A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of ruxolitinib plus parsaclisib in patients with JAK- and PI3K-inhibitor treatment-naïve myelofibrosis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7058-TPS7058
Author(s):  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Susan Erickson-Viitanen ◽  
Feng Zhou ◽  
Albert Assad
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
The United States ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Pi3k Inhibitor ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Reported

TPS7058 Background: Ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) significantly improves outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (MF); however, a subset of patients may experience a suboptimal response. Recent phase 2 data showed that addition of PI3Kδ inhibitor parsaclisib to ruxolitinib monotherapy resulted in additional alleviation of MF symptoms and splenomegaly in patients with MF (Yacoub. EHA2020. S216). This phase 3, randomized, double-blind study (INCB 50465-313; NCT04551066), evaluates the combination of ruxolitinib and parsaclisib in patients with MF who are naïve to Janus kinase (JAK) and PI3K inhibitor therapies. Methods: Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of primary MF, post-polycythemia vera MF, or post-essential thrombocythemia MF, have a Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS; Passamonti. Blood. 2010;115:1703-1708) risk category of at least Intermediate (INT)-1, palpable spleen ≥5 cm below left subcostal margin; total symptom score ≥10 at screening, ECOG PS 0–2, and life expectancy ≥24 weeks. Patients will be excluded if they previously received therapy with any JAK inhibitor, any PI3K inhibitor, any experimental or standard drug therapy for MF ≤3 months of first study dose and/or lack of recovery from all toxicities related to previous therapies to grade ≤1, have recent history of inadequate bone marrow reserve (eg, platelet count = 50×109/L) or have inadequate liver or renal function at screening. Approximately 440 patients will be randomized (1:1) to ruxolitinib plus parsaclisib 5 mg QD or ruxolitinib plus matching placebo, with stratification at randomization by DIPSS risk category (high vs INT-2 vs INT-1) and platelet count (≥100×109/L vs 50 to = 100×109/L inclusive). Treatment will begin on Day 1, with starting ruxolitinib dose level determined by baseline platelet count, and will continue as long as treatment is tolerated and discontinuation criteria are not met. When the last enrolled patient has completed 24 weeks of treatment, the study will be unblinded and patients randomized to ruxolitinib plus placebo who have adequate hematology parameters will be able to crossover to receive parsaclisib together with continued ruxolitinib. The primary objective is the evaluation and comparison of spleen volume at Week 24 for patients who received ruxolitinib plus parsaclisib versus ruxolitinib plus placebo. Secondary objectives include evaluation and comparison of patient-reported MF symptoms, overall survival, time to onset and duration of response in spleen volume, and safety and tolerability for ruxolitinib plus parsaclisib versus ruxolitinib plus placebo. Sites are opening across the United States, Europe, Asia, and New Zealand. Clinical trial information: NCT04551066.

scholarly journals P210 Efficacy and safety of filgotinib for patients with RA with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH1 primary outcome results

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Bernard G Combe ◽  
Alan J Kivitiz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, potent, selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown good efficacy and was well tolerated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL treatment in patients with RA who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, active- and placebo (PBO)-controlled study randomised patients with active RA (3:3:2:3) to FIL 200mg, FIL 100mg, adalimumab [ADA] 40mg every 2 weeks, or PBO daily for up to 52 weeks; results through week 24 are presented. Patients also received background MTX. Primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at week 12; additional clinical assessments included ACR50 and ACR70 and DAS28-CRP score ≤3.2 and <2.6, and patient-reported outcomes including HAQ-DI. Safety endpoints included adverse event types and rates. Logistic regression was used for superiority test of FIL vs PBO for ACR response and other binary endpoints, while mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) were used for continuous endpoints. Non-inferiority test of FIL to ADA (preserving >50% of ADA response) was performed for DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 and <2.6. Results Of 1,759 patients randomised, 1,755 received study drug: 475 FIL 200mg; 480 FIL 100mg; 325 ADA; and 475 PBO, of which 89.5%, 90.4%, 88.9%, and 81.3%, respectively, completed 24 weeks of study drug. 81.8% were female, mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of RA was 7.8 (7.6) years, and mean (SD) DAS28-CRP was 5.7 (0.9). At week 12, significantly more patients in the FIL 200mg and 100mg arms achieved an ACR20 improvement vs PBO (Table 1). More patients receiving FIL achieved ACR50 and ACR70 improvements, DAS28-CRP scores ≤3.2 and <2.6 and reported improvements in HAQ-DI scores versus PBO (Table 1). Non-inferiority of FIL 200mg to ADA was met based on DAS28-CRP ≤3.2. The FIL safety profile was consistent with prior studies through Week 24. Conclusion FIL 200mg and 100mg led to significant improvement in signs and symptoms of RA, prevented radiographic progression, improved physical function compared to PBO, and was well-tolerated. Efficacy of FIL 200mg was non-inferior to ADA based on DAS28-CRP ≤3.2. Disclosures D. Walker: Other; Received support from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. B.G. Combe: Honoraria; Received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB. A.J. Kivitiz: Consultancies; Consultant to AbbVie, Celgene, Horizon, Jansses, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Genzyme, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion and Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Novartis. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; Honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly ans Co., Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, BMS, Takeda, Misubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin. Grants/research support; Grant support from Asahi-Kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, BMS, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Ono, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvi and YL. D. van der Heijde: Corporate appointments; Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Consultancies; Consultant for consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB. F. Matzkies: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. C. Tasset: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. J.S. Sundy: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. N. Mozaffarian: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB.. S. Bae: None. E.C. Keystone: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, BMS Canada, Celltrion, Crescendo, Bioscience, F.Hoffman-La Roche Inc., Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., Merck, Pfizer,, PuraPharm, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Samsumg Bioepsis, and UCB. P. Nash: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, BMS, Jansses, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Celgene and Gilead.

scholarly journals Eptinezumab for the prevention of chronic migraine: efficacy and safety through 24 weeks of treatment in the phase 3 PROMISE-2 (Prevention of migraine via intravenous ALD403 safety and efficacy–2) study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Silberstein ◽  
Merle Diamond ◽  
Nada A. Hindiyeh ◽  
David M. Biondi ◽  
Roger Cady ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Migraine ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patient Global Impression ◽  
Calcitonin Gene ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Global Impression Of Change

Abstract Background PROMISE-2 was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of repeat intravenous (IV) doses of the calcitonin gene-related peptide–targeted monoclonal antibody eptinezumab (ALD403) for migraine prevention in adults with chronic migraine. This report describes the results of PROMISE-2 through 24 weeks of treatment. Methods Patients received up to two 30-min IV administrations of eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo separated by 12 weeks. Patients recorded migraine and headache endpoints in a daily eDiary. Additional assessments, including patient-reported outcomes, were performed at regularly scheduled clinic visits throughout the 32-week study period (screening, day 0, and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 32). Results A total of 1072 adults received treatment: eptinezumab 100 mg, n = 356; eptinezumab 300 mg, n = 350; placebo, n = 366. The reduction in mean monthly migraine days observed during the first dosing interval (100 mg, − 7.7 days; 300 mg, − 8.2 days; placebo, − 5.6 days) was further decreased after an additional dose (100 mg, − 8.2 days; 300 mg, − 8.8 days; placebo, − 6.2 days), with both doses of eptinezumab demonstrating consistently greater reductions from baseline compared to placebo. The ≥50% and ≥ 75% migraine responder rates (MRRs) increased after a second dose, with more eptinezumab-treated patients experiencing migraine response than placebo patients (≥50% MRRs weeks 13–24: 100 mg, 61.0%; 300 mg, 64.0%; placebo, 44.0%; and ≥ 75% MRRs weeks 13–24: 100 mg, 39.3%; 300 mg, 43.1%; placebo, 23.8%). The percentages of patients who improved on patient-reported outcomes, including the Headache Impact Test and Patient Global Impression of Change, increased following the second dose administration at week 12, and were greater with eptinezumab than with placebo at all time points. No new safety concerns were identified with the second dose regarding the incidence, nature, and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusion Eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg administered IV at day 0 and repeated at week 12 provided sustained migraine preventive benefit over a full 24 weeks and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in patients with chronic migraine. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT02974153). Registered November 23, 2016.

scholarly journals P217 Efficacy and safety of filgotinib for patients with RA naïve to MTX therapy: FINCH3 primary outcome results

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil McKay ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Rene Westhovens ◽  
William F. C Rigby ◽  
Daniel W. T Ching ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Study Drug ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oral Steroids

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL), an orally administered, potent, selective inhibitor of janus kinase 1 (JAK1), has shown good efficacy and was well tolerated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objectives of this study were to compare efficacy and safety of FIL with and without methotrexate (MTX) in patients with RA who were naïve to MTX therapy. Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled study randomised patients with moderately to severely active RA (2:1:1:2) to FIL 200mg daily+MTX, FIL 100mg+MTX, FIL 200mg (+placebo [PBO]), or MTX (+PBO) up to 52 weeks; results are through week 24. Primary endpoint was proportion achieving ACR20 response at week 24. Safety endpoints included adverse events types and rates. Results Of 1,252 randomised patients, 1,249 received study drug (416 FIL 200mg+MTX; 207 FIL 100mg+MTX; 210 FIL 200mg monotherapy; 416 MTX monotherapy) and were analysed; 1,130 completed week 24. Most (76.9%) were female; mean time since RA diagnosis was 2.2 years (median 0.4 years); mean (standard deviation [SD]) DAS28-CRP was 5.7 (1.0); and 35.9% were using oral steroids at baseline. At week 24, significantly more patients in the FIL 200mg+MTX (81.0%; P<0.001) and FIL 100mg+MTX (80.2%; P<0.05) arms achieved an ACR20 response compared to MTX monotherapy (71.4%)(Table 1). Compared to MTX monotherapy, more patients receiving FIL with or without MTX achieved ACR50 and ACR70 responses, DAS28-CRP <2.6 and ≤3.2, and reported improvements in SF-36 PCS (Table 1). The onset of activity was rapid, with significantly more patients achieving ACR50 and DAS28-CRP <2.6 with FIL than MTX at week 2. The FIL safety profile was consistent with prior studies through week 24. Serious AEs were observed in 4.1%, 2.4%, 4.8%, and 2.9% of patients in the FIL 200mg+MTX, FIL 100mg+MTX, FIL 200mg monotherapy, and MTX monotherapy groups, respectively. There was 1 death from lupus cardiomyopathy. Conclusion The JAK1 inhibitor FIL in combination with MTX led to significant improvements in RA signs and symptoms, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes compared to MTX alone and was well tolerated in patients with early active RA naïve to MTX. Clinically meaningful response to FIL occurred as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. Disclosures N. McKay: None. D. van der Heijde: Corporate appointments; Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., UCB. R. Westhovens: Corporate appointments; Advisor for Celltrion and Galapagos/Gilead. Other; Advisor for Celltrion and Galapagos/Gilead. W.F.C. Rigby: Consultancies; Consultant for Gilead. D.W.T. Ching: Corporate appointments; Speaker for AbbVie. Member of speakers’ bureau; Speaker for AbbVie. B. Bartok: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. F. Matzkies: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Z. Yin: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. C. Tasset: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. J.S. Sundy: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. N. Mozaffarian: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. O.D. Messina: Honoraria; Received Honoraria from Pfizer, Amgen, and Americas Health Foundation (AHF). R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB. T. Atsumi: None. G.R. Burmester: Honoraria; Received Honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer.

scholarly journals P133 Filgotinib in patients with RA with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH 1 52-week efficacy and patient reported outcomes data

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Susan Lee ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background/Aims  Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, potent, selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor. FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) assessed FIL efficacy, safety and patient reported outcome (PRO) data in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR). We report data through week 52 (W52) of the FINCH 1 study. Primary outcome results at week (W)12 and W24 were previously reported. Methods  This global, phase 3, double-blind, active- and placebo (PBO)-controlled study randomised MTX-IR pts with active RA on a background of stable MTX 3:3:2:3 to oral FIL 200 mg or FIL 100 mg once daily, subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every 2W, or PBO up to W52; pts receiving PBO at W24 were re-randomised to FIL 100 or 200 mg. Efficacy was assessed using clinical, radiographic, and pt-reported outcomes; W52 comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity, and nominal p-values are reported. Safety endpoints included types and rates of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. PRO assessment included the HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale, SF-36, and FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire. Change from baseline (CFB) at various time points was assessed up to W52 for each treatment group. Results  Of 1,755 treated pts, 1,417 received study drug through W52. FIL efficacy was sustained through W52 with DAS28(CRP) <2.6 remission rates of 54%, 43%, and 46% of pts receiving FIL 200 and 100 mg and ADA, respectively, (nominal p for FIL 200 vs ADA = 0.024) (Table 1). FIL safety profile through W52 was consistent with W24 data. AEs of interest were infrequent and balanced among treatments. As early as W2, through W24, pts receiving either dose of FIL experienced nominally significantly greater (p < 0.001) CFB in HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale than those receiving PBO. These improvements were sustained up to W52. In general, CFB for HAQ-DI, VAS pain scale, and FACIT-Fatigue observed for the FIL groups was higher or comparable to ADA through W52 (Table 1). P133 Table 1:Efficacy and PRO outcomes at Week 52Efficacy OutcomeFIL 200 mg (n = 475)FIL 100 mg (n = 480)ADA (n = 325)ACR20/50/70, %a78/62/4476/59/3874/59/39DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, %a66+5959mTSSb,c0.18+++0.450.61HAQ-DIc,d−0.93+−0.85−0.85VAS pain scalec,d−42−40−40SF-36 PCSc,d12.011.512.4FACIT-Fc,d11.912.211.7aNon-responder imputation,bLeast squares mean change from baseline,cObserved case,dMean change from baseline.+nominal p < 0.05, +++nominal p < 0.001 vs ADA ADA, adalimumab; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue; FIL, filgotinib; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; mTSS, modified van der Heijde TSS; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Survey. Conclusion  Through W52, both FIL 200 and 100 mg showed sustained efficacy, rapid and sustained improvement in patient QoL based on clinical and pt-reported outcomes and were well tolerated in MTX-IR pts with RA. Disclosure  D. Walker: Consultancies; Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche. A. Kivitz: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; Celgene, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Genzyme, Flexion, AbbVie. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Y. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda and UCB. S. Lee: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. H. Hu: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. F. Matzkies: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. J.S. Sundy: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. A. Jahreis: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. Besuyen: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos BV. Other; Employee of Galapagos BV. B. Combe: Other; Reports research support, honoraria, consulting and speaker fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi; and UCB. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie; Amgen; Astellas; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene; Cyxone; Daiichi-Sankyo; Eisai; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Glaxo-Smith-Kline; Janssen;, Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Regeneron; Roche; Sanofi; Takeda; and UCB. J. Simon-Campos: None. H.S.B. Baraf: Grants/research support; AbbVie; Horizon; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer; Janssen; and Merck. U. Kumar: None. C. Tasset: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos NV. Other; Employee of Galapagos NV. N. Mozaffarian: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; and UCB. S. Bae: None. E. Keystone: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker fees from AbbVie; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celltrion; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.; Genentech, Inc; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Lilly, ; Merck; Myriad Autoimmune; Pfizer; PuraPharm; Sandoz; Sanofi-Genzyme; Samsung Bioepsis; and UCB. P. Nash: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker and personal fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc; Janssen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Pfizer;, Roche; Sanofi; and UCB.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document