Structural Style and Petroleum Systems of the Songliao Basin

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Dou Lirong ◽  
Li Jinchao
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. SAA89-SAA104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan W. Eichelberger ◽  
Amanda N. Hughes ◽  
Alan G. Nunns

Carefully selected 2D transects contain an abundance of structural information that can constrain 3D analyses of petroleum systems. Realizing the full value of the information in a 2D transect requires combining multiple, independent structural analysis techniques using fully interactive tools. Our approach uses quantitative structural geologic software that instantaneously displays structural computations and analyses, eliminating time-intensive manual measurements and calculations. By quickly testing multiple hypotheses, we converged on an optimal solution that is consistent with available data. We have combined area-depth-strain (ADS) analysis, structural restoration, and forward modeling of a structural interpretation of a fault-propagation fold in the Niger Delta. These methods confirmed the original interpretation and furthermore quantified displacement, strain, detachment depth, and kinematic history. ADS analysis validated the interpreted detachment depth and revealed significant layer-parallel strain (LPS) that varied systematically with stratigraphic depth. The stratigraphic distribution of the LPS was diagnostic of structural style and, in this example, discriminated against fixed-axis and constant-thickness fault-propagation folding. A quantitative forward model incorporating backlimb shear and trishear fault-propagation folding accurately reproduced folding and faulting in the pregrowth section and folding in the growth section. The model-predicted strain distributions were consistent with those from ADS analysis. The highest local strains on the back limb of the structure were spatially coincident with two backthrusts, which accommodated these strains. Animations of a more complete model including the backthrusts revealed that the backthrusts formed sequentially as rock passed through the main fault bend.


2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Norvick ◽  
M.A. Smith

Southern Australian breakup history is divisible into three phases. The first phase began with Callovian (c.159–165 Ma) rifting in the western Bight Basin. During the Tithonian (c.142–146 Ma), rifting extended eastwards into the Duntroon, Otway and Gippsland Basins. By the Valanginian (c.130–135 Ma), ocean crust formed between India and western Australia. Structural style in the western Bight changed to thermal subsidence. However, fluvio-lacustrine rift sedimentation continued in Duntroon, Otway and Gippsland until the Barremian (c.115–123 Ma) when these basins also changed to thermal subsidence. The diachronous progression of basin fill types produces a progressive shift in ages of potential source, seal and reservoir intervals along the margin.The second phase began during the Cenomanian (c.92–97.5 Ma) with uplift in eastern Australia, stress reorganisation and divergence of basin development. The Otway, Sorell and Great South Basins formed in a transtensional regime. These tectonics resulted in trap generation through faulting, inversion and wrenching. During the Santonian, oceanic spreading began in the southern Tasman Sea (c.85 Ma). Slow extension caused thinning of continental crust in the Bight and Otway Basins and subsidence into deeper water. Ocean crust formed south of the Bight Basin in the Early Campanian (c.83 Ma) and also started extending up the eastern Australian coast.The third stage in development was caused by Eocene changes to fast spreading in the Southern Ocean (c.44 Ma), final separation of Australia and Antarctica, and cessation of Tasman Sea spreading. These events caused collapse of continental margins and widespread marine transgression. The resultant loading, maturation and marine seal deposition are critical to petroleum prospectivity in the Gippsland Basin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document