Exceptionality of Distant Metastases in Node-Negative Hereditary and Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancer: Lessons Learned

Author(s):  
Andreas Machens ◽  
Kerstin Lorenz ◽  
Frank Weber ◽  
Henning Dralle

Abstract Context Risk factors of lymph node and distant metastases have rarely been analyzed in hereditary and sporadic medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) using large genetic-clinical data sets. Objective This comprehensive investigation aimed to explore risk factors of lymph node and distant metastases and interdependencies between age at thyroidectomy, primary tumor size, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis in patients with hereditary and sporadic MTC. Methods Comparative analyses of risk factors of metastasis, stratified by hereditary MTC (four mutational risk categories) and sporadic MTC. Results There were 1115 patients with hereditary MTC (307 patients) or sporadic MTC (808 patients). Age at thyroidectomy increased proportionately from 12.2, 22.7, 34.3, and 49.8 years for patients with decreasing mutational risk, as compared to 52.1 years for patients with sporadic MTC. Metastatic primary tumors overall were 10.7–19.4 mm larger in node-positive patients and 15.9–19.3 mm larger in distant metastatic patients at thyroidectomy than nonmetastatic tumors. Distant metastases were noted in 13–50% of node-positive vs. 0% of node-negative hereditary MTC, and in 23.5% of node-positive vs. 1.7% of node-negative sporadic MTC. In multivariable logistic regression analysis for sporadic MTC, lymph node metastasis contributed to distant metastasis (odds ratio 12.4) more than primary tumor size (odds ratios of 7.8, 5.5 and 2.4 for tumors measuring >60, 41–60 and 21–40 mm). Conclusions When thyroidectomy is performed before lymph node metastases have developed, distant metastases are exceptional, both in patients with hereditary MTC, irrespective of the level of mutational risk, and patients with sporadic MTC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (09) ◽  
pp. 588-593
Author(s):  
Andreas Machens ◽  
Kerstin Lorenz ◽  
Frank Weber ◽  
Henning Dralle

AbstractThe metastatic risk profile of microscopic lymphatic and venous invasion in medullary thyroid cancer is ill-defined. This evidence gap calls for evaluation of the suitability of microscopic lymphatic and venous invasion at thyroidectomy for prediction of lymph node and distant metastases in medullary thyroid cancer. In this study of 484 patients with medullary thyroid cancer who had≥5 lymph nodes removed at initial thyroidectomy, microscopic lymphatic and venous invasion were significantly associated with greater primary tumor size (27.6 vs. 14.5 mm, and 30.8 vs. 16.2 mm) and more frequent lymph node metastasis (97.0 vs. 25.9%, and 85.2 vs. 39.5%) and distant metastasis (25.0 vs. 5.1%, and 32.8 vs. 7.3%). Prediction of lymph node metastases by microscopic lymphatic invasion was better than prediction of distant metastases by microscopic venous invasion regarding sensitivity (97.0 vs. 32.8%) and positive predictive value (58.4 vs. 39.2%); comparable regarding negative predictive value (98.5 vs. 90.5%) and accuracy (80.4 vs. 85.1%); and worse regarding specificity (74.1 vs. 92.7%). On multivariable logistic regression, microscopic lymphatic invasion predicted lymph node metastasis better (odds ratio [OR] 65.6) than primary tumor size (OR 4.6 for tumors>40 mm and OR 2.7 for tumors 21–40 mm, relative to tumors≤20 mm), whereas primary tumor size was better in predicting distant metastasis (OR 8.3 for tumors>40 mm and OR 3.9 for tumors 21–40 mm, relative to tumors≤20 mm) than microscopic venous invasion (OR 3.2). These data show that lymphatic invasion predicts lymph node metastases better in medullary thyroid cancer than venous invasion heralds distant metastases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document