scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of Milademetan in Combination with Quizartinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed (ND) or Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) FLT3-ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1389-1389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naval G. Daver ◽  
Weiguo Zhang ◽  
Richard Graydon ◽  
Vikas K Dawra ◽  
Jingdong Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Flt3 Inhibitor ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor

Background: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations occur in ≈ 25% of patients with AML and are associated with poor prognosis. Quizartinib is a once-daily, oral, highly potent and selective FLT3 inhibitor. In the phase 3 QuANTUM-R trial (NCT02039726; Cortes et al. Lancet Oncol 2019), quizartinib prolonged overall survival compared with salvage chemotherapy in patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML. Murine double minute 2 (MDM2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, negatively regulates the p53 tumor suppressor and has been shown to be upregulated in patients with AML; TP53 mutations in AML are infrequent except within complex karyotypes. Milademetan, a novel and specific MDM2 inhibitor, showed activity in an ongoing phase 1 trial in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [DiNardo et al. ASH 2016, abstract 593]. Preclinical studies have shown that quizartinib plus milademetan may act synergistically to target FLT3-ITD and restore p53 activity in FLT3-ITD/TP53 wild-type AML [Andreeff et al. ASH 2018, abstract 2720]. Targeting MDM2 may restore p53 activity in cell signaling pathways altered by FLT3-ITD in patients with wild-type TP53 AML. Methods: This open-label, 2-part, phase 1 study (NCT03552029) evaluates quizartinib in combination with milademetan in patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Key inclusion criteria comprise a diagnosis of FLT3-ITD AML (de novo or secondary to MDS) and adequate renal, hepatic, and clotting functions. Key exclusion criteria include acute promyelocytic leukemia, prior treatment with a MDM2 inhibitor, QTcF interval > 450 ms, significant cardiovascular disease, and unresolved toxicities from prior therapies. Dose-escalation (part 1) comprises patients with R/R AML. In part 1, quizartinib will be administered once daily in 28-day cycles, at 3 proposed levels (30, 40, and 60 mg) with appropriate dose modifications based on QTcF monitoring and concomitant use of strong CYP3A inhibitors. Milademetan will be administered on days 1-14 of each 28-day cycle, at 3 proposed levels (90, 120, and 160 mg). Dose escalation will be guided by modified continual reassessment with overdose control. The primary objectives of part 1 are to evaluate the safety and tolerability, optimum dosing schedule, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dosing for the expansion (RDE) cohort. Dose expansion (part 2) comprises a cohort of patients with R/R FLT3-ITD AML who have not received > 1 salvage therapy and not received > 1 prior FLT3 inhibitor, and a second cohort including ND patients with FLT3-ITD AML who are unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Patients in part 2 will be treated with quizartinib plus milademetan at the RDE doses identified in part 1. The objectives of part 2 are to confirm the safety and tolerability of quizartinib plus milademetan at RDE and identify the recommended phase 2 dose. Pharmacokinetics and preliminary assessment of efficacy are also being evaluated as secondary outcomes. Pharmacodynamic and biomarker assessments such as leukemic stem cell numbers, STAT5 downstream signaling, minimal residual disease measured by flow cytometry, and gene mutations will be evaluated as exploratory endpoints. Approximately 24 to 36 dose-limiting toxicity-evaluable patients are needed in part 1 to determine the MTDs and the RDE; approximately 40 patients per cohort will be treated at the RDE in part 2. This study is currently recruiting at multiple sites in the United States for part 1; recruitment for part 2 may be expanded to additional sites worldwide as necessary. Disclosures Daver: Jazz: Consultancy; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hanmi Pharm Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOHLA: Research Funding. Graydon:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Dawra:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment; Pfizer Inc: Employment. Xie:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Kumar:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Andreeff:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Reata: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of Milademetan in Combination with 5-Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3932-3932
Author(s):  
Courtney D. DiNardo ◽  
Rebecca Olin ◽  
Jo Ishizawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Sumi ◽  
Jingdong Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor

Background: The tumor suppressor p53, encoded by the TP53 gene, is negatively regulated by murine double minute 2 (MDM2), an E3 ubiquitin ligase. Deregulation of MDM2 results in the degradation of p53, leading to cessation of the protein's multiple tumor-suppressive functions, including the induction of apoptosis and reactivation of aberrantly silenced genes. Although TP53 is not frequently mutated in AML, p53 pathway dysfunction is prevalent, with MDM2 overexpression being frequently observed. Disrupting MDM2's negative regulatory effect to reactivate functional p53 is a promising strategy for the treatment of AML. Milademetan (DS-3032b) is a small-molecule MDM2 inhibitor that disrupts the p53-MDM2 interaction and has demonstrated single-agent activity in preclinical and clinical studies of AML. Survival rates are poor for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML or high-risk MDS which underpins the rationale for combination treatments to build on the efficacy of available agents. AZA, a hypomethylating agent, is part of the standard of care for AML and MDS. Reactivation of p53-inducible genes with milademetan combined with hypomethylation and direct cytotoxicity with AZA has shown activity in preclinical models of AML. Study Design and Methods: This open-label, 2-part, multicenter, phase 1 dose-escalation and -expansion study (NCT02319369) evaluates milademetan in combination with AZA in patients with R/R AML or high-risk MDS. Key inclusion criteria comprise a diagnosis of R/R AML or high-risk MDS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-2; and adequate renal, hepatic, and clotting functions. Additional inclusion criteria for newly diagnosed patients is ineligibility for intensive induction chemotherapy due to advanced age (≥ 75 years), congestive heart failure, or ECOG PS of 3 that is not related to leukemia. Key exclusion criteria include acute promyelocytic leukemia, central nervous system leukemia, unresolved toxicity from previous anticancer therapy, mean QTcF interval >450 ms for males or >470 ms for females, or prior treatment with an MDM2 inhibitor. During part 1 (dose escalation), patients with R/R AML or high-risk MDS receive single-agent milademetan (part 1; completed) or milademetan in combination with AZA at different dose schedules (part 1A; ongoing). Milademetan is administered as a single agent on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle (21/28 schedule) at a starting dose of 60 mg and escalating to 90, 120, 160, and 210 mg. Less frequent dosing schedules will also be evaluated, starting with the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) determined from the 21/28 schedule. In part 1A, AZA will be administered at 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or intravenously on days 1-7 of each 28-day cycle, with milademetan treatment on days 5-14 or 8-14. The primary objectives of part 1 are to assess safety and tolerability, determine the MTD of single-agent milademetan and in combination with AZA, and identify the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) for milademetan plus AZA. During part 2 (dose expansion), 3 cohorts of patients with either (1) R/R AML, (2) newly diagnosed AML, or (3) high-risk MDS will receive milademetan in combination with AZA at the RDE. The primary objectives of part 2 are to confirm safety and tolerability, evaluate response to combination treatment, and identify a recommended phase 2 dose. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of milademetan as a single agent and in combination with AZA will be evaluated in both parts. Approximately 80 patients are planned to be enrolled in part 1, and up to 40 patients are planned to be enrolled for each cohort in part 2. This study is currently recruiting in the United States. Disclosures DiNardo: agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; medimmune: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; syros: Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Olin:Spectrum: Research Funding; Revolution Medicine: Consultancy; Mirati Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Ignyta: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Clovis: Research Funding. Ishizawa:Daiichi Sankyo: Patents & Royalties: Joint submission with Daiichi Sankyo for a PTC patent titled "Predictive Gene Signature in Acute Myeloid Leukemia for Therapy with the MDM2 Inhibitor DS-3032b," United States, 62/245667, 10/23/2015, Filed. Sumi:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Xie:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment. Kato:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment; Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kumar:Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Andreeff:NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Reata: Equity Ownership; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy.

scholarly journals A Phase 2a Study of the LSD1 Inhibitor Img-7289 (bomedemstat) for the Treatment of Myelofibrosis

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 556-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Pettit ◽  
Aaron T. Gerds ◽  
Abdulraheem Yacoub ◽  
Justin M. Watts ◽  
Maciej Tartaczuch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Spleen Volume ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Equity Ownership

Ruxolitinib (Jakafi®) is the one approved therapy for myelofibrosis (MF) based on reduction of splenomegaly and symptoms but JAK inhibition has not proven to significantly modify disease progression. There remains the need for novel therapies with distinct modes of action that can improve the patient experience of MF and impact progression. Lysine-specific demethylase, LSD1, is an epigenetic enzyme critical for self-renewal of malignant myeloid cells and differentiation of myeloid progenitors. LSD1 bound to GFI1b permits maturation of progenitors to megakaryocytes and enables their normal function. IMG-7289 (bomedemstat) is an orally available LSD1 inhibitor. In mouse models of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), IMG-7289 reduced elevated peripheral cell counts, spleen size, inflammatory cytokines, mutant allele frequencies, and marrow fibrosis (Jutzi et al. 2018) supporting its clinical development. IMG-7289-CTP-102 is an ongoing, multi-center, open-label study that recently transitioned from a Phase 1/2a dose-range finding study to a Phase 2b study of IMG-7289 administered orally once-daily in adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF resistant to or intolerant of ruxolitinib. The key objectives are safety, PD, changes in spleen volume (MRI/CT) and total symptoms scores (TSS) using the MPN-SAF instrument. Inclusion criteria included a platelet count ≥100K/μL. Bone marrow (BM) biopsies and imaging studies (both centrally-read) were conducted at baseline and during washout (post-Day 84). The MPN-SAF was self-administered weekly. Phase 1/2a patients were treated for 84 days followed by a washout of up to 28 days. Patients demonstrating clinical benefit could resume treatment for additional 12 week cycles. Dosing was individually tailored using platelet count as a biomarker of effective thrombopoiesis. Patients were started at a presumed sub-therapeutic dose of 0.25 mg/kg/d and up-titrated weekly until the platelet count rested between 50 and 100K/μL. This preliminary analysis includes 20 patients; 18 enrolled in the Phase 1/2a study, 2 in the Phase 2b portion. 50% had PMF, 35% Post-ET-MF, 15% Post-PV-MF. The median age was 65 (48-89) with 70% males. The median baseline platelet count was 197 k/μL (102-1309k/μL). 12 patients (56%) were transfusion-dependent at baseline. Sixty percent were IPSS-classified as high risk, the remainder, intermediate risk-2. 71% had more than 1 mutation of the 261 AML/MPN genes sequenced of which 63% were high molecular risk (ASXL1, U2AF1, SRSF2) mutations; 31% had abnormal karyotypes. Sixteen patients completed the first 12 weeks; 4 patients withdrew, one due to fatigue (Day 33), one for progressive disease (Day 39), one due to physician decision (Day 76), one for an unrelated SAE of cellulitis (Day 83). All patients were up-titrated from the starting dose 0.25 mg/kg to an average daily dose of 0.89 mg/kg ± 0.20 mg/kg, the dose needed to achieve the target platelet count range; 17 achieved the target platelet range in a mean time of 45 days. Of patients evaluable for response after cycle 1 in Phase1/2a (N=14), 50% had a reduction in spleen volume from baseline (median SVR: -14%; -2% to -30%). Further, 79% (N=11) recorded a reduction in TSS (mean change -28%; -13% to -69%); for 21% of patients (N=3), the change was >-50%. Improved BM fibrosis scores at Day 84 were observed in 2/13 patients. Two patients had improvement in transfusion requirements. Plasma IL-8 levels were significantly elevated in 6/14 patients at baseline and dropped in a dose-dependent manner over 21 days in 5/6 patients. The mean duration of treatment is 166 days (14-539) at the census point in this ongoing study. Nineteen patients (95%) reported 358 AEs of which 22 were SAEs. Of the SAEs, 2 were deemed by investigators as possibly related: painful splenomegaly and heart failure. There have been no safety signals, DLTs, progression to AML, or deaths. This is the first clinical study of an LSD1 inhibitor in patients with MPNs. Once-daily IMG-7289 was well-tolerated in a heterogeneous population of patients with advanced MF and limited therapeutic options. Despite under-dosing and slow dose escalation, IMG-7289 improved symptom burdens in most patients and modestly reduced spleen volumes in a subset of patients. The Phase 2b 24-week expansion study with more aggressive dosing aimed at preserving safety and enhancing efficacy is open for enrollment in the US, UK and EU. Figure Disclosures Pettit: Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding. Gerds:Imago Biosciences: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI Biopharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Sierra Oncology: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Yacoub:Hylapharm: Equity Ownership; Agios: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Ardelyx: Equity Ownership; Cara: Equity Ownership; Dynavax: Equity Ownership. Watts:Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Shortt:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astex: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Gilead: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Natsoulis:Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Equity Ownership. Jones:Imago BioSciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Talpaz:Samus Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Imago BioSciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; CTI BioPharma: Research Funding. Peppe:Imago BioSciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ross:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rienhoff:Imago Biosciences: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.

scholarly journals Synergistic Anti-Leukemic Activity with Combination of FLT3 Inhibitor Quizartinib and MDM2 Inhibitor Milademetan in FLT3-ITD Mutant/p53 Wild-Type Acute Myeloid Leukemia Models

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2720-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Andreeff ◽  
Weiguo Zhang ◽  
Prasanna Kumar ◽  
Oleg Zernovak ◽  
Naval G. Daver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Combination Treatment ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Mouse Xenograft Model ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor

Abstract Background: MDM2, a negative regulator of the tumor suppressor p53, is overexpressed in several cancers including hematological malignancies. Disrupting the MDM2-p53 interaction represents an attractive approach to treat cancers expressing wild-type functional p53. Anticancer activity of small molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (DS-3032b) has been demonstrated in preclinical studies and in a phase 1 trial in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome. Quizartinib is a highly selective and potent FLT3 inhibitor that has demonstrated single-agent activity and improvement in overall survival in a phase 3 clinical study in relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) mutations. We present here the preclinical studies exploring the rationale and molecular basis for the combination of quizartinib and milademetan for the treatment of FLT3-ITD mutant/TP53 wild-type AML. Methods: We investigated the effect of quizartinib and milademetan combination on cell viability and apoptosis in established AML cell lines, including MV-4-11, MOLM-13 and MOLM-14, which harbor FLT3-ITD mutations and wild type TP53. Cells were treated with quizartinib and milademetan at specified concentrations; cell viability and caspase activation were determined by chemiluminescent assays, and annexin V positive fractions were determined by flow cytometry. We further investigated the effect of the combination of quizartinib and the murine specific MDM2 inhibitor DS-5272 in murine leukemia cell lines Ba/F3-FLT3-ITD, Ba/F3-FLT3-ITD+F691L and Ba/F3-FLT3-ITD+D835Y, which harbor FLT3-ITD, ITD plus F691L and ITD plus D835Y mutations, respectively. F691L or D835Y mutations are associated with resistance to FLT3-targeted AML therapy. In vivo efficacy of combination treatment was investigated in subcutaneous and intravenous xenograft models generated in male NOD/SCID mice inoculated with MOLM-13 and MV-4-11 human AML cells. Results: Combination treatment with milademetan (or DS-5272) and quizartinib demonstrated synergistic anti-leukemic activity compared to the respective single-agent treatments in FLT3 mutated and TP53 wild type cells. Combination indices (CIs) were 0.25 ± 0.06, 0.61 ± 0.03, 0.62 ± 0.06, 0.29 ± 0.004 and 0.50 ± 0.03, respectively, in MV-4-11, MOLM-13, MOLM-14, Ba/F3-FLT3-ITD+F691L and D835Y cell lines, all of which harbor FLT3-ITD or ITD plus TKD point mutations. The combination regimen triggered synergistic pro-apoptotic effect in a p53-dependent manner as shown by annexin-V staining and caspase 3/7 assays. Mechanistically, the combination treatment resulted in significant suppression of phospho-FLT3, phospho-ERK and phospho-AKT and anti-apoptotic Bcl2 family proteins (eg, Mcl-1), as well as up-regulation of p53, p21 and pro-apoptotic protein PUMA, compared to single agent treatments. Of note, the combination regimen also exerted a synergistic pro-apoptotic effect on venetoclax (BCL-2 inhibitor)-resistant MOLM-13 cells (CI: 0.39 ± 0.04) through profound suppression of Mcl-1. In an in vivo study using the MOLM-13 subcutaneous mouse xenograft model, quizartinib at 0.5 and 1 mg/kg and milademetan at 25 and 50 mg/kg demonstrated a significant tumor growth inhibition compared with vehicle treatment or respective single-agent treatments. In MV-4-11 intravenous mouse xenograft model, the combination of quizartinib plus milademetan showed a significantly prolonged survival, with no animal death in the combination group during the study period, compared to respective single agent treatments and untreated control (Figure). Conclusion: Synergistic anti-leukemic activity was observed for quizartinib plus milademetan combination treatment in preclinical AML models. A phase I clinical trial of quizartinib/milademetan combination therapy in patients with FLT3-ITD mutant AML is underway. Figure. Effects of quizartinib, milademetan and their combination on survival of mice intravenously inoculated with human MV-4-11 AML cells Disclosures Andreeff: Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy; Aptose: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Eutropics: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; United Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: GD2 inhibition in breast cancer ; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Reata: Equity Ownership; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: MDM2 inhibitor activity patent, Research Funding; SentiBio: Equity Ownership. Kumar:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zernovak:Daiichi Sankyo: Employment, Equity Ownership. Daver:Pfizer: Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy; ARIAD: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy. Isoyama:Daiichi SANKYO CO., LTD.: Employment. Iwanaga:Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.: Employment. Togashi:Daiichi SANKYO CO., LTD.: Employment. Seki:Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.: Employment.

scholarly journals Dual Inhibition of MDM2 and XPO1 Synergizes to Induce Apoptosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Progenitor Cells with Wild-Type TP53 through Nuclear Accumulation of p53 and Suppression of c-Myc

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2556-2556
Author(s):  
Yuki Nishida ◽  
Jo Ishizawa ◽  
Vivian Ruvolo ◽  
Kensuke Kojima ◽  
Rafael Heinz Montoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Wild Type P53 ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Background. MDM2 is frequently overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemias (AML) and suppresses p53-mediated apoptosis while p53 mutations are relatively rare in AML. MDM2 inhibitors as a monotherapy have shown limited efficacy in clinical trials in AML (~25% response rate) (Andreeff, Clin Cancer Res 2015). XPO1 transports around 300 proteins, including p53 and other tumor suppressors, from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Overexpression of XPO1 is associated with unfavorable outcomes in AML (Kojima, Blood 2013). p53 activation or XPO1 inhibition have been reported to decrease c-Myc protein levels through diverse mechanisms (Porter Mol Cell 2017 and Tabe PLoSOne 2015). Objective: We investigated anti-leukemia effect of dual MDM2 and XPO1 inhibition, with the intent to maximize the pro-apoptotic functions of p53, using the MDM2 inhibitor milademetan (Daiichi-Sankyo), and selinexor, a recently FDA-approved XPO1 inhibitor or its analog eltanexor (Karyopharm). Results: Treatment with milademetan and selinexor (1:1 molar ratio) induced synergistic apoptosis in AML cell lines with wild-type p53 (ED50, 89.3 ± 18.6 nM, combination index (CI), 0.60 ± 0.08). Activity in p53 mutant AML required 40-fold higher ED50 (3572 ± 1986 nM), reflected in an antagonistic CI of 6.94 ± 3.06. Knockdown of wild-type p53 by shRNA in OCI-AML3 (OCI-AML3 shp53) cells or presence of TP53 mutation (p.R248W) in MOLM-13 cells eliminated the synergistic effects, suggesting that normal p53 function is a major determinant of sensitivity to combined treatment. Next, we treated primary AML samples with milademetan and selinexor or eltanexor and observed that effects were mutation-agnostic (e.g. RAS and FLT3) except for TP53. Combined treatment significantly reduced AUC determined by absolute live cell numbers compared to each drug alone, and induced synergistic apoptosis in primary AML samples with wild-type p53 (ED50 values, 27.2 - 937.4 nM, CI, 0.51 ± 0.07), with similar efficacies in complex and non-complex karyotype AMLs (279.6 ± 94.7 vs 256.6 ± 56.4 nM, P = 0.84). In contrast, combined treatment showed antagonistic effects in primary AML samples with loss-of-function TP53 mutations (CI > 1.0). Immature CD34+CD38- AML cells were more susceptible to combined treatment than CD34- AML cells (apoptosis induction, 76.2 ± 6.7% vs 47.5 ± 6.8%, P = 0.0002) Mechanistically, combined inhibition increased p53 protein levels and accumulated p53 but not MDM2 protein in the nucleus compared to each drug alone. Combined treatment induced more TP53 target genes (MDM2, CDKN1A, BBC3, FAS and Bax) in OCI-AML3 cells with control shRNA compared with OCI-AML3 shp53 cells. Combinatorial inhibition showed much enhanced reduction of c-Myc mRNA and protein levels in OCI-AML3 shC cells compared with OCI-AML3 shp53 cells (82% vs 32%). In confirmation, combined inhibition reduced c-Myc protein levels profoundly in wild-type p53 primary AMLs (ANOVA P < 0.0001). In contrast, c-Myc reduction was not observed in primary AMLs with p53-inactivating mutations. Intriguingly, OCI-AML3 cells overexpressing c-Myc by lentiviral transduction showed greater sensitivity to XPO1 inhibitors and the combination compared to empty-vector controls, and baseline levels of c-Myc protein also negatively correlated with ED50 for combined treatment in primary AML samples (Spearman R = -0.5357, P = 0.0422). Conclusion: These preclinical data suggest that dual inhibition of MDM2 and XPO1 induces synergistic apoptosis through accumulation of nuclear p53 and suppression of c-Myc in wild-type p53 AMLs. A clinical trial testing this concept in AML is under development. Disclosures Ishizawa: Daiichi Sankyo: Patents & Royalties: Joint submission with Daiichi Sankyo for a PTC patent titled "Predictive Gene Signature in Acute Myeloid Leukemia for Therapy with the MDM2 Inhibitor DS-3032b," United States, 62/245667, 10/23/2015, Filed. Daver:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Hanmi Pharm Co., Ltd.: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy; Immunogen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOHLA: Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy. Lesegretain:Daiichi-Sankyo Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Andreeff:NIH/NCI: Research Funding; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; Reata: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Analysis of the Potential Effect of Ponatinib on the QTc Interval in Patients with Refractory Hematologic Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4441-4441
Author(s):  
Daryl Sonnichsen ◽  
David Dorer ◽  
Jorge E. Cortes ◽  
Moshe Talpaz ◽  
Michael W. Deininger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Cardiac Repolarization ◽  
Concentration Data ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Abstract 4441 Background: Ponatinib, an oral multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor. Preliminary anti-leukemia activity of ponatinib was observed in patients with refractory chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and advanced hematologic malignancies in a phase 1 study. Due to the QT prolongation noted with other TKIs, the effect of ponatinib on ECGs was examined in this population. Methods: This ongoing phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation, multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the safety of oral ponatinib administered to patients with advanced hematologic malignancies who failed available therapies. Patients received ponatinib orally once daily (2 mg to 60 mg) over at least 1 cycle (28 days) of study treatment unless an unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. Inclusion criteria required screening QTc < 450 ms and prohibited concomitant use of medications known to prolong QTc. For the last 3 cohorts (30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg), 12-lead ECGs (supine) were recorded using GE MAC1200 ECG recorders at the following time-points: C1D1 pre-dose (triplicate); C1D15 pre-dose (single); C2D1 pre-dose (triplicate); C2D1 2-hour post-dose (triplicate); C2D1 4-hour post-dose (triplicate); C2D1 6-hour post-dose (triplicate). Matching plasma ponatinib concentration data were also obtained at these time-points. This analysis of the cardiac safety of ponatinib only included patients who had replicate ECGs at baseline and a minimum of 1 additional on-treatment time-point with matching plasma ponatinib concentration data. The primary assessment was Fridericia corrected QT (QTcF). Results: A total of 81 patients were enrolled in the phase 1 study; 39 patients who received 30 mg or more of ponatinib daily were included in this analysis. There was no significant effect on cardiac repolarization as measured by the lack of a significant change in QTcF at all doses. Mean QTcF change from baseline was −10.9, −3.6, and −5.9 ms for the 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg cohorts, respectively. In addition, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models show the slope of the relationship for QTcF versus plasma ponatinib concentration was negative, indicating no exposure-effect relationship, with an estimated QTcF mean change of −6.4 (upper confidence interval −0.9) ms at Cmax for the 60 mg group. ECG data revealed no significant change in heart rate (+3.5, −3.3, and +1.0 bpm for 30 mg, 45 mg and 60 mg cohorts, respectively). There was no signal of any effect on atrioventricular conduction as measured by the PR interval duration (mean change: −0.4, −3.6, and −0.7 ms, respectively). There was a slight, dose responsive, non-clinically significant increase in QRS duration (mean change: −0.8, +1.3, and +3.6 ms, respectively) that may be due to variability secondary to the limited sample size. There were 2 subjects with new atrial fibrillation and new T wave inversion. These morphological changes likely reflect the patient population being studied rather than any potential drug effect. Adverse event (AE) reports from the trial had 3 patients with ECG QT prolonged (2 mg, 4 mg and 45 mg) documented as a treatment-related AE; 2 were grade 3 (4 mg and 45 mg). On review, all 3 patients were found to have baseline (C1D1) prolongation of QTc or were on concomitant medications associated with QTc prolongation. There were no clinical consequences of the ECG findings in these patients. Conclusion: This analysis of the QTc intervals of patients who received ponatinib 30 mg or higher in the phase 1 clinical trial revealed there was no significant effect of ponatinib on cardiac repolarization. Disclosures: Sonnichsen: ARIAD: Consultancy. Dorer:ARIAD: Employment. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Talpaz:ARIAD: Research Funding. Deininger:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ARIAD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding. Shah:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Bixby:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; GSK: Speakers Bureau. Mauro:ARIAD: Research Funding. Flinn:ARIAD: Research Funding. Litwin:ARIAD: Consultancy. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals A Phase 1 Study of Flotetuzumab, a CD123 x CD3 DART® Protein, Combined with MGA012, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2662-2662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Wei ◽  
Chun Yew Fong ◽  
Pau Montesinos ◽  
Maria Calbacho ◽  
Jordi Sierra Gil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Support Research

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and leukemic stem and progenitor cells typically express higher levels of CD123 than their normal hematopoietic stem cell counterparts, making CD123 an attractive target. Leukemic CD123 expression is associated with poor prognosis, high-risk disease, and increased risk of induction failure (Vergez et al 2011). Single-agent flotetuzumab, an investigational CD123 x CD3 bispecific DART protein, has shown evidence of clinical activity in a Phase 1 study of relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, flotetuzumab led to T-cell activation which in turn was associated with PD-1 induction on T lymphocytes, enhanced IFNɣ secretion, and upregulation of PD-L1 expression by AML blasts (ASH 2018 Rutella, ASH 2018 Uy). In vitro studies have shown synergistic T-cell mediated cytotoxicity of an AML cell line (KG1A) with flotetuzumab in the presence of PD-1/PD-L1 axis blockade compared to flotetuzumab alone. MGA012, also known as INCMGA00012, is an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody that has shown clinical activity in a Phase 1 study (SITC 2018 Mehnert). We hypothesize that combined checkpoint inhibition with MGA012 together with redirected T‐cell killing of CD123+ cells with flotetuzumab may show enhanced activity over flotetuzumab alone. Methods This is a Phase 1 dose escalation study designed to characterize the safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (if no MTD is defined), pharmacokinetics, and preliminary anti-leukemic activity of flotetuzumab in combination with MGA012, each administered intravenously (IV) in patients with R/R AML. Response evaluation will be determined by modified ELN 2017 criteria. Activity is measured by complete response (CR) (complete remission [CR], or CR with partial hematologic recovery [CRh], or CR with incomplete hematological recovery [CRi], or morphologic leukemia-free state [MLFS]) rate, relapse-free survival, or mortality rate at 1 and 3 months. The impact of flotetuzumab/MGA012 combination on overall survival and event-free survival will be explored. Eligible patients will consist of adults with relapsed or refractory AML (any subtype except acute promyelocytic leukemia) who have exhausted standard of care options. In Induction Cycle 1, patients will be treated with a step-up lead in dose of flotetuzumab, followed by continuous infusion flotetuzumab, starting at week 2 of Cycle 1 and continuing through each 28-day cycle. MGA012 will be administered every two weeks. Depending on response, patients will transition to either consolidation or second induction. Eligible patients who achieve CR/CRh/CRi can receive maintenance MGA012 alone for up to 12 months. Disclosures Wei: AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties: AHW is a former employee of the Walter and Eliza Hall Institute and receives a fraction of its royalty stream related to venetoclax, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Macrogenics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Fong:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy. Montesinos:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gil:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria. Perez De Oteyza:Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Rowe:BioSight: Consultancy. Wolach:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Speaker. Sun:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baughman:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. McNulty:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Bonvini:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wigginton:Western Oncolytics: Other: clinical advisory board; MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Davidson-Moncada:MacroGenics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals p53 Mediated Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cell Expansion Supports Acute Myeloid Leukemia Development

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Rasoul Pourebrahimabadi ◽  
Zoe Alaniz ◽  
Lauren B Ostermann ◽  
Hung Alex Luong ◽  
Rafael Heinz Montoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Osteoblast Differentiation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cells ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Mdm2 Inhibitor ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease that develops within a complex microenvironment. Reciprocal interactions between the bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (BM-MSCs) and AML cells can promote AML progression and resistance to chemotherapy (Jacamo et al., 2014). We have recently reported that BM-MSCs derived from AML patients (n=103) highly express p53 and p21 compared to their normal counterparts (n=73 p&lt;0.0001) (Hematologica, 2018). To assess the function of p53 in BM-MSCs, we generated traceable lineage specific mouse models targeting Mdm2 or Trp53 alleles in MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl and Osx-Cre;mTmG;Mdm2fl/+) or hematopoietic cells (Vav-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl and Vav-Cre;mTmG;Mdm2fl/+). Homozygote deletion of Mdm2 (Osx-Cre;Mdm2fl/fl) resulted in death at birth and displayed skeletal defects as well as lack of intramedullary hematopoiesis. Heterozygote deletion of Mdm2 in MSCs was dispensable for normal hematopoiesis in adult mice, however, resulted in bone marrow failure and thrombocytopenia after irradiation. Homozygote deletion of Mdm2 in hematopoietic cells (Vav-Cre;Mdm2fl/fl) was embryonically lethal but the heterozygotes were radiosensitive. We next sought to examine if p53 levels in BM-MSCs change after cellular stress imposed by AML. We generated a traceable syngeneic AML model using AML-ETO leukemia cells transplanted into Osx-Cre;mTmG mice. We found that p53 was highly induced in BM-MSCs of AML mice, further confirming our findings in primary patient samples. The population of BM-MSCs was significantly increased in bone marrow Osx-Cre;mTmG transplanted with syngeneic AML cells. Tunnel staining of bone marrow samples in this traceable syngeneic AML model showed a block in apoptosis of BM-MSCs suggesting that the expansion of BM-MSCs in AML is partly due to inhibition of apoptosis. As the leukemia progressed the number of Td-Tomato positive cells which represents hematopoietic lineage and endothelial cells were significantly decreased indicating failure of normal hematopoiesis induced by leukemia. SA-β-gal activity was significantly induced in osteoblasts derived from leukemia mice in comparison to normal mice further supporting our observation in human leukemia samples that AML induces senescence of BM-MSCs. To examine the effect of p53 on the senescence associated secretory profile (SASP) of BM-MSCs, we measured fifteen SASP cytokines by qPCR and found significant decrease in Ccl4, Cxcl12, S100a8, Il6 and Il1b upon p53 deletion in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl) compared to p53 wildtype mice. To functionally evaluate the effects of p53 in BM-MSCs on AML, we deleted p53 in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;mTmG;p53fl/fl) and transplanted them with syngeneic AML-ETO-Turquoise AML cells. Deletion of p53 in BM-MSCs strongly inhibited the expansion of BM-MSCs in AML and resulted in osteoblast differentiation. This suggests that expansion of BM-MSCs in AML is dependent on p53 and that deletion of p53 results in osteoblast differentiation of BM-MSCs. Importantly, deletion of p53 in BM-MSCs significantly increased the survival of AML mice. We further evaluated the effect of a Mdm2 inhibitor, DS-5272, on BM-MSCs in our traceable mouse models. DS-5272 treatment of Osx-cre;Mdm2fl/+ mice resulted in complete loss of normal hematopoietic cells indicating a non-cell autonomous regulation of apoptosis of hematopoietic cells mediated by p53 in BM-MSCs. Loss of p53 in BM-MSCs (Osx-Cre;p53fl/fl) completely rescued hematopoietic failure following Mdm2 inhibitor treatment. In conclusion, we identified p53 activation as a novel mechanism by which BM-MSCs regulate proliferation and apoptosis of hematopoietic cells. This knowledge highlights a new mechanism of hematopoietic failure after AML therapy and informs new therapeutic strategies to eliminate AML. Disclosures Khoury: Angle: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding. Bueso-Ramos:Incyte: Consultancy. Andreeff:BiolineRx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CLL Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-RDCRN (Rare Disease Cliln Network): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Leukemia Lymphoma Society: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; German Research Council: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NCI-CTEP: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cancer UK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Center for Drug Research & Development: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NIH/NCI: Research Funding; CPRIT: Research Funding; Breast Cancer Research Foundation: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Equity Ownership; Oncoceutics: Equity Ownership; Senti Bio: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eutropics: Equity Ownership; Aptose: Equity Ownership; Reata: Equity Ownership; 6 Dimensions Capital: Consultancy; AstaZeneca: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties: Patents licensed, royalty bearing, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Mdm2 inhibitor-DS 5272

Effect of the Cytochrome P450 3A4 Inducers, Rifampicin and Dexamethasone, on the Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic and Safety Profile of Bortezomib In Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983
Author(s):  
Andrzej Hellmann ◽  
Simon A. Rule ◽  
Jan Walewski ◽  
Ofer Shpilberg ◽  
Huaibao Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Proteasome Inhibition ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cyp3a4 Inducer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abstract 3983 Background: Bortezomib is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and 2C19 enzymes. Effects of co-administration of rifampicin (a potent CYP3A4 inducer) and dexamethasone (weak CYP3A4 inducer) on the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and safety profiles of bortezomib were evaluated. Methods: Patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in this open-label, 2-stage, parallel-group study. In stage 1, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive 3 cycles of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2) on d 1, 4, 8, and 11 q3wk either alone or in combination with rifampicin 600 mg once-daily on d 4 to 10 of cycle 3 only. Stage 2 patients received bortezomib at same dose and schedule in combination with dexamethasone 40 mg once-daily on d 1 to 4 and d 9 to 12 of cycle 3 only. Patients could continue with bortezomib monotherapy for up to 10 cycles in case of clinical benefit. For PK/PD, blood samples were collected before and through 72 hours following bortezomib administration on d 11 of cycles 2 and 3. PK was the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints included PD (proteasome inhibition) and safety. Results: 61 patients were enrolled (39 MM, 22 NHL) in the study. 13 were treated with bortezomib + rifampicin, 18 with bortezomib + dexamethasone, and 30 with bortezomib only. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced the mean bortezomib maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by approximately 23% (118 vs 93 ng/mL) and the mean area under plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUC72) by approximately 45% (223 vs 123 ng.h/mL). Co-administration of dexamethasone had no effect on mean AUC72 (179 vs 170 ng.h/mL). The mean bortezomib Cmax was 20% lower after co-administration of dexamethasone (140 vs 119 ng/mL); however this difference in Cmax was within the observed variability in Cmax during cycle 2 (CV=38%) and cycle 3 (CV=45%). Mean (SD) maximum percent proteasome inhibition (Emax) and area under percent proteasome inhibition-time curve from 0 to 72 hours (AUE72h) were comparable for bortezomib alone and in combination with rifampicin (Emax: 61.9 [4.56] vs. 62.3 [3.81] and AUE72h: 836 [323] vs. 777 [358]). Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the Emax (66.7 [4.27] vs. 61.8 [6.69]) or AUE72h (1329 [638] vs. 1157 [381]). Safety profiles were consistent with prior bortezomib experience in this population. Drug-related serious adverse events and treatment discontinuations were reported in 7/30 (23%) and 8/30 (27%) in bortezomib-only, in 3/13 (23%) and 3/13 (23%) in bortezomib + rifampicin, and 3/18 (17%) and 5/18 (28%) in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Investigator-assessed responses (CR+PR) were observed in 13/17 MM and 6/13 NHL patients in bortezomib-only, in 6/9 MM and 3/4 NHL patients in bortezomib + rifampicin, and in 10/13 MM and 2/5 NHL patients in bortezomib + dexamethasone subgroups. Conclusions: Co-administration of dexamethasone did not affect the PK or PD profiles of bortezomib. Co-administration of rifampicin reduced bortezomib exposure (AUC) by approximately 45%. Patients receiving bortezomib concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 inducers, such as rifampicin, should be monitored for reduction in clinical effect, while concomitant administration of weak CYP3A4 inducers, such as dexamethasone, is not expected to affect the bortezomib pharmacologic profile. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Discussion of Velcade in NHL subtypes other than mantle cell lymphoma is included. Rule:Johnson & Johson: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy. Walewski:Johnson & Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Investigators fee. Shpilberg:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Feng:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. van de Velde:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Skee:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Girgis:Johnson & Johnson: Employment. Louw:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Key Oncologics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Preliminary Results of a Phase 2 Study of PD 0332991 in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2940-2940
Author(s):  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Luciano J Costa ◽  
Nisreen A. Haideri ◽  
Georg Hess ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Oncology Research ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
D 20 ◽  
Ecog Ps

Abstract Abstract 2940 Background: PD 0332991 is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6. Inhibition of CDK4/6 phosphorylation of retinoblastoma (Rb) induces prolonged early G1 cell cycle arrest (pG1) and synchronous progression to S phase (pG1-S) upon withdrawal, which sensitizes human multiple myeloma (MM) cells to killing by bortezomib (B) or dexamethasone (D) in vitro and in animal models. Based on these observations, a phase 1/2 study in combination with B plus D in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory MM was initiated. The phase 1 part of the study (completed) determined the recommended phase 2 dose and schedule to be PD 0332991 100 mg QD 12 days on followed by 9 days off treatment in a 21-day cycle with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8 and 11 in pG1 and 15 and 18 in pG1-S (Niesvizky et al. ASH 2010). We present preliminary data from the phase 2 part of the study. Methods: Pts with Rb protein-positive, measurable (as defined by International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG]) progressive, relapsed or refractory MM after ≥1 prior treatment were eligible. Prior B was allowed only if there was a response and disease progression occurred off therapy. Pts received oral PD 0332991 once daily on Days 1–12 in a 21-day cycle in combination with intravenous B 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral D 20 mg administered on Days 8, 11, 15, and 18. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints include time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, duration of response, and safety. PD 0332991-mediated inhibition of CDK4/6-specific phosphorylation of Rb (pSRb) and Ki67 in bone marrow MM cells were also assessed. The phase 2 part of the study is a Simon Two-Stage Minimax design; 25 response evaluable patients were to be enrolled into the first stage. Results: 39 pts have been tested for Rb and 36 pts (92%) were positive. Of the 36 pts, 30 pts have been enrolled to date including 2 pts who did not receive the study treatment, and 23 pts are considered response evaluable as of the data cut-off. 56% of pts had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 1 and 8% had ECOG PS of 2. At baseline, median β2 microglobulin was 3.1 (range 1.6–26.2), median hemoglobin was 11.2 (7.2–13.6), median calcium was 9.4 (8.7–11.9). The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–8); 55% had received prior B. Sixteen pts have discontinued (9 due to progressive disease, 3 due to AE, 2 consent withdrawal, and 2 not treated). The most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (44%), nausea (20%), anemia, constipation, fatigue, and neutropenia (all 16%); 32% of pts reported grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia. IHC data showed on-treatment reduction in pSRb and Ki67 in MM cells from bone marrow of 3/3 patients with available samples. To date, 1 pt achieved a complete response (CR), 1 achieved a very good partial response (VGPR), 1 partial response (PR), 1 minor response (MR), and 5 stable disease (SD); 6 pts are too early for assessment. Conclusions: To date, the combination of PD 0332991 and B plus D has shown response in 4 pts with relapsed/refractory MM. The most commonly reported AEs were cytopenias, consistent with the known safety profiles of PD 0332991 and B. PD 0332991 inhibited phosphorylation of Rb and cell cycle progression in MM cells. The accrual to stage 1 is ongoing. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented. Disclosures: Niesvizky: Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hess:Pfizer Oncology: Consultancy; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Pfizer Oncology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Spicka:Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubczak:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Kim:Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Employment. Randolph:Pfizer Oncology: Employment; Pfizer Oncology: Equity Ownership. Chen-Kiang:Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding.

Phase II Study of the Pan-Deacetylase Inhibitor Panobinostat in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed and Bortezomib-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (PANORAMA 2)

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 814-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
Steven E. Coutre ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Treatment Phase ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Abstract 814FN2 Background: Patients with refractory multiple myeloma (MM) have limited treatment options and an extremely poor prognosis. A recent study of patients who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD, thalidomide or lenalidomide) demonstrated a median event-free survival of only 5 months (Kumar S et al, Leukemia, 2011). Panobinostat is an oral pan-deacetylase inhibitor (pan-DACi) that increases acetylation of proteins involved in multiple oncogenic pathways. Preclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic anti-myeloma activity of the combination of panobinostat and bortezomib through dual inhibition of the aggresome and proteasome pathways. In a phase I study (B2207) of patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with panobinostat + bortezomib, clinical responses (≥ minimal response [MR]) were observed in 65% of patients, including in patients with bortezomib-refractory disease. PANORAMA 2 seeks to expand upon these preliminary results and seeks to determine whether panobinostat can sensitize resistant patients to a bortezomib-containing therapeutic regimen. Methods: PANORAMA 2 is a single arm, phase II study of panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. Patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory MM (≥ 2 prior lines of therapy including an IMiD and who had progressed on or within 60 days of the last bortezomib-based therapy) are treated in 2 phases. Treatment phase 1 consists of 8 three-week cycles of oral panobinostat (20 mg days 1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12) + intravenous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) + oral dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). Patients demonstrating clinical benefit (≥ stable disease) can proceed to treatment phase 2, consisting of 4 six-week cycles of panobinostat (20 mg TIW 2 weeks on 1 week off, and repeat) + bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 22, 29) + dexamethasone (20 mg on day of and after bortezomib). The primary endpoint is overall response (≥ partial response [PR]), as defined by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 1998 criteria, in the first 8 cycles of treatment phase 1. A Simon 2-stage design is used to test the primary endpoint where ≥ 4 responses (≥ PR) in 24 patients are needed in stage 1 in order to proceed to stage 2, where ≥ 9 responses in all patients (N = 47) are required to reject the null hypothesis (overall response rate ≤ 10%). Results: A sufficient number of responses ≥ PR were observed in stage 1 to allow for enrollment to continue to stage 2. As of 15 July 2011, 53 patients with bortezomib-refractory MM were enrolled. Safety and demographic data were available for 48 patients. The median age was 61 (41–88) years. Patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 4 (2–14) prior regimens, and most patients (69%) received prior autologous stem cell transplant. Efficacy data were available for 44 patients. At the time of this analysis, 9 patients achieved ≥ PR (2 near CR [nCR] and 7 PR) as best overall response, and an additional 7 patients achieved an MR. Responders exhibited a long duration on therapy, and, to date, 8 patients have proceeded to treatment phase 2. The 2 patients with nCR have received ≥ 10 cycles of treatment (duration of therapy 190 and 253 days). Four patients who achieved PR have received ≥ 9 cycles (duration of therapy 155–225 days). Updated response data will be presented. Common adverse events (AEs) of any grade included, fatigue (52%), diarrhea (41%), thrombocytopenia (38%), nausea (38%), and anemia (21%). Gastrointestinal AEs were generally mild, with a relatively low incidence of grade 3/4 events. Grade 3/4 AEs were generally hematologic in nature, with grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia reported in 38%, 12%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Other common nonhematologic grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (10%) and pneumonia (10%). Of note, to date, a relatively low rate of peripheral neuropathy (17%) has been observed. No grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy has been observed. Conclusions: The combination of panobinostat and bortezomib is a promising treatment for patients with bortezomib-refractory MM. These data, along with forthcoming data from the phase III study of panobinostat/placebo + bortezomib + dexamethasone in patients with relapsed MM (PANORAMA 1), will further define the potential role of panobinostat in the treatment of patients with MM. Disclosures: Richardson: Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alsina:Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Ortho Biotech: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Weber:Millennium: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Gasparetto:Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Warsi:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Ondovik:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mukhopadhyay:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Snodgrass:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document