Localization of Steroid Binding in Prostatic Carcinoma by Histochemistry: Therapeutic Implications *

Author(s):  
Louis P. Pertschuk ◽  
Richard J. Macchia ◽  
Karen B. Eisenberg
1985 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 840-841
Author(s):  
L.P. Pertschuk ◽  
K.B. Eisenberg ◽  
R.J. Macchia ◽  
J.G. Feldman

The Prostate ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis P. Pertschuk ◽  
Karen B. Eisenberg ◽  
Richard J. Macchia ◽  
Joseph G. Feldman

1993 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Cipolla ◽  
F. Guillé ◽  
J.-Ph. Moulinoux ◽  
V. Quemener ◽  
F. Staerman ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
W. Allen Shannon ◽  
José A. Serrano ◽  
Hannah L. Wasserkrug ◽  
Anna A. Serrano ◽  
Arnold M. Seligman

During the design and synthesis of new chemotherapeutic agents for prostatic carcinoma based on phosphorylated agents which might be enzyme-activated to cytotoxicity, phosphorylcholine, [(CH3)3+NCH2CH2OPO3Ca]Cl-, has been indicated to be a very specific substrate for prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). This phenomenon has led to the development of specific histochemical and ultracytochemical methods for PAP using modifications of the Gomori lead method for acid phosphatase. Comparative histochemical results in prostate and kidney of the rat have been published earlier with phosphorylcholine (PC) and β-glycerophosphate (βGP). We now report the ultracytochemical results.Minced tissues were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde-0.1 M phosphate buffered (pH 7.4) for 1.5 hr and rinsed overnight in several changes of 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 7.5% sucrose. Tissues were incubated 30 min to 2 hr in Gomori acid phosphatase medium (2) containing 0.1 M substrate, either PC or βGP.


2011 ◽  
Vol 42 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Bittner ◽  
K.G. Höhn ◽  
K. Göbel ◽  
H. Wiendl ◽  
S.G. Meuth

1999 ◽  
Vol Volume 17 (Number 4) ◽  
pp. 0327-0338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Harper ◽  
John E. Buster ◽  
Peter R. Casson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document