Field measurements of mean velocity and boundary shear stress with an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler

2014 ◽  
pp. 355-360
Author(s):  
J Petrie ◽  
P Diplas ◽  
M Gutierrez ◽  
S Nam
1967 ◽  
Vol 71 (673) ◽  
pp. 52-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. N. Rajaratnam ◽  
C. R. Froelich

It is well known that in the case of turbulent flow over smooth boundaries, the velocity distribution in the neigh- i bourhood of the wall is given by the law of the wall, c written aswhereuis the turbulent mean velocity at a normal distance of y from the boundary,u*is the shear velocity equal tobeing the boundary shear stress andρthe mass density of the fluid andvis the coefficient of kinematic viscosity. In the viscous sublayer, eqn. (1) becomesand in the turbulent flow region above the sublayer and the transition region, foryu*/v> 30, eqn. (1) becomeswhereAandBare coefficients.


1971 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Tien Hsu ◽  
John F. Kennedy

A primarily experimental investigation was undertaken to determine the internal structure of steady, quasi-uniform, non-separated, axisymmetric flows in circular pipes with sinusoidal wall profiles. The quantities measured include radial and longitudinal distributions of mean velocity, pressure, and total head; the Reynolds shear stress and all three components of turbulence velocity; and boundary shear stress and pressure. Two different wall-wave steepnesses were investigated, and a constant Reynolds number of 1·13 × 105 (based on the average pipe diameter) was maintained in most experiments. The boundary shear stress was found to be shifted upstream relative to the boundary wave, whereas the wall pressure is shifted slightly downstream. The turbulence measurements revealed that there is a central core extending over some 60% of the pipe radius in which the turbulence quantities are constant along the pipe. Near the boundary, however, the turbulence velocities and stress vary periodically along the boundary waves. The longitudinal component of mean velocity was found to be distributed radially according to the power law, but with an exponent that varies along each wave; a simple analytical model is constructed to predict the variation of the exponent. It was not found possible to relate the local boundary shear stress to just the local flow characteristics, since the convective or ‘history’ effects play a significant role in its determination. An empirical formula is derived relating the local boundary shear stress to the local velocity distribution and the first two derivatives of the boundary profile.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 812-818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sovan Sankalp ◽  
Kishanjit. K. Khatua ◽  
Arpan Pradhan

2016 ◽  
Vol 78 (9-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zulkiflee Ibrahim ◽  
Zulhilmi Ismail ◽  
Sobri Harun ◽  
Koji Shiono ◽  
Nazirah Mohd. Zuki ◽  
...  

Frequent floods around the globe including recent events in several states in Malaysia have damaged the residential properties, infrastructures and crops or even deaths. Clearing vegetations or trees on the floodplain has been pointed out as a contributing factor to the damages. Thus, the influence of floodplain vegetation on the river hydraulics during flooding must be better understood. The hydraulics of flood flows in non-erodible vegetated meandering channel was experimented in the laboratory where two-lined steel rods were installed along a riparian zone to simulate as trees. The stage-discharge relationship, flow resistance, depth-averaged velocity, streamwise vorticity and boundary shear stress patterns during shallow and deep flood inundations were studied. The findings showed that floodplain vegetation had increased the channel flow depth by 32% and its flow resistance. The velocity in vegetated zone was lowered and the shear stress reduced by 86.5% to 91% along the river meander. In addition, the trees also limit flow interaction between main channel and floodplain


2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Patnaik ◽  
K.C. Patra ◽  
K.K. Khatua ◽  
L. Mohanty

2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (F4) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Griffin ◽  
J. W. Kean ◽  
K. R. Vincent ◽  
J. D. Smith ◽  
J. M. Friedman

1968 ◽  
Vol 72 (696) ◽  
pp. 1059-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Rajaratnam ◽  
D. Muralidhar

Summary In this note it is suggested that the three-tube yaw probe be placed on the boundary and used as a Preston tube to measure the boundary shear stress when both its magnitude and direction are unknown. The calibration results necessary for this method are also presented herein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document