobin (10/52, 19.2%), decreased WBC count (5/52, 9.6%), neutropenia (3/52, 5.8%), thrombocytopenia (2/52, 3.8%), and decreased lymphocyte count (2/52, 3.8%). A total of 17 gBRCAm evaluable ovarian cancer patients were enrolled, 6 of them had PR, the ORR was 35.3% (6/17). 10 gBRCAm ovarian cancer patients were enrolled in TID groups (including 2 patients who received BID doses at the beginning and changed to 300 mg TID dose after several cycles of treatment), 5 of them had PR, the ORR was 50% (5/10). The ORR of 400 mg TID group was 66.7%(4/6). PK data showed that the exposure of SC10914 was increased with dose increasing at the dose of 30 mg to 250 mg. The half-life of SC10914 was about 2-5 hours. Conclusions: SC10914 was safe in patients with advanced solid tumors. The main toxicity was blood-related adverse reactions. SC10914 was effective in gBRCAm ovarian cancer patients. 400 mg TID might be RP2D. Clinical trial information: NCT02940132.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document