scholarly journals Challenges in the Delivery of Quality Breast Cancer Care: Initiation of Adjuvant Hormone Therapy at an Urban Safety Net Hospital

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e107-e112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meaghan M. Crowley ◽  
Molly E. McCoy ◽  
Sharon M. Bak ◽  
Sarah E. Caron ◽  
Naomi Y. Ko ◽  
...  

Urgently needed interventions to reduce disparities in breast cancer treatment should take into account obstacles inherent among immigrant and indigent populations and complexities of multidisciplinary cancer care.

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 452-457
Author(s):  
Kate Festa ◽  
Ariel E. Hirsch ◽  
Michael R. Cassidy ◽  
Lauren Oshry ◽  
Kathryn Quinn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate Festa ◽  
Ariel E Hirsch ◽  
Michael R Cassidy ◽  
Lauren Oshry ◽  
Kathryn Quinn ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482096628
Author(s):  
Erica Choe ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Ma’at Hembrick ◽  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Junko Ozao-Choy

Background While prior studies have shown the apparent health disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, there is a gap in knowledge with respect to access to breast cancer care among minority women. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate how patients presented and accessed cancer care services in our urban safety net hospital. Patient demographics, cancer stage, history of breast cancer screening, and process of referral to cancer care were collected and analyzed. Results Of the 202 patients identified, 61 (30%) patients were younger than the age of 50 and 75 (63%) were of racial minority background. Only 39% of patients with a new breast cancer were diagnosed on screening mammogram. Women younger than the age of 50 ( P < .001) and minority women ( P < .001) were significantly less likely to have had any prior screening mammograms. Furthermore, in patients who met the screening guideline age, more than half did not have prior screening mammograms. Discussion Future research should explore how to improve breast cancer screening rates within our county patient population and the potential need for revision of screening guidelines for minority patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 229 (4) ◽  
pp. S159
Author(s):  
Kristin N. Kelly ◽  
Emily Ryon ◽  
Ahkeel Allen ◽  
Dido Franceschi ◽  
Mecker Moller ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kristin N. Kelly ◽  
Alexandra Hernandez ◽  
Sina Yadegarynia ◽  
Emily Ryon ◽  
Dido Franceschi ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidemarie Haller ◽  
Petra Voiß ◽  
Holger Cramer ◽  
Anna Paul ◽  
Mattea Reinisch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Cancer registries usually assess data of conventional treatments and/or patient survival. Beyond that, little is known about the influence of other predictors of treatment response related to the use of complementary therapies (CM) and lifestyle factors affecting patients’ quality and quantity of life. Methods INTREST is a prospective cohort study collecting register data at multiple German certified cancer centers, which provide individualized, integrative, in- and outpatient breast cancer care. Patient-reported outcomes and clinical cancer data of anticipated N = 715 women with pTNM stage I-III breast cancer are collected using standardized case report forms at the time of diagnosis, after completing neo−/adjuvant chemotherapy, after completing adjuvant therapy (with the exception of endocrine therapy) as well as 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after baseline. Endpoints for multivariable prediction models are quality of life, fatigue, treatment adherence, and progression-based outcomes/survival. Predictors include the study center, sociodemographic characteristics, histologic cancer and comorbidity data, performance status, stress perception, depression, anxiety, sleep quality, spirituality, social support, physical activity, diet behavior, type of conventional treatments, use of and belief in CM treatments, and participation in a clinical trial. Safety is recorded following the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Discussion This trial is currently recruiting participants. Future analyses will allow to identify predictors of short- and long-term response to integrative breast cancer treatment in women, which, in turn, may improve cancer care as well as quality and quantity of life with cancer. Trial registration German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00014852. Retrospectively registered at July 4th, 2018.


Author(s):  
Tatiana de Bem Fretta ◽  
Leonessa Boing ◽  
Augusto do Prado Baffa ◽  
Adriano Ferreti Borgatto ◽  
Adriana Coutinho de Azevedo Guimarães

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 207-207
Author(s):  
Katherine Y. Tossas-Milligan ◽  
Anne Marie Murphy ◽  
Christine B. Weldon ◽  
Julia Rachel Trosman ◽  
Melissa A. Simon ◽  
...  

207 Background: Women with personal or family history suggestive of susceptibility to hereditary breast or ovarian cancer (HBOC) should be referred to genetic assessment (USPSTF, Ann Intern Med. 2005). Women with HBOC have a 50-85% lifetime risk of breast cancer, 30-50% of breast cancer before 50 years old,15-50% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer, and 40-60% chance of developing a second breast cancer (ASCO Cancer.net HBOC 8/2013). Our goal is to examine if this almost decade old guideline is followed in breast cancer treatment and breast cancer imaging centers in a large metropolitan area. Methods: We conducted an IRB approved web survey of all 35 breast cancer treatment sites (5 academic, 21 community, 9 public or safety net) and 58 breast imaging sites (5 academic, 27 community, 26 public or safety net) in Chicago. Results were analyzed using simple frequencies and Fisher's exact test. Results: We achieved a response rate of 91% (32/35 treatment sites, 53/58 imaging sites). We found that 56% (18/32) of treatment sites have a hereditary cancer syndrome (HBOC) screening process for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Most of these sites, 83% (15/18), always use genetic test results in surgical decisions, as compared to 21% (3/14) of sites that do not have an HBOC screening process, p=0.0009. Only 8% (4/53) of breast imaging sites have an HBOC screening process and provide indicated patients genetic assessment information and/or referrals. While 38% (20/53) of imaging sites conduct daily internal staff discussions of hereditary risk, only 15% of them (3/20) provide genetic assessment information to indicated patients. We found no statistically significant difference between practices of academic, community, public and safety net sites. Conclusions: Breast cancer treatment sites have partial adherence to HBOC risk screening guidelines; while breast imaging sites rarely adhere to HBOC risk assessment guidelines. Consistent HBOC risk screening protocols are needed in breast cancer treatment and breast cancer imaging sites that include providing indicated patients information about, and access to, genetic assessment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 2137-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina A. Bickell ◽  
Alexandra DeNardis Moss ◽  
Maria Castaldi ◽  
Ajay Shah ◽  
Alan Sickles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document