After the Cold War: the defence industry and the New Europe

Author(s):  
John Lovering
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (0) ◽  
pp. 155-165
Author(s):  
Hong Mo Yoo

The Korean defense industry gained significant results since it had been launched in the 1970's with strong support of the government. However, in the early 1980's, as the international and domestic security environment underwent changes after the Cold War and economic growth became an urgent national objective, the civilian industry began to take priority over the defense industry. Accordingly, the Korean defense industry suffered a deep depression in the middle of 1980's and this trend has continued into the 1990's. Although some people have raised voices about the importance of reviving the defense industry, it still not perceived as an urgent part of the nation to be reactivated. Generally, the defense industry lacks political and systematic support.


Significance This follows Chinese troops' participation in Moscow's May Victory Day event. With Russia's ties with the West currently at their lowest since the end of the Cold War as a result of the Ukraine crisis and cooperation with NATO having suffered, the Kremlin's military relationship with China is taking on new significance. This year has seen Moscow and Beijing conduct their first joint Mediterranean Sea drills and further drills are planned in August. Russia and China now engage in at least one major joint ground force and one major bilateral naval exercise annually. Impacts Putin will use Beijing's military parade as a public relations exercise to demonstrate again that he has powerful international allies. In the long term, despite warming ties, China's increasingly sophisticated defence industry may start to challenge Russian defence sales. The Mediterranean and Sea of Japan drills are strategically chosen to catch the eyes of NATO and Japan.


1997 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 689-709
Author(s):  
Yves Bélanger

AbstractSince the end of the Cold War, the redeployment of the defence industry in a civilian economy has become problematic for governments that pursue conflicting industrial and technological strategies. This article looks at the current options as Canada reexamines its support for the defence industry. The author first presents a theoretical analysis of the issues, then compares the approaches of four of Canada's largest competitors in the production of military and commercial technology: the United States, France, Germany and Japan. The conclusions drawn from the study are explained, with particular emphasis on the need for Canada to develop without further delay a comprehensive policy in the area.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document