Offshore Field Development

2019 ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Shashi Shekhar Prasad Singh ◽  
Jatin R. Agarwal ◽  
Nag Mani
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upendra Malla ◽  
Krishna M. Karri

Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) sizing and cost estimation has become a challenging task at the early stages of offshore field development. During the early stages of field development designer needs to size and estimate cost in order to decide feasibility of the project. This paper describes a step by step method used to size and estimate the cost of a new built (or) converted FPSO based on basic engineering, existing FPSO data and corresponding metocean criteria for a particular location. This step by step approach covers FPSO sizing, hull structural design, mooring sizing, topsides support design and steel renewal using offshore classification rules and regulations. FPSO cost is estimated based on the design particulars (i.e. hull weights, FPSO particulars, mooring sizes etc.) and current market unit rates. This approach is an effective means to size and estimate cost of an FPSO at early stages of field development which saves overall time and cost for a client.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiren Kasekar ◽  
Usama Ghauri ◽  
Michael Nevin ◽  
Raphaele Mel ◽  
Mattheus Uijttenhout ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lucas Cantinelli Sevillano ◽  
Celso Kazuyuki Morooka ◽  
Sigbjørn Sangesland

Abstract Rig costs account for a substantial part of the total cost of an offshore field development project. Systems and methods that can reduce the non-productive time are therefore of interest to operators. In deep and ultra-deep waters, the duration of drilling campaigns with multiple, closely located wells may potentially be reduced by optimizing equipment-retrieving procedures between moving from one drilling location to another. This may be achieved by not retrieving the whole drilling riser and the BOP to the surface. Instead, retrieving just a few joints and navigating the drilling rig with the drilling riser and BOP suspended may save several days of rig time. Previous works on this topic have investigated the riser response during the move and delineated under which environmental conditions (waves and current) this operation may be safely executed. The axial displacement of the riser column may be of concern, and it has been presented that the hang-off condition may substantially influence the response of the riser. Instead of looking at the riser hanging either from the spider-gimbal or from the tensioners, this work proposes to use the active heave compensation system of the drillstring to more efficiently decouple motions of the rig from the riser during the move. Thus, mitigating the riser response and enabling the navigation with the suspended riser and BOP to take place under broader environmental conditions. A commercial program for computational simulations of the riser dynamic responses was used in the study presented in this paper. A representation of the active heave compensation drilling system and the tool used to achieve this purpose were added to the model. The responses of a typical riser used in deep water were determined under several environmental conditions, and the responses of different hanging systems were compared. Results indicate that the proposed approach for suspending the riser may decrease the dynamic forces and stresses during the rig move. The ability of the modeled rig equipment to withstand the move was also investigated.


Author(s):  
M. Liu ◽  
C. Cross

Abstract Upheaval buckling (UHB) mitigation for trenched and buried pipelines can constitute a substantial cost element for offshore field development. There appears to have a variety of reasons for dual or more pipelines and umbilicals to be considered for installation inside the same trench. A single shared trench has been used for multiple pipelines not only for cost saving, but especially when constrained and driven by route corridor challenges. The common practice for dual pipeline trenching and UHB design is to either perform UHB design independently without due consideration of the pipelines in the proximity, potentially resulting in a compromised UHB mitigation design, or simply combine the uplift resistance required for each individual pipeline in the proximity to obtain the overall backfill/rock dumping to account for pipeline interactions. This paper re-examines the rationale of the normal practice and some fundamental aspects of UHB design for dual pipelines installation inside the same trench. The proximity effect on the uplift resistance is investigated with respect to pipeline spacing and burial depth. Its impact on the UHB mitigation is considered by a detailed analysis and a series of parametric simulations with respect to pipeline dimensions and gaps. The sensitivity of the soil slip failure angle and the dilatancy is also performed. Based on the theoretical analysis and FEA modelling, a model solution is formulated and proposed for evaluating uplift resistance reduction for multiple lines. The formulae are extended to deal with multi-layered soil and rockdump. A number of pipeline configurations have been discussed including a piggyback arrangement. A robust UHB mitigation and reduced optimum rockdumping can be achieved by considering the proximity effect through challenging the industry norms and common approach.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ohioma Arukhe ◽  
Saleh Abdullah Al-Ghamdi ◽  
Musa Mohammed Al-Nafisah

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document