Effect of Exercise Intensity on Exogenous Glucose Requirements to Maintain Stable Glycemia At High Insulin Levels in Type 1 Diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. e83-e93
Author(s):  
Vinutha B Shetty ◽  
Paul A Fournier ◽  
Nirubasini Paramalingam ◽  
Wayne Soon ◽  
Heather C Roby ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Under basal insulin levels, there is an inverted U relationship between exercise intensity and exogenous glucose requirements to maintain stable blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes (T1D), with no glucose required for intense exercise (80% V̇O2 peak), implying that high-intensity exercise is not conducive to hypoglycemia. Objective This work aimed to test the hypothesis that a similar inverted U relationship exists under hyperinsulinemic conditions, with high-intensity aerobic exercise not being conducive to hypoglycemia. Methods Nine young adults with T1D (mean ± SD age, 22.6 ± 4.7 years; glycated hemoglobin, 61 ± 14 mmol/mol; body mass index, 24.0 ± 3.3 kg/m2, V̇O2 peak, 36.6 ± 8.0 mL·kg–1 min–1) underwent a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp to maintain stable glycemia (5-6 mmol·L−1), and exercised for 40 minutes at 4 intensities (35%, 50%, 65%, and 80% V̇O2peak) on separate days following a randomized counterbalanced study design. Main Outcome Measures Glucose infusion rates (GIR) and glucoregulatory hormones levels were measured. Results The GIR (± SEM) to maintain euglycemia was 4.4 ± 0.4 mg·kg–1 min–1 prior to exercise, and increased significantly by 1.8 ± 0.4, 3.0 ± 0.4, 4.2 ± 0.7, and 3.5 ± 0.7 mg·kg–1 min–1 during exercise at 35%, 50%, 65%, and 80% V̇O2 peak, respectively, with no significant differences between the 2 highest exercise intensities (P > .05), despite differences in catecholamine levels (P < .05). During the 2-hour period after exercise at 65% and 80% V̇O2 peak, GIRs did not differ from those during exercise (P > .05). Conclusions Under hyperinsulinemic conditions, the exogenous glucose requirements to maintain stable glycemia during and after exercise increase with exercise intensity then plateau with exercise performed at above moderate intensity ( > 65% V̇O2 peak). High-intensity exercise confers no protection against hypoglycemia.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alif Abdulrahman ◽  
Janisha Manhas ◽  
Hannah Linane ◽  
Mark Gurney ◽  
Catriona Fitzgerald ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe benefits of exercise for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) are difficult to balance with associated glycaemic excursions. The aim of this cohort study was to show that continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) could reduce glycaemic excursions in patients with T1D already using insulin pumps, exercising at moderate to high intensity.MethodsQuestionnaires were used to identify patients with T1D using insulin pumps and naive to CGM use, who reported regular exercise. Six were enrolled and trained on Enlite sensor use with Medtronic Minimed Paradigm Veo system and given activity trackers and written advice on adjustment of insulin or carbohydrate intake for exercise. Resting heart rate (HR) and age were used to determine HR surrogates of moderate and high-intensity exercise. They were to exercise as usual for 3 weeks (run-in week, week 1 and week 2) using the activity trackers and heart rate monitors. Problem areas in Diabetes, Hypoglycaemia fear survey II, Diabetes Technology Questionnaire and Gold scores were completed prior to run-in and at the end. The downloaded sensor glucose data were used to compare the change in time in range (glucose 3.9–10.0 mmol/L) from week 1 to week 2.ResultsFor the duration of exercise, this time in glucose range increased from 72±20 to 88%±16 %, p=0.05. The time in hypoglycaemia range (glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) went from 3.9±7.9 to 2.4%±4.8 %, p=0.39. The time in hyperglycaemia range (> 10 mmol/L) reduced from 24±19 to 10%±17%, p=0.04.ConclusionThese results demonstrate the benefit of CGM use for patients with T1DM doing moderate-intensity to high-intensity exercise.


2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (11) ◽  
pp. 4193-4200 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Fahey ◽  
N. Paramalingam ◽  
R. J. Davey ◽  
E. A. Davis ◽  
T. W. Jones ◽  
...  

Context: Recently we showed that a 10-sec maximal sprint effort performed before or after moderate intensity exercise can prevent early hypoglycemia during recovery in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, the mechanisms underlying this protective effect of sprinting are still unknown. Objective: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that short duration sprinting increases blood glucose levels via a disproportionate increase in glucose rate of appearance (Ra) relative to glucose rate of disappearance (Rd). Subjects and Experimental Design: Eight T1DM participants were subjected to a euglycemic-euinsulinemic clamp and, together with nondiabetic participants, were infused with [6,6-2H]glucose before sprinting for 10 sec and allowed to recover for 2 h. Results: In response to sprinting, blood glucose levels increased by 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/liter (P &lt; 0.05) within 30 min of recovery in T1DM participants and remained stable afterward, whereas glycemia rose by only 0.40 ± 0.05 mmol/liter in the nondiabetic group. During recovery, glucose Ra did not change in both groups (P &gt; 0.05), but glucose Rd in the nondiabetic and diabetic participants fell rapidly after exercise before returning within 30 min to preexercise levels. After sprinting, the levels of plasma epinephrine, norepinephrine, and GH rose transiently in both experimental groups (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: A sprint as short as 10 sec can increase plasma glucose levels in nondiabetic and T1DM individuals, with this rise resulting from a transient decline in glucose Rd rather than from a disproportionate rise in glucose Ra relative to glucose Rd as reported with intense aerobic exercise.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassie Maciel ◽  
Rebecca Salvo ◽  
Mark D Wilson

Abstract Background: Glycogenic hepatopathy (GH) is a well described, yet underdiagnosed disorder in type 1 diabetes. Erratic blood glucose values and high insulin levels promote the excessive deposition of glucose storage in the liver as glycogen, resulting in hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant pain and abnormal liver function. GH was first described with the introduction of insulin as a therapy to treat type 1 diabetes in the early 20th century. As our ability to effectively treat type 1 diabetes mellitus has improved, GH is seen much less commonly. Today, GH generally effects adolescent or young adult patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus and DKA. It is reversible with successful treatment of hyperglycemia. Clinical Case: An 18 year old woman with a history of poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus and frequent admissions for DKA was admitted for DKA and pyelonephritis. On admission, the patient complained of significant right upper quadrant pain and was found to have elevated transaminase values of: AST 1199 U/L (&lt;37 U/L), ALT 371 U/L (56 U/L), an elevated alkaline-phosphatase of 319 IU/L (&lt;135 IL/L) and normal indices of biosynthetic function (INR/PT). After inpatient treatment of DKA and pyelonephritis, the right upper quadrant pain persisted and required pharmacologic analgesia. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated severe hepatomegaly (24 cm in maximum length) without focal lesions. Laboratory evaluation for viral hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, Celiac Disease, Wilson’s Disease and hemochromatosis were unremarkable. Given the patient’s persistent symptoms and severity of hepatomegaly, hepatic biopsy was performed.Biopsy findings were consistent with glycogenic hepatopathy demonstrating steatosis and glycogen deposition with nucleic glycogenation and mega mitochondria.Our patient had higher than usual insulin requirements for type 1 diabetes (~1 unit/kg/day). Abdominal pain, hepatomegaly and elevated LFTs resolved over a 2 month duration with improvement in her blood glucose control. Conclusions: GH is an established yet rare complication of poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Glycogen deposition in the liver leads to painful hepatomegaly due to stretching of the liver capsule. GH has a female predominance (77%) and is characterized by elevated AST &gt;&gt;ALT with preserved liver biosynthetic function.It is postulated that GH is a result of elevated blood glucose levels and elevated insulin levels. The patient we describe has long standing poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus, frequent admissions for DKA and high insulin requirements. To our knowledge, insulin requirements have not been investigated or previously reported as a potential risk factor for this condition.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbora Paldus ◽  
Dale Morrison ◽  
Dessi P. Zaharieva ◽  
Melissa H. Lee ◽  
Hannah Jones ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: To compare glucose control with hybrid closed loop (HCL) when challenged by moderate-intensity exercise (MIE), high-intensity intermittent exercise (HIE) and resistance exercise (RE) while profiling counter-regulatory hormones, lactate, ketones, and kinetic data in adults with type 1 diabetes. <p><b>Methods</b>: <a>Open-label multisite randomized crossover trial. </a><a>Adults with type 1 diabetes undertook 40 min of HIE, MIE, and RE in random order while using HCL (Medtronic 670G) with a temporary target set 2 hours prior to and during exercise and 15g carbohydrates if pre-exercise glucose was <126mg/dL, to prevent hypoglycemia.</a> Primary outcome was median (IQR) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) time-in-range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) for 14 hours post-exercise commencement. Accelerometer data and venous glucose, ketones, lactate, and counter-regulatory hormones were measured for 280 min post-exercise commencement. </p> <p><b>Results</b>: Median TIR was 81% [67, 93]%, 91% [80, 94]%, and 80% [73, 89]% for 0-14 hours post-exercise commencement for HIE, MIE and RE, respectively (n=30), with no difference between exercise types (MIE v HIE; p=0.11, MIE v RE p=0.11, HIE v RE p=0.90). Time-below-range was 0% for all exercise bouts. For HIE and RE compared with MIE, there were greater increases respectively in noradrenaline (p=0.01, p=0.004), cortisol (p<0.001, p=0.001), lactate (p£0.001, p£0.001) and heart rate (p=0.007, p=0.015). During HIE compared with MIE, there were greater increases in growth hormone (p=0.024). </p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: Under controlled conditions, HCL provided satisfactory glucose control with no difference between exercise type. Lactate, counter-regulatory hormones, and kinetic data differentiate type and intensity of exercise, and their measurement may help inform insulin needs during exercise. However, their potential utility as modulators of insulin dosing will be limited by the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous insulin delivery. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document