History and Physical Examination: Male Infertility

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahrukh Hameed Zargar ◽  
Faisel Ahmad ◽  
Mohammad Lateef ◽  
Tahir Mohiuddin Malla

Infertility is a serious problem of not being able to conceive despite regular intercourse for more than a year. Natural conception is seen to be achieved in 80%–85% of couples. About 15% of couples suffer infertility with male factor contributing to almost 50% of cases. Paradoxically, on traditional assessment, the underlying etiology of male contribution towards infertility remains unrecognized in 30% of the patients and thereby grouped as idiopathic. Diagnostics of male infertility cannot therefore be limited to usual semen analysis only. The spectrum of the recent research encourages the experts in the field to approach the Clinical, Molecular and cytogenetic shades associated with the problem besides secondary factors like life style and environment. Clinical assessment sums the medical history and physical examination of the affected individual. Molecular and cytogenetic analysis help gain new insights in understanding the problem and thereby an advantage for a successful assisted reproductive treatment (ART). Given the cost and burden ART puts in and prior to application of any invasive techniques, understanding precisely the etiology associated with male infertility is essential for the fertility specialist to circumvent inefficient or any unproductive steps in the fertilization process besides helping in counseling patients on their chance of success with the use of reproductive technology.


2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsin-Chieh Huang ◽  
Shih-Tsung Huang ◽  
Yu Chen ◽  
Yu-Chao Hsu ◽  
Po-Chih Chang ◽  
...  

The present study identified prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy for the treatment of varicocele-induced male infertility. All varicoceles were diagnosed and graded by physical examination and ultrasound. Pre- and postoperative analysis of semen specimens measured sperm density, morphology and motility. ‘Responder’ and ‘non-responder’ status was determined by semen analyses at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Varicocele Grades 1, 2 and 3 were found in 16, 36 and 28 patients, respectively; 49 patients (61.3%) were responders based on improved seminograms. Significant postoperative increases were noted in sperm density (from 18.20 ± 14.76 × 106 to 32.36 ± 24.81 × 106 mL–1; P < 0.001), sperm morphology (from 57.21 ± 17.35% to 62.66 ± 15.18%; P = 0.006) and percentage motility (from 29.89 ± 14.71% to 50.92 ± 19.30%; P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age (odds ratio (OR) 0.56; P < 0.001) and preoperative sperm density (OR 1.22; P = 0.001) had significant unfavourable and favourable associations, respectively, with the likelihood of successful varicocelectomy. Furthermore, a preoperative sperm density of 12 × 106 mL–1 as a cut-off point was able to predict successful varicocelectomy with a sensitivity of 77.6% and specificity of 77.4% (area under the curve = 0.85; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval 0.76–0.92). Age and preoperative sperm density are prognostic factors for successful varicocelectomy. The results of the present study may allow clinicians to predict surgical improvement in fertility in patients with varicocele.


Author(s):  
Jared L. Moss ◽  
Mary Kate Keeter ◽  
Robert E. Brannigan

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham

Abstract The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Fifth Edition, explains that independent medical evaluations (IMEs) are not the same as impairment evaluations, and the evaluation must be designed to provide the data to answer the questions asked by the requesting client. This article continues discussions from the September/October issue of The Guides Newsletter and examines what occurs after the examinee arrives in the physician's office. First are orientation and obtaining informed consent, and the examinee must understand that there is no patient–physician relationship and the physician will not provide treatment bur rather will send a report to the client who requested the IME. Many physicians ask the examinee to complete a questionnaire and a series of pain inventories before the interview. Typical elements of a complete history are shown in a table. An equally detailed physical examination follows a meticulous history, and standardized forms for reporting these findings are useful. Pain and functional status inventories may supplement the evaluation, and the examining physician examines radiographic and diagnostic studies. The physician informs the interviewee when the evaluation is complete and, without discussing the findings, asks the examinee to complete a satisfaction survey and reviews the latter to identify and rectify any issues before the examinee leaves. A future article will discuss high-quality IME reports.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Nikolai Leonhartsberger ◽  
Kadir Tosun ◽  
Germar-Michael Pinggera ◽  
Michael Mitterberger ◽  
Peter Rehder ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document