Compact shield tunneling method

Author(s):  
Setsuo Takaku ◽  
Masayuki Matsuura ◽  
Yasushi Nagashima ◽  
Yoichi Moriya
2014 ◽  
Vol 580-583 ◽  
pp. 1013-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Feng Su ◽  
Wei Ning Liu ◽  
Fu Chun Liu

Confronting with the difficulties of the construction metro station in the Northeast of China, a new idea of shield method combined prefabricated method is put forward. In the paper the research status of the underground engineering precast assembly technology was analyzed and classified firstly. The method of single round interval shield combined with open-cut (or covered excavation) prefabricated sections and on the basis of shield tunnel to build single arch station is especially worth studying and promotion. Then the key prefabricate theory needing to deal with such as how to calculating the spring stiffness and so forth of the calculating model. The key technology such as joint formation, waterproof and the other of shield method combined with prefabricated method was discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Yang ◽  
Yaowen Ding ◽  
Yusheng Jiang ◽  
Kuanda Fang ◽  
Linwei Dong ◽  
...  

In this study, the reasonable construction sequence of an overlapping tunnel shield is investigated. Taking the overlapping tunnel of Tianjin Metro Line 5 as the background, a three-dimensional numerical model was established using Flac3D software to study the influence of the “first up and then down” and “first down and then up” construction sequences of the overlapping tunnel on the surface settlement, stratum displacement, lining radial stress, and displacement. The research results show that the shape and width of the final settlement tank on the ground under the two conditions are basically the same, and the difference between the maximum cumulative settlements is small. The accumulated ground settlement caused by the first up and then down construction sequence is 1.8 mm larger than that caused by the first down and then up sequence. The difference between the two working conditions on the vertical displacement of the stratum mainly occurs in the middle stratum of the upper and lower tunnels, and the proportion of the strata in the uplifted state and subsidence state is different. The construction sequence has little effect on the radial stress on the lining of the upper and lower tunnels. Under these two conditions, the excavation of the second tunnel causes a small change in the radial stress of the preceding tunnel lining, both within 4.2%. Under the working condition of first down and then up, the construction of the second tunnel causes the lining of the preceding tunnel to rise by 7.2∼9.2 mm. Under the condition of first up and then down, the construction of the second tunnel causes the lining of the preceding tunnel to sink again by 9.1∼10.4 mm. By comparing the effects of the two working conditions on the stratum and the tunnel lining, it is recommended that the construction be carried out in the order of first down and then up.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 1155-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Li ◽  
Li Wu ◽  
Changmao Xu ◽  
Qingjun Zuo ◽  
Shuanglan Wu ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-470
Author(s):  
Shogo TANAKA ◽  
Tetsuya KANAMI ◽  
Yukihiro TERADA ◽  
Takaharu KITAMURA

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anh The Pham ◽  
Mitsutaka Sugimoto

The shield tunneling method is widely used, especially in urban areas, since it is efficient for minimizing disturbances to surroundings. Although segmental lining is commonly used in this method, in both the research and practice of tunnel lining design, the interaction between the ground and lining in the tangential direction remains unclear; that is, the mobilizing shear stress due to load models and the degree of the bond in the tangential direction. Therefore, to clarify the effects and mechanism of the tangential ground–lining interaction on segmental lining behavior, a parameter study was carried out, taking tangential spring stiffness, load models, soil stiffness, and shallow and deep tunnels as parameters. The interaction conditions were based on the existing literature. It was found that (1) the tangential spring has small effects on lining behavior, (2) the load model significantly affects the sectional forces, (3) the initial tangential earth pressure and slip ground–lining boundary provide more safety from a design viewpoint, and (4) in the case of shallow tunnels in soft ground, tensile stress appears in the lining. Therefore, it is important to take the tangential ground–lining interaction conditions into consideration during tunnel lining analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document