CVA Computations for One CDS in the Common-Shock Model

2014 ◽  
pp. 261-288
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Marco Lippi

High-dimensional dynamic factor models have their origin in macroeconomics, more specifically in empirical research on business cycles. The central idea, going back to the work of Burns and Mitchell in the 1940s, is that the fluctuations of all the macro and sectoral variables in the economy are driven by a “reference cycle,” that is, a one-dimensional latent cause of variation. After a fairly long process of generalization and formalization, the literature settled at the beginning of the 2000s on a model in which (a) both n, the number of variables in the data set, and T, the number of observations for each variable, may be large; (b) all the variables in the data set depend dynamically on a fixed, independent of n, number of common shocks, plus variable-specific, usually called idiosyncratic, components. The structure of the model can be exemplified as follows: (*)xit=αiut+βiut−1+ξit,i=1,…,n,t=1,…,T, where the observable variables xit are driven by the white noise ut, which is common to all the variables, the common shock, and by the idiosyncratic component ξit. The common shock ut is orthogonal to the idiosyncratic components ξit, the idiosyncratic components are mutually orthogonal (or weakly correlated). Last, the variations of the common shock ut affect the variable xitdynamically, that is, through the lag polynomial αi+βiL. Asymptotic results for high-dimensional factor models, consistency of estimators of the common shocks in particular, are obtained for both n and T tending to infinity. The time-domain approach to these factor models is based on the transformation of dynamic equations into static representations. For example, equation (∗) becomes xit=αiF1t+βiF2t+ξit,F1t=ut,F2t=ut−1. Instead of the dynamic equation (∗) there is now a static equation, while instead of the white noise ut there are now two factors, also called static factors, which are dynamically linked: F1t=ut,F2t=F1,t−1. This transformation into a static representation, whose general form is xit=λi1F1t+⋯+λirFrt+ξit, is extremely convenient for estimation and forecasting of high-dimensional dynamic factor models. In particular, the factors Fjt and the loadings λij can be consistently estimated from the principal components of the observable variables xit. Assumption allowing consistent estimation of the factors and loadings are discussed in detail. Moreover, it is argued that in general the vector of the factors is singular; that is, it is driven by a number of shocks smaller than its dimension. This fact has very important consequences. In particular, singularity implies that the fundamentalness problem, which is hard to solve in structural vector autoregressive (VAR) analysis of macroeconomic aggregates, disappears when the latter are studied as part of a high-dimensional dynamic factor model.


2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Hénin ◽  
Thomas Weitzenblum

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-31
Author(s):  
Benjamin Avanzi ◽  
Greg Taylor ◽  
Phuong Anh Vu ◽  
Bernard Wong

Abstract Introducing common shocks is a popular dependence modelling approach, with some recent applications in loss reserving. The main advantage of this approach is the ability to capture structural dependence coming from known relationships. In addition, it helps with the parsimonious construction of correlation matrices of large dimensions. However, complications arise in the presence of “unbalanced data”, that is, when (expected) magnitude of observations over a single triangle, or between triangles, can vary substantially. Specifically, if a single common shock is applied to all of these cells, it can contribute insignificantly to the larger values and/or swamp the smaller ones, unless careful adjustments are made. This problem is further complicated in applications involving negative claim amounts. In this paper, we address this problem in the loss reserving context using a common shock Tweedie approach for unbalanced data. We show that the solution not only provides a much better balance of the common shock proportions relative to the unbalanced data, but it is also parsimonious. Finally, the common shock Tweedie model also provides distributional tractability.


Policy Papers ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (93) ◽  
Author(s):  

As foreshadowed in the Executive Board Report to the IMFC on the Fund’s Mandate, this technical note sketches the procedures under which synchronized approval of Flexible Credit Line (FCL) arrangements for multiple member countries could be undertaken under the existing FCL Decision and other Fund policies.1 When multiple members face the same shock, synchronized approval of FCL arrangements could strengthen the effectiveness of the response to the common shock and minimize first-mover problems. This technical note neither modifies existing Fund policies, nor establishes a new financing instrument.


2018 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Genest ◽  
Mhamed Mesfioui ◽  
Juliana Schulz
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naomi R. Rothenberg

ABSTRACT This paper studies the effect of performance measurement error and bias on the principal's preference for a leader, who signals private information about a favorable common shock to a follower. Without a leader, both agents are privately informed and relative performance evaluation is optimal due to its ability to remove the common shock. An increase in the conservative bias can increase or decrease compensation, depending on the likelihood of the common shock. With leading by example, joint performance evaluation can be optimal for the leader, reducing the leader's incentives to free ride on the follower and an increase in the conservative bias reduces compensation. The principal prefers a leader if the likelihood of the common shock is low, or if agents' outputs are more likely to be independent. Further, the more accurate the performance measure, the principal's preference for a leader decreases, but the effect of conservatism is mixed. JEL Classifications: D23; D82; J33; M41.


2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 209-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Lindskog ◽  
Alexander J. McNeil

The idea of using common Poisson shock processes to model dependent event frequencies is well known in the reliability literature. In this paper we examine these models in the context of insurance loss modelling and credit risk modelling. To do this we set up a very general common shock framework for losses of a number of different types that allows for both dependence in loss frequencies across types and dependence in loss severities. Our aims are threefold: to demonstrate that the common shock model is a very natural way of approaching the modelling of dependent losses in an insurance or risk management context; to provide a summary of some analytical results concerning the nature of the dependence implied by the common shock specification; to examine the aggregate loss distribution that results from the model and its sensitivity to the specification of the model parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document