Pilot Study of Patients’ Preferences for Immediate Resection Versus a Watch and Wait Approach After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00158
Author(s):  
Ashray Gunjur ◽  
Grace Chazan ◽  
Genni Newnham ◽  
Sue-Anne McLachlan
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Watch And Wait ◽  
Time Tradeoff

PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients’ tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients.

Totally neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with mFOLFOX6 in locally advanced rectal cancer: A single arm phase II study (FOTAC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS816-TPS816
Author(s):  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Yue Cai ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Jian Xiao ◽  
Dianke Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
Chemoradiation Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Therapy

TPS816 Background: Preoperative 5-Fluorouracil based chemoradiotherapy is the standard of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. About 15% to 18% of patients would achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) after 5-Fluorouracil based chemoradiation. And the survival outcome of patients with pCR was much better than that of non-pCR. In our previous FOWARC study, in the group of preoperative systemic chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 combined with radiation, the pCR rate was up to 27.5%. In another study, adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemo radiation in locally advanced rectal cancer improve the pCR rate to 38%. This phase II study aimed to explore whether totally neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with mFOLFOX6 could further improve the pCR rate in locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: The primary endpoint is the pathologic complete response rate (pCR).The secondary endpoint included 3-year disease free survival rate, 3-year local recurrence rate, and safety. We hypothesized that totally neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with mFOLFOX6 could improve the pCR rate from 18% to 45% with 5% type I error and 80% power. Fifty patients met inclusion criteria will be enrolled in the trial. All patients will receive long term radiation for 25 times and 50Gy before surgery. Four cycles of mFOLFOX6 would be performed every 2 weeks during radiotherapy, and another 4-6 cycles would be added after radiotherapy and before operation. Totally, the patients will receive 8-10 cycles of chemotherapy before surgery. MRI of the pelvic will be performed every 4 cycles of the therapy to assess clinical response. Then the patient will receive total mesorectal excision at least 8 weeks after radiotherapy. The post-operative chemotherapy will be omitted and all the patients go to surveillance. Clinical trial information: NCT02887313.

scholarly journals Avoiding Unnecessary Major Rectal Cancer Surgery by Implementing Structural Restaging and a Watch-and-Wait Strategy After Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. F. Huisman ◽  
I. J. H. Schoenaker ◽  
R. M. Brohet ◽  
O. Reerink ◽  
H. van der Sluis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Response Evaluation ◽  
Watch And Wait ◽  
Time To Event

Abstract Background Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is found in 15–20% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has been introduced as an alternative strategy to avoid surgery for selected patients with a clinical complete response at multidisciplinary response evaluation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multidisciplinary response evaluation by comparing the proportion of patients with pCR since the introduction of the structural response evaluation with the period before response evaluation. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT between January 2009 and May 2018, categorizing them into cohort A (period 2009–2015) and cohort B (period 2015–2018). The patients in cohort B underwent structural multidisciplinary response evaluation with the option of the W&W strategy. Proportion of pCR (ypT0N0), time-to-event (pCR) analysis, and stoma-free survival were evaluated in both cohorts. Results Of the 259 patients in the study, 21 (18.4%) in cohort A and in 8 (8.7%) in cohort B had pCR (p = 0.043). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a significant pCR decline in cohort B (p < 0.001). The stoma-free patient rate was 24% higher in cohort B (p < 0.001). Conclusion Multidisciplinary clinical response evaluation after nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer led to a significant decrease in unnecessary surgery for the patients with a complete response.

scholarly journals Best MRI predictors of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (1060) ◽  
pp. 20150328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirthi Sathyakumar ◽  
Anuradha Chandramohan ◽  
Dipti Masih ◽  
Mark Ranjan Jesudasan ◽  
Anna Pulimood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Microsatellite instability (MSI) as an independent predictor of pathologic complete response (PCR) in locally advanced rectal cancer: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 616-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaakir Hasan ◽  
Paul Renz ◽  
Rodney E Wegner ◽  
Gene Grant Finley ◽  
Moses S. Raj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
National Cancer Database

616 Background: The relationship between microsatellite instability (MSI) and response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in rectal cancer is not well understood. We therefore utilized the national cancer database (NCDB) to investigate the association between MSI and pathologic complete response (pCR) in this patient population. Methods: We analyzed 5,086 patients between 2010-2015 with locally advanced rectal cancer who were tested for MSI and treated definitively with chemoradiation followed by surgery. Primary comparison groups were between 4,450 MSI-negative(-) and 636 MSI-positive(+) patients. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to identify demographic, therapeutic, and clinical characteristics predictive of pCR. Cox proportional hazard ratios were used for survival. Results: All patients were treated with definitive chemoradiation (median dose 50.4 Gy) followed by resection within 4 months. MSI(+) patients were associated with earlier year of diagnosis and higher grade tumors (P < 0.05). The overall pCR rate was 8.6%, including 8.9% for MSI(-) and 5.9% for MSI(+) tumors (P = 0.01). Along with lower T stage, MSI(+) cases were significantly associated with a reduced pCR rate (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 – 0.96) with multivariable analysis. The 5-year survival for patients with pCR was 93% compared to 73% without it (< 0.001). Conclusions: Microsatellite instability was independently associated with a reduction in pathologic complete response for locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation in this NCDB-based analysis.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document