Heterogeneity between core needle biopsy and synchronous axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer patients: Comparison of HER2, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression profiles during primary treatment regime.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12565-e12565
Author(s):  
Laura Weydandt ◽  
Ivonne Nel ◽  
Anne Kreklau ◽  
Lars-Christian Horn ◽  
Bahriye Aktas

e12565 Background: Therapeutic decisions for the primary treatment of breast cancer is commonly based on the expression profiles of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) and the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptors. However, breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease, and receptor changes were manifold reported during progression. Little is known about receptor discordance in the primary setting. Here, we compared receptor expression profiles between core needle biopsy (CNB) of the breast tumor tissue and synchronous axillary lymph node metastases (LNM) not at recurrence, but at the primary treatment. Methods: In a German single center study, we retrospectively analyzed 175 breast cancer patients with axillary synchronous LNM. 69,7% of our patients were without any upfront therapy. Profiles of ER, PR and HER2 were immunohistochemically analyzed using the common cut-off at 10% positive tumor cells vs. the controversially discussed low-positive cut-off at 1%. Receptor status was compared between CNB specimens of the primary tumor tissue and axillary LNM. Further, clinicopathological characteristics were correlated to receptor changes. Results: The discordance rates between CNB and axillary LNM were 12.7% for HER2, 6.9% for ER and 22.6% for PR using the ≥1% cut-off, respective 7.5% for ER and 25.6% for PR when using the ≥10% cut-off-level. The most frequently occurring change was a PR loss. Analysis of clinical parameters revealed a significant association of ER change between CNB and LNM in younger patients (p < 0.01) with increased proliferation marker Ki-67 (p = 0.04). Conclusions: Receptor discordance between CNB and synchronous axillary LNM appears to exist at the primary setting already. Hence, receptor profiles of the tumor tissue and the synchronous axillary LNM should be considered for treatment decision.

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Vilma Madekivi ◽  
Antti Karlsson ◽  
Pia Boström ◽  
Eeva Salminen

Background: Nomograms can help in estimating the nodal status among clinically node-negative patients. Yet their validity in external cohorts over time is unknown. If the nodal stage can be estimated preoperatively, the need for axillary dissection can be decided. Objectives: The aim of this study was to validate three existing nomograms predicting 4 or more axillary lymph node metastases. Method: The risk for ≥4 lymph node metastases was calculated for n = 529 eligible breast cancer patients using the nomograms of Chagpar et al. [Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:670–7], Katz et al. [J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(13):2093–8], and Meretoja et al. [Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138(3):817–27]. Discrimination and calibration were calculated for each nomogram to determine their validity. Results: In this cohort, the AUC values for the Chagpar, Katz, and Meretoja models were 0.79 (95% CI 0.74–0.83), 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.76–0.86), respectively, showing good discrimination between patients with and without high nodal burdens. Conclusion: This study presents support for the use of older breast cancer nomograms and confirms their current validity in an external population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document