Energy production and distribution Priorities assignment for actions in a pipeline: A decision model to evaluate multiple objectives

2012 ◽  
Vol 178-181 ◽  
pp. 1898-1903
Author(s):  
Cheng Bing Li ◽  
Kui Yang

The urban transit network planning is considered as a group decision making problem with multiple objectives and multiple decision makers, due to the its planning characteristics. A new group decision making method is presented to overcome the problem in current group decision making. With the idea of integration and collaboration, the group decision making problem is turned into the group decision making with multiple objectives and decision makers, and the two stage decision model is established. The dynamic index is transformed into static index with the dynamic multi-valued context, and the first stage decision model is established by entropy weight theory. The weight is given by experts with cluster analysis, and the aggregation model of group decision making is established with relative entropy, in the second stage.


2021 ◽  
pp. 016224392110528
Author(s):  
Kjetil Rommetveit ◽  
Ingrid Foss Ballo ◽  
Siddharth Sareen

Recent efforts to involve digital technologies and renewables in the electricity grid have placed users at center stage in the legitimation of energy transitions. This move has been paralleled by an emphasis on users and energy practices in social studies of energy related to science and technology studies. This article builds on an eighteen-month Living Lab exploration of energy practices with smart electricity users in Bergen, Norway. We make two interrelated arguments. First, energy production and distribution in Norway and elsewhere is shifting toward greater automation of tasks, possibly bypassing the “active user” concept. Energy sector practices are evolving from simply extracting natural resources (Extraction 1.0) toward extraction of users’ behavioral data (Extraction 2.0), and privacy thus emerges as a key component in the stabilization of energy systems. Second, we reflect on displacements of the roles and possibilities of users (or “energy citizens”) thereby enabled, especially their normative (political and regulatory) aspects. We propose that conceptualization of energy practices be supported by the concept of regimes of engagement from pragmatist sociology. Relatedly, we argue that market, civic, ecological, and industrial regimes are being actively merged through digital innovation and what we call the techno-epistemic network of smart electricity.


2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Frombo ◽  
R. Minciardi ◽  
M. Robba ◽  
F. Rosso ◽  
R. Sacile

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 615-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Frombo ◽  
Riccardo Minciardi ◽  
Michela Robba ◽  
Fulvia Rosso ◽  
Roberto Sacile

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document