Translational Modeling of Anticancer Efficacy to Predict Clinical Outcomes in a First-in-Human Phase 1 Study of MDM2 Inhibitor HDM201

Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations occur in ≈ 25% of patients with AML and are associated with poor prognosis. Quizartinib is a once-daily, oral, highly potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor. In the phase 3 QuANTUM-R trial (NCT02039726; Cortes et al. Lancet Oncol 2019), quizartinib prolonged overall survival compared with salvage chemotherapy in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, negatively regulates the p53 tumor suppressor and has been shown to be upregulated in patients with AML; TP53 mutations in AML are infrequent except within complex karyotypes. Milademetan, a novel and specific MDM2 inhibitor, showed activity in an ongoing phase 1 trial in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [DiNardo et al. ASH 2016, abstract 593]. Preclinical studies have shown that quizartinib plus milademetan may act synergistically to target FLT3-ITD and restore p53 activity in FLT3-ITD/TP53 wild-type AML [Andreeff et al. ASH 2018, abstract 2720]. Targeting MDM2 may restore p53 activity in cell signaling pathways altered by FLT3-ITD in patients with wild-type TP53 AML. Methods: This open-label, 2-part, phase 1 study (NCT03552029) evaluates quizartinib in combination with milademetan in patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Key inclusion criteria comprise a diagnosis of FLT3-ITD AML (de novo or secondary to MDS) and adequate renal, hepatic, and clotting functions. Key exclusion criteria include acute promyelocytic leukemia, prior treatment with a MDM2 inhibitor, QTcF interval > 450 ms, significant cardiovascular disease, and unresolved toxicities from prior therapies. Dose-escalation (part 1) comprises patients with R/R AML. In part 1, quizartinib will be administered once daily in 28-day cycles, at 3 proposed levels (30, 40, and 60 mg) with appropriate dose modifications based on QTcF monitoring and concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors. Milademetan will be administered on days 1-14 of each 28-day cycle, at 3 proposed levels (90, 120, and 160 mg). Dose escalation will be guided by modified continual reassessment with overdose control. The primary objectives of part 1 are to evaluate the safety and tolerability, optimum dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dosing for the expansion (RDE) cohort. Dose expansion (part 2) comprises a cohort of patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML who have not received > 1 salvage therapy and not received > 1 prior FLT3 inhibitor, and a second cohort including ND patients with FLT3-ITD AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Patients in part 2 will be treated with quizartinib plus milademetan at the RDE doses identified in part 1. The objectives of part 2 are to confirm the safety and tolerability of quizartinib plus milademetan at RDE and identify the recommended phase 2 dose. Pharmacokinetics and preliminary assessment of efficacy are also being evaluated as secondary outcomes. Pharmacodynamic and biomarker assessments such as leukemic stem cell numbers, STAT5 downstream signaling, minimal residual disease measured by flow cytometry, and gene mutations will be evaluated as exploratory endpoints. Approximately 24 to 36 dose-limiting toxicity-evaluable patients are needed in part 1 to determine the MTDs and the RDE; approximately 40 patients per cohort will be treated at the RDE in part 2. This study is currently recruiting at multiple sites in the United States for part 1; recruitment for part 2 may be expanded to additional sites worldwide as necessary. Disclosures Daver: Jazz: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hanmi Pharm Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOHLA: Research Funding. Graydon:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Dawra:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment; Pfizer Inc: Employment. Xie:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Kumar:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Andreeff:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Reata: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Download Full-text

Results of a first-in-human phase I study of SRF231, a fully human, high-affinity anti-CD47 antibody.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.3064 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 3064-3064

Author(s):

Amita Patnaik ◽

Anna Spreafico ◽

Alison M. Paterson ◽

Marisa Peluso ◽

Jou-Ku Chung ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Safety Data ◽

Receptor Occupancy ◽

Weekly Dose ◽

Weekly Schedule ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

High Affinity ◽

Grade 3

3064 Background: CD47 is a transmembrane protein that acts as a “Don’t Eat Me” signal to evade immune recognition. It is overexpressed in multiple cancer subtypes and is associated with poor prognosis. SRF231 is an investigational, fully human, high-affinity CD47-targeting antibody that delivers an activating signal to myeloid cells and displays favorable preclinical characteristics regarding its receptor occupancy/tumor exposure/efficacy relationship. Methods: In a Phase 1 study, SRF231-101 (NCT03512340), patients with advanced solid and hematologic malignancies who had failed standard therapy were enrolled in dose escalation cohorts (accelerated single-patient followed by standard 3+3) to establish the preliminary safety of SRF231 as a monotherapy and identify a dose and schedule suitable for expansion. In addition to collection of safety data, clinical outcomes were evaluated based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) and SRF231 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (receptor occupancy) analyses were performed. Results: As of January 11, 2020, a total of 46 patients were enrolled, 25 in every-3-week intravenous (IV) dosing schedules and 21 in weekly IV dosing schedules. Weekly dosing schedules also explored the use of a 1.0 mg/kg initiation dose. Other than one patient with recurrent follicular lymphoma, all patients had recurrent/refractory solid tumors. The most common treatment emergent adverse events across dosing schedules were low-grade fatigue (43%), headache (35%), and pyrexia (30%). On every-3-week dosing schedules, 2 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed: Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and Grade 3 hemolysis, both at a 12.0 mg/kg dose level. On weekly dosing schedules, 3 DLTs were observed: Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (6.0 mg/kg), Grade 4 amylase and lipase increased (4.0 mg/kg with initiation dose), and Grade 3 fatigue (4.0 mg/kg). The maximum tolerated dose was 9.0 mg/kg on an every-3-week and 4.0 mg/kg on a weekly schedule. Receptor occupancy was maintained at > 90% throughout the dosing period with a 4.0 mg/kg weekly dose schedule. Out of 37 patients who were response evaluable by RECIST, there were no complete or partial responders, although prolonged stable disease has been observed. Conclusions: Preliminary data from a Phase 1 study of SRF231, an anti-CD47 antibody, demonstrate that SRF231 may be administered safely and doses of 4.0 mg/kg weekly maintain > 90% receptor occupancy throughout the dosing period. Updated safety data, clinical outcomes, and PK/pharmacodynamic data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03512340 .

Download Full-text

Milademetan, an oral MDM2 inhibitor, in well-differentiated/ dedifferentiated liposarcoma: results from a phase 1 study in patients with solid tumors or lymphomas

European Journal of Cancer ◽

10.1016/s0959-8049(20)31080-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 138 ◽

pp. S3-S4

Author(s):

M.M. Gounder ◽

T.M. Bauer ◽

G.K. Schwartz ◽

P. LoRusso ◽

P. Kumar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Solid Tumors ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Well Differentiated ◽

Mdm2 Inhibitor

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Phase 1 Study.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.734027977.793562867 ◽

2019 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Sherene Loi

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽

Triple Negative ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Phase 1 Study

Download Full-text

Phase 1 study of the p53-MDM2 inhibitor AMG 232 combined with trametinib plus dabrafenib or trametinib in patients (Pts) with TP53 wild type (TP53WT) metastatic cutaneous melanoma (MCM).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.2575 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 2575-2575 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Stergios J. Moschos ◽

Shahneen Kaur Sandhu ◽

Karl D. Lewis ◽

Ryan J. Sullivan ◽

Douglas Buckner Johnson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Antitumor Activity ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Phase 1 Study ◽

Best Response ◽

Systemic Treatments ◽

Sequencing Studies ◽

Mapk Inhibitors ◽

Mdm2 Inhibitor

2575 Background: Large sequencing studies in MCM have shown a TP53WT incidence of approximately 80%. In preclinical TP53WT melanoma models, the oral p53-MDM2 inhibitor AMG 232 exhibited synergistic, cytotoxic-type antitumor activity when combined with MAPK inhibitors. This phase 1 study assessed the toxicity (CTCAE 4.03), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and preliminary antitumor activity (RECIST 1.1) of AMG 232 plus trametinib (T) and dabrafenib (D) (BRAFV600-mutant) or T (BRAFV600-WT) in pts with TP53WT MCM. Methods: Using 3+3 dose escalation design, pts with advanced TP53WT (using a CLIA-approved assay) MCM received AMG 232 PO QD for seven days of each 3-week cycle (7/21) at 120, 240, or 480 mg plus either T 2 mg PO QD and D 150 mg PO BID (Arm 1; BRAFV600-mutant) or T 2 mg QD (Arm 2; BRAFnonV600-mutant). Results: At the time of this analysis, 21 pts (median age, 58 y [range 24–76]; male, n = 11; at least 2 systemic treatments, n = 15) were treated. Arm 2 enrolled first: AMG 232 120 mg (n = 6), then 240 mg (n = 6). Due to chronic grade (G) 2 gastrointestinal toxicity, an intermediate dose (180 mg; n = 3) was determined as the preliminary MTD. Arm 1 enrolled at AMG 232 120 mg (n = 4), then 180 mg (n = 2). The most common reasons for AMG 232 withdrawal were disease progression (n = 8) and AEs (n = 4); 6 pts remain on AMG 232. All 21 pts had treatment-related AEs (TRAEs); the most common TRAEs were nausea (n = 18), fatigue (n = 17), diarrhea (n = 14), and vomiting (n = 13). The only DLT (Arm 2; 240 mg) was G 3 pulmonary embolism. Preliminary PK analysis suggests that AMG 232 exposure (area under the curve) is similar to that as monotherapy at the same dose, with no apparent drug-drug interaction between AMG 232 and T; analysis of D and T PK is ongoing. Of 21 pts, 6 had partial response (Arm 1/2, n = 4 [67%]/2 [13%]), 13 had stable disease (Arm 1/2, n = 2 [33%]/11 [73%]), and 2 progressed (Arm 1/2, n = 0/2 [13%]) as best response; 17 had tumor reduction (Arm 1/2, n = 6 [100%]/11 [73%]). Conclusions: In this population of pts with MCM, AMG 232 combined with D and/or T during DE was tolerable up to 180 mg QD 7/21 days, showing an acceptable PK profile and early antitumor activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02110355.

Download Full-text