The frequency and predictors of end-of-life symptom in patients with advanced cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24061-e24061
Author(s):  
Shuji Hiramoto ◽  
Ayako Kikuchi ◽  
Tomohiko Taniyama ◽  
Hori Tetsuo ◽  
Akira Yoshioka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Pain ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Consciousness Level ◽  
Number Of Patients

e24061 Background: Advanced cancer patients complain of highly distressing symptom at the end-of-life, and important reasons for palliative intervention to relive symptoms. Methods: We analyzed 1282 patients who died of advanced cancer from August 2011 to August 2019 retrospectively. We divided into patients who complain of symptom include fatigue, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, and cancer pain, or didn’t for 3 days prior to death, and analyzed predictors by multiple logistics method. The primary endpoint of this study was to identify frequency and predictors of end-of-life symptoms in advanced cancer patients. Results: As a background, the median age is 73 years old, 690 males, 592 females, 227 gastroesophageal cancers, 250 biliary pancreatic cancers, 54 hepatocellular carcinomas, 189 colorectal cancer, 251 lung cancers, 71 breast cancers, 58 urological malignancies, 60 gynecological malignancies, 47 head and neck cancer, 31 hematological malignancies, and 22 sarcomas. Number of patients who complained of dyspnea, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and cancer pain were 235 (18.3%), 318 (24.8%), 81 (6.3%), and 322 (25.1%) at the end-of-life. In a multivariate analysis, peritoneal metastasis (ORs 1.812), with mental (ORs 0.549), palliative referral (ORs 0.680), Eastern Cancer Organization Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) (OR0.679) and consciousness level (ORs 0.610) was independent predictors in patients with fatigue at the end-of-life. Chest cancer (Odds Ratio 2.635), lung (ORs 2.159), brain (ORs 0.431) and peritoneal metastasis (ORs 0.602), with mental (ORs 0.429), respiratory (ORs 1.960) and metabolic disorder (ORs 0.520), palliative referral (ORs 0.645) and consciousness level (ORs 0.468) was independent predictors in patients with dyspnea. Lung metastasis (ORs 0.480, peritoneal metastasis (ORs 1.812), with anti-cancer therapy (OR 2.244) and consciousness level (ORs 0.610) was independent predictors in patients with nausea and vomiting. Brain metastasis (ORs 0.435, liver metastasis (ORs 1.374), and consciousness level (ORs 0.599) was independent predictors in patients with cancer pain. Conclusions: We reported frequency and independent predictors of end-of-life symptoms in advanced cancer patients. Information on these predictors be useful to explaining about their end-of-life in advance.

A picture of early death after admission in patients with advanced cancer at the end-of-life.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Shuji Hiramoto ◽  
Ayako Kikuchi ◽  
Hori Tetsuo ◽  
Akira Yoshioka ◽  
Tomoko Tamaki
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Site ◽  
Consciousness Level ◽  
Continuous Sedation ◽  
And Performance

80 Background: Little is unknown about a picture of early death after admission in terminal phase of advanced cancer patients. Previous studies have reported that approximately 14.3% of patients with cancer enroll in hospice in the last 3days of life. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data for 510 advanced cancer patients at the end of life between August 2011 and August 2016, and contained deceased 83 (16.3%) patients within 3days after admission in our institute. We divided into deceased patients within 3days and more than 4days after admission. Primary endpoints are to compare each symptom (delirium, cancer pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue) and intervention (hydration, continuous sedation, opioid) at the end of life. Secondary endpoints are association between prognostic factor and early death (within 3days) after admission. Results: Symptoms about delirium, cancer pain, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting were no significant difference between deceased patients within 3days and more than 4days after admission. Mean hydration at the end of life was more significantly volume of infusion for patients in within 3days (0.34 Litters/day) than in over 4 days (0.20 Litters/day). Continuous sedation was significantly less for patients within 3days (4.82%) than in over 4 days (28.64%). Mean of opioid use was significantly less for patients within 3days (Oral morphine dose 23.54mg/day) than in over 4 days (41.11mg/day). In univariate analysis primary site of cancer was tend to (p = 0.086), and number of metastatic site (p = 0.018) and consciousness level ( < 0.0001) and performance status ( < 0.0001) were significantly associated with early death. In multivariate analysis number of metastatic site (p = 0.057) and consciousness level ( < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.0004) were significantly associated with early death. Conclusions: We reports a picture of early death after admission in advanced cancer patients at the end-of-life, and number of metastatic site and consciousness level and performance status might be predictors for short-term prediction model.

Time Perception of Cancer Patients Without Evidence of Disease and Advanced Cancer Patients in a Palliative, End-of-Life-Care Setting

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 453-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
Johannes Schilderman ◽  
Constans A. H. H. V. M. Verhagen ◽  
Judith B. Prins
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Time Perception ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

scholarly journals Shifting Palliative Care Paradigm in Primary Care From Better Death to Better End-of-Life : A Swiss Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna Sommer ◽  
Christopher Chung ◽  
Dagmar M. Haller ◽  
Sophie Pautex
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Communication Skills ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Abstract Background: Patients suffering from advanced cancer often loose contact with their primary care physician (PCP) during oncologic treatment and palliative care is introduced very late.The aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and procedures for a randomized trial of an intervention to teach PCPs a palliative care approach and communication skills to improve advanced cancer patients’ quality of life. Methods: Observational pilot study in 5 steps. 1) Recruitment of PCPs. 2) Intervention: training on palliative care competencies and communication skills addressing end-of-life issues.3) Recruitment of advanced cancer patients by PCPs. 4) Patients follow-up by PCPs, and assessment of their quality of life by a research assistant 5) Feedback from PCPs using a semi-structured focus group and three individual interviews with qualitative deductive theme analysis.Results: 8 PCPs were trained. PCPs failed to recruit patients for fear of imposing additional loads on their patients. PCPs changed their approach of advanced cancer patients. They became more conscious of their role and responsibility during oncologic treatments and felt empowered to take a more active role picking up patient’s cues and addressing advance directives. They developed interprofessional collaborations for advance care planning. Overall, they discovered the role to help patients to make decisions for a better end-of-life.Conclusions: PCPs failed to recruit advanced cancer patients, but reported a change in paradigm about palliative care. They moved from a focus on helping patients to die better, to a new role helping patients to define the conditions for a better end-of-life.Trial registration : The ethics committee of the canton of Geneva approved the study (2018-00077 Pilot Study) in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki

An early palliative care intervention can be confronting but reassuring: A qualitative study on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 783-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Fliedner ◽  
Sofia Zambrano ◽  
Jos MGA Schols ◽  
Marie Bakitas ◽  
Christa Lohrmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Decisions ◽  
Early Palliative Care ◽  
Network Support ◽  
Care Intervention ◽  
Life Decisions

Background: Intervention trials confirm that patients with advanced cancer receiving early palliative care experience a better quality of life and show improved knowledge about and use of palliative care services. To involve patients in future health-care decisions, health professionals should understand patients’ perspectives. However, little is known about how patients’ experience such interventions. Aim: To explore advanced cancer patients’ experiences with a structured early palliative care intervention, its acceptability and impact on the patients’ life including influencing factors. Design: Qualitative content analysis of in-depth, semi-structured interviews. Setting/participants: Patients with various advanced cancer diagnoses were enrolled in a multicenter randomized controlled trial (NCT01983956), which investigated the impact of “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support,” a structured early palliative care intervention, on distress. Of these, 20 patients who underwent the intervention participated in this study. Results: Participants received the intervention well and gained a better understanding of their personal situation. Patients reported that the intervention can feel “confronting” but with the right timing it can be confirming and facilitate family conversations. Patients’ personal background and the intervention timing within their personal disease trajectory influenced their emotional and cognitive experiences; it also impacted their understanding of palliative care and triggered actions toward future care planning. Conclusion: Early palliative care interventions like “Symptoms, End-of-life decisions, Network, Support” may provoke emotions and feel “confrontational” often because this is the first time when issues about one’s end of life are openly discussed; yet, advanced cancer patients found it beneficial and felt it should be incorporated into routine care.

Individual Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy for Advanced Cancer Patients

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Breitbart ◽  
Wendy G. Lichtenthal ◽  
Allison J. Applebaum ◽  
Melissa Masterson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Intervention ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Existential Psychology ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Spiritual Well Being ◽  
Existential Concerns

Among the advanced cancer population, existential concerns are major issues that promote significant distress. For patients who are facing death, meaning and the preservation of meaning are not only clinically and existentially important but also central concepts to a therapeutic intervention. Based on Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy and the principles of existential psychology and philosophy, “meaning-centered psychotherapy” was developed to help patients with advanced cancer sustain or enhance a sense of meaning, peace, and purpose in their lives. This chapter provides an overview of work developing and testing individual meaning-centered psychotherapy (IMCP). It provides an overview of the session content in the IMCP intervention. It also presents findings from clinical trials, which support the efficacy of IMCP as an intervention to increase a sense of meaning, spiritual well-being, and hope while decreasing end-of-life despair. Furthermore, it presents difficult scenarios that may arise when delivering IMCP for clinicians interested in this work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document