Risk Assessment of New Drugs, Pharmacoepidemiology, and Regulatory Decisionmaking

2018 ◽  
pp. 23-41
Author(s):  
Robert C. Nelson
Keyword(s):  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (20) ◽  
pp. 1974-1988
Author(s):  
Sanjay Kaul ◽  
Norman Stockbridge ◽  
Javed Butler

Balancing benefits and risks is a complex task that poses a major challenge, both to the approval of new medicines and devices by regulatory authorities and in therapeutic decision-making in practice. Several analysis methods and visualization tools have been developed to help evaluate and communicate whether the benefit–risk profile is favorable or unfavorable. In this White Paper, we describe approaches to benefit–risk assessment using qualitative approaches such as the Benefit Risk Action Team framework developed by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, and the Benefit–Risk Framework developed by the United States Food and Drug Administration; and quantitative approaches such as the numbers needed to treat for benefit and harm, the benefit–risk ratio, and Incremental Net Benefit. We give illustrative examples of benefit–risk evaluations using 4 treatment interventions including sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes; a direct antithrombin agent, dabigatran, for reducing stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis; and antiplatelet agents vorapaxar and prasugrel for reducing cardiovascular events in patients at high cardiovascular risk. Regular applications of structured benefit–risk assessment, whether qualitative, quantitative, or both, enabled by easy-to-understand graphical presentations that capture uncertainties around the benefit–risk metric, may aid shared decision-making and enhance transparency of those decisions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. José Gómez-Lechón ◽  
Laia Tolosa ◽  
M. Teresa Donato

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiez Zannad ◽  
Wendy Gattis Stough ◽  
Raymond J. Lipicky ◽  
Juan Tamargo ◽  
George L. Bakris ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Sahli Costabal ◽  
Kinya Seo ◽  
Euan Ashley ◽  
Ellen Kuhl

Abstract.An undesirable side effect of drugs are cardiac arrhythmias, in particular a condition called torsades de pointes. Current paradigms for drug safety evaluation are costly, lengthy, and conservative, and impede efficient drug development. Here we combine multiscale experiment and simulation, high-performance computing, and machine learning to create an easy-to-use risk assessment diagram to quickly and reliable stratify the pro-arrhythmic potential of new and existing drugs. We capitalize on recent developments in machine learning and integrate information across ten orders of magnitude in space and time to provide a holistic picture of the effects of drugs, either individually or in combination with other drugs. We show, both experimentally and computationally, that drug-induced arrhythmias are dominated by the interplay of two currents with opposing effects: the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current and the L-type calcium current. Using Gaussian process classification, we create a classifier that stratifies safe and arrhythmic domains for any combinations of these two currents. We demonstrate that our classifier correctly identifies the risk categories of 23 common drugs, exclusively on the basis of their concentrations at 50% current block. Our new risk assessment diagram explains under which conditions blocking the L-type calcium current can delay or even entirely suppress arrhythmogenic events. Using machine learning in drug safety evaluation can provide a more accurate and comprehensive mechanistic assessment of the pro-arrhythmic potential of new drugs. Our study shapes the way towards establishing science-based criteria to accelerate drug development, design safer drugs, and reduce heart rhythm disorders.


JAMA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 308 (11) ◽  
pp. 1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Hiatt ◽  
Allison B. Goldfine ◽  
Sanjay Kaul

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 837-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Vicente ◽  
Norman Stockbridge ◽  
David G. Strauss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document