Natural Chemical Cues for Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine-Invertebrate Larvae

Author(s):  
Michael Hadfield ◽  
Valerie Paul
1984 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
pp. 1205-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fu-Shiang Chia ◽  
John Buckland-Nicks ◽  
Craig M. Young

Marine invertebrate larvae swim by using cilia or muscles, or a combination of these. The effectiveness of cilia as locomotory organelles diminishes with increasing body size above 1 mm. Thus, larvae propelled by cilia are small and, owing to the small Reynold's numbers that operate in this size range, their movements are governed by viscous forces rather than inertial ones. Cilia may be distributed uniformly over the surface of the larva and (or) localized on rings, bands, arms, or lobes. During development the pattern of ciliation may change; this often increases the swimming ability of the larva, particularly its manoeuverability. In many cases, redistribution of cilia coincides with the onset of feeding behavior. The locomotory currents produced by ciliary beating or the action of swimming appendages may simultaneously convey food particles to the mouth. Muscles may have enabled some larvae to exceed the size limit imposed by ciliary propulsion and also have enabled greater swimming speeds. Invertebrate larvae that use muscular locomotion possess some form of skeleton (hydrostatic, exoskeleton. or notochord) to provide the necessary resistance for muscular contraction. The density of most marine invertebrate larvae exceeds that of seawater, therefore, they must swim to stay suspended. A wide variety of parachute structures, density-reducing devices, and passive hydrodynamic mechanisms counteract the sedimenting effects of gravity. The timing of development in some larvae is such that when the tendency to sink exceeds the ability to swim, the larva is preparing for settlement and metamorphosis.


Biofouling ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
A S Clare ◽  
N Fusetani ◽  
M B Jones

The functional properties of marine invertebrate larvae represent the sum of the physiological activities of the individual, the interdependence among cells making up the whole, and the correct positioning of cells within the larval body. This chapter examines physiological aspects of nutrient acquisition, digestion, assimilation, and distribution within invertebrate larvae from an organismic and comparative perspective. Growth and development of larvae obviously require the acquisition of “food.” Yet the mechanisms where particulate or dissolved organic materials are converted into biomass and promote development of larvae differ and are variably known among groups. Differences in the physiology of the digestive system (secreted enzymes, gut transit time, and assimilation) within and among feeding larvae suggest the possibility of an underappreciated plasticity of digestive physiology. How the ingestion of seawater by and the existence of a circulatory system within larvae contribute to larval growth and development represent important topics for future research.


1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 1701-1719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Burke

The induction of metamorphosis by environmentally derived cues is reviewed in barnacles, molluscs, hydroids, echinoids, and ascidians in the context of the neurological and behavioral model of stimulus and response. The model proposes that cues associated with preferred juvenile or adult habitats are the stimuli. Stimuli are received by receptors that communicate with the effectors of metamorphosis, larval and adult tissues. The response is a combination of morphogenetic, histolytic, and histogenic processes. Receptors in all five taxa are assumed to be superficial sensory receptors, though there is no direct evidence for their involvement in the perception of cues. Although the induction of metamorphosis by environmental cues in all five taxa fits well within a stimulus–response model, there is currently only circumstantial evidence for neural or endocrine control of metamorphosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document