scholarly journals BIPHASIC EFFECT OF ADENOSINE ON CELL GROWTH AND CELL CYCLE OF HUMAN LYMPHOID CELL LINES: 219

1985 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 780-780
Author(s):  
Peter M Van Der Kraan ◽  
Peter M Van Zandvoort ◽  
Ronney A De Abreu ◽  
Jan A J M Bakkeren ◽  
Jan P R M Van Laarhoven ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
P. M. van der Kraan ◽  
P. M. van Zandvoort ◽  
R. A. De Abreu ◽  
J. A. J. M. Bakkeren ◽  
J. P. R. M. van Laarhoven ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
CW Distelhorst ◽  
BM Benutto ◽  
RA Bergamini

We determined the effect of cell cycle position on the amount of dexamethasone that was specifically bound by mouse and human lymphoid cell lines. Cell lines that were either sensitive or resistant to growth inhibition by dexamethasone were compared. Exponentially growing cells were separated by centrifugal elutriation into fractions that corresponded to different positions in the cell cycle. The cell cycle phase distribution of each fraction was estimated by flow cytometry and autoradiography. The amount of dexamethasone bound per cell in each fraction was measured by a whole cell binding assay. In three dexamethasone-sensitive cell lines (two mouse and one human), we found that the amount of dexamethasone bound per cell increased 2–4-fold between G1 phase and S phase, and then decreased during G2/M phase. Results were the same when the amount of dexamethasone bound per milligram of cell protein was measured. Binding affinity was the same during G1 phase and S phase, but the proportion of bound dexamethasone that translocated to the nucleus was greater during S phase. In contrast, we found that the amount of dexamethasone bound per cell by three dexamethasone-resistant cell lines (two mouse and one human) did not increase during S phase. Our results indicate that cell cycle changes in dexamethasone binding are not simply related to changes in cell protein or cell volume during the cell cycle. An increase in dexamethasone binding during S phase may be required for dexamethasone to inhibit cell growth, and a failure of dexamethasone binding to increase during S phase might represent a new mechanism of dexamethasone resistance in lymphoid cells.


Blood ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
CW Distelhorst ◽  
BM Benutto ◽  
RA Bergamini

Abstract We determined the effect of cell cycle position on the amount of dexamethasone that was specifically bound by mouse and human lymphoid cell lines. Cell lines that were either sensitive or resistant to growth inhibition by dexamethasone were compared. Exponentially growing cells were separated by centrifugal elutriation into fractions that corresponded to different positions in the cell cycle. The cell cycle phase distribution of each fraction was estimated by flow cytometry and autoradiography. The amount of dexamethasone bound per cell in each fraction was measured by a whole cell binding assay. In three dexamethasone-sensitive cell lines (two mouse and one human), we found that the amount of dexamethasone bound per cell increased 2–4-fold between G1 phase and S phase, and then decreased during G2/M phase. Results were the same when the amount of dexamethasone bound per milligram of cell protein was measured. Binding affinity was the same during G1 phase and S phase, but the proportion of bound dexamethasone that translocated to the nucleus was greater during S phase. In contrast, we found that the amount of dexamethasone bound per cell by three dexamethasone-resistant cell lines (two mouse and one human) did not increase during S phase. Our results indicate that cell cycle changes in dexamethasone binding are not simply related to changes in cell protein or cell volume during the cell cycle. An increase in dexamethasone binding during S phase may be required for dexamethasone to inhibit cell growth, and a failure of dexamethasone binding to increase during S phase might represent a new mechanism of dexamethasone resistance in lymphoid cells.


1990 ◽  
Vol 187 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaji Sawai ◽  
Kozo Takase ◽  
Hirobumi Teraoka ◽  
Kinji Tsukada

1981 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Matsuda ◽  
Izumi Akaboshi ◽  
Jiro Yamamoto ◽  
Noriyuki Nagata

1993 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1017-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigrun Gabius ◽  
Ralf Wawotzny ◽  
Sabine Wilholm ◽  
Ulrikc Martin ◽  
Bernhard Wörmann ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (9) ◽  
pp. 967-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Martínez ◽  
Chandima S.K. Rajapakse ◽  
Roberto A. Sánchez-Delgado ◽  
Armando Varela-Ramirez ◽  
Carolina Lema ◽  
...  

1982 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
M KOPONEN ◽  
A GRIEDER ◽  
F LOOR

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (18) ◽  
pp. 4872-4881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Husheng Ding ◽  
Jennifer Hackbarth ◽  
Paula A. Schneider ◽  
Kevin L. Peterson ◽  
X. Wei Meng ◽  
...  

Abstract The mechanism of cytotoxicity of farnesyltransferase inhibitors is incompletely understood and seems to vary depending on the cell type. To identify potential determinants of sensitivity or resistance for study in the accompanying clinical trial (Witzig et al, page 4882), we examined the mechanism of cytotoxicity of tipifarnib in human lymphoid cell lines. Based on initial experiments showing that Jurkat variants lacking Fas-associated death domain or procaspase-8 undergo tipifarnib-induced apoptosis, whereas cells lacking caspase-9 or overexpressing Bcl-2 do not, we examined changes in Bcl-2 family members. Tipifarnib caused dose-dependent up-regulation of Bim in lymphoid cell lines (Jurkat, Molt3, H9, DoHH2, and RL) that undergo tipifarnib-induced apoptosis but not in lines (SKW6.4 and Hs445) that resist tipifarnib-induced apoptosis. Further analysis demonstrated that increased Bim levels reflect inhibition of signaling from c-Raf to MEK1/2 and ERK1/2. Additional experiments showed that down-regulation of the Ras guanine nucleotide exchange factor RasGRP1 diminished tipifarnib sensitivity, suggesting that H-Ras or N-Ras is a critical farnesylation target upstream of c-Raf in lymphoid cells. These results not only trace a pathway through c-Raf to Bim that contributes to tipifarnib cytotoxicity in human lymphoid cells but also identify potential determinants of sensitivity to this agent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document