Post-discharge pharmacy follow-up helps reduce hospital readmission rates, study results suggest

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bita A. Kash ◽  
Juha Baek ◽  
Ohbet Cheon ◽  
Nana E. Coleman ◽  
Stephen L. Jones

Only one quarter of U.S. hospitals demonstrated low enough levels of 30 day readmission rates to avoid penalties imposed by the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) in 2016. Previous work describes interventions for reducing hospital readmission rates; however, without a comprehensive analysis of these interventions, healthcare leaders cannot prioritize strategies for implementation within their healthcare environment. This comparative study identifies the most effective interventions to reduce unplanned 30-day readmissions. The MEDLINE-PubMed database was used to conduct a systematic review of existing literature about interventions for 30-day readmission reduction published from 2006 through 2017. Data were extracted on hospital type, setting, disease type, intervention type, study sample, and impact level. Of 4,886 citations, 508 articles were reviewed in full-text, and 90 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the three analytic methodologies of means, weighted means, and pooled estimated impact level, the most effective interventions to reduce unplanned 30-day admissions were identified as collaboration with clinical teams and/or community providers, post-discharge home visits, telephone follow-up calls, patient/family education, and discharge planning. Commonly, all five interventions identify patient level engagement for success. The findings reveal the need for shared accountability towards desired outcomes among health systems, providers, and patients while providing hospital leaders with actionable strategies that can effectively reduce 30-day readmission rates.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian Shen ◽  
Gabriel Sullivan ◽  
Mark Adelsberg ◽  
Martins Francis ◽  
Taylor T Schwartz ◽  
...  

Introduction: Congestive heart failure (HF) is the fourth most commonly selected clinical episode among Model 2 participants of the Medicare Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) Initiative. This study describes utilization of pharmacologic therapies, hospital readmission rates, and HF episode costs within the BPCI framework. Methods: The 100% sample of Medicare FFS enrollment/claims were used to identify acute hospital stays with a MS-DRG 291/292/293 between 1JAN2016 and 31DEC2018. A HF episode consisted of the initial hospital stay and all Part A & B covered services up to 90-days post-discharge. Prescription fills for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) during the 90 days post-discharge were captured. Rates of all-cause and HF readmissions were reported per 10,000 episodes during the 30-, 60-, and 90-days post-discharge period. Total episode costs were defined as the sum of Medicare payments for the initial hospital stay plus all Part A & B covered medical services in the 90-day post-discharge. Results: The sample included 634,307 HF episodes. Patients received ARNIs in 3%, ACEIs/ARBs in 45%, and neither in 52% of the episodes, respectively. All-cause hospital readmission rates were 2,503, 4,465, and 6,368 per 10,000 episodes during the 30-, 60-, and 90-day periods. The 30-, 60-, and 90-day HF readmission rates were 958, 1,696, and 2,394 per 10,000 episodes. Total mean 90-day episode cost was $20,122, of which $8,002 was attributable to hospital readmissions. Conclusions: Hospital readmissions are frequent for HF patients and contribute a notable proportion of overall HF BPCI episode costs. BPCI participants may consider improving utilization of guideline directed medical therapies for HF, including ACEIs/ARBs and ARNI, as a strategy for reducing hospital readmissions and associated costs.


Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari D Moore ◽  
Bonita Bobo ◽  
Peter Rock ◽  
Elizabeth Wise

Background: The WHO estimates that only 50% of patients with chronic illness adhere to treatment recommendations. The Affordable Care Act targets hospital readmission rates as cost savings opportunities. Readmission rates reported in the literature range from 6-33%. Transitional care programs have been shown to improve patient outcomes. Purpose: To reduce readmission and recurrent stroke, the Stroke Patient Education and Navigation (SPEN) Project sought to enhance the continuum of care post discharge by forming collaboration between the University of Louisville Stroke Center (UL), Taylor Regional Hospital (TRH) and the Department for Public Health. Primary outcomes of this three-year project were hospital readmission, medication adherence, utilization of community resources, and National Quality Forum (NQF) 18: blood pressure less than 140/90. Methods: Stroke patients transferred from TRH to UL discharged home from October 2013 to January 2015 were invited to participate. After discharge nurses made 3 home visits at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months to assess outcomes, biometrics, and blood pressure self-management. A follow up phone call was made at one year. Results: 44 patients participated (mean age 70, 28 male, 16 female). 32/44 (73%) completed all 3 visits. 36/44 (82%) with medication adherence. 2/44 (5%) readmitted within 30 days (1 with TIA and 1 with pneumonia). 2/24 (8%) participated in a community resource (smoking cessation program and diabetes classes). Reasons for not using community resources were lack of transportation and “not needed”. Results of NQF 18 goals achieved: 29/44 (66%) at visit 1 and 12/28 (43%) for all 3 visits. At one-year post discharge 10 patients had been readmitted, 3 for vascular events (1 TIA, 1 MI, 1 HTN). Cost of project per patient was $306.62. Conclusions: the SPEN project achieved low 30-day readmission rate and positive medication compliance, but did not achieve utilization of community resources or satisfactory NQF 18 results. Future projects should consider methods to improve resource utilization and cost effective methods of follow-up, such as multiple telephone or telehealth interactions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 532-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca L. Wingard ◽  
Kathryn McDougall ◽  
Billie Axley ◽  
Andrew Howard ◽  
Cathleen O''Keefe ◽  
...  

Background: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have high hospitalization rates. This nonrandomized trial tested the effect of a bundle of renal-specific “Right TraC™” strategies on 30-day all-cause readmission rates and, secondarily, 90-day readmissions and overall admissions among HD patients. Methods: Twenty-six Fresenius clinics in West Virginia, Ohio, and Kentucky participated in the interventions. Eighteen matched clinics served as controls; intervention clinics also served as their own controls. We deployed the intervention in 3 incremental phases focused on patient information exchange, post-hospital follow-up, and telephonic case management. Thirty-day hospital readmissions per patient year (ppy) were calculated by dividing the total number of readmissions within 30 days of index admission by the total number of patient-years in baseline (2012) and remeasurement (2014) periods. We also compared readmission rates from 2010 to 2015. We used repeated measures Poisson regression to compare outcomes between groups and time periods. Results: From 2012 to 2014, 30-day all-cause readmissions ppy declined for Right TraC clinics (from 0.88 to 0.66 [p < 0.001]; for controls, from 0.73 to 0.61 [p = 0.16]). Difference in change between groups was nonsignificant (p = 0.26). Overall admissions ppy declined: for Right TraC clinics from 2.51 to 1.97 (p < 0.001); for controls from 2.14 to1.92 (p = 0.21); difference in change between groups was significant (p = 0.01). For 2010, 2011, and 2012, Right TraC clinic 30-day readmissions ppy were unchanged: 0.89, 1.00, 0.88 (p = 0.61 and p = 0.49); they declined to 0.66 (p < 0.001) in 2014 (intervention year); rose to 0.70 (p = 0.06) in 2015 (interventions discontinued). Conclusion: We conclude that Right TraC interventions may have been helpful in reducing hospital readmission rates.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Allen ◽  
Todd Barron ◽  
Ashley Mo ◽  
Richard Tangel ◽  
Ruth Linde ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 194187442110366
Author(s):  
Ann M. Leonhardt-Caprio ◽  
Craig R. Sellers ◽  
Elizabeth Palermo ◽  
Thomas V. Caprio ◽  
Robert G. Holloway

Background: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a common cause of hospitalization which carries a significant economic burden and leads to high rates of death and disability. Readmission in the first 30 days after hospitalization is associated with increased healthcare costs and higher risk of death and disability. Efforts to decrease the number of patients returning to the hospital after IS may improve quality and cost of care. Methods: Improving care transitions to reduce readmissions is amenable to quality improvement (QI) initiatives. A multi-component QI intervention directed at IS patients being discharged to home from a stroke unit at an academic comprehensive stroke center using IS diagnosis-driven home care referrals, improved post-discharge telephone calls, and timely completion of discharge summaries was developed. The improvement project was implemented on July 1, 2019, and evaluated for the 6 months following initiation in comparison to the same 6-month period pre-intervention in 2018. Results: Following implementation, a statistically significant decrease in 30-day all-cause same-hospital readmission rates from 7.4% to 2.8% ( p = .031, d = 1.61) in the project population and from 6.6% to 3% ( p = .010, d = 1.43) in the overall IS population was observed. Improvement was seen in all process measures as well as in patient satisfaction scores. Conclusions: An evidence-based bundled process improvement intervention for IS patients discharged to home was associated with decreased hospital readmission rates following IS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Savannah Cunningham ◽  
Joshua D. Kinsey

Objectives: Pharmacists have been shown to reduce hospital readmission rates and improve adherence rates by providing discharge medication counseling and offering services such as a bedside delivery program.1 Hospitals are now penalized by Medicare if patients are readmitted within 30 days of discharge, so implementation of these programs have the potential to be financially significant as well.2 The primary endpoint of this study is to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist discharge medication counseling bedside delivery program on medication adherence rates within a six-week period following discharge. The secondary endpoint focuses on hospital readmission rates. The objective of this study is to increase collaboration between community pharmacies and hospitals in order to improve the quality of patient care. Methods: This study was designed as intervention versus control, whereas the intervention patients were those who received counseling from a pharmacist or pharmacist intern and control patients were those who did not within the same time period. Collected patient data (n=81) included patients’ demographic data and all disease states, genders, and insurance coverage were encompassed by the included patients. Medication adherence was measured at follow-up intervals utilizing the proportion of days covered (PDC) equation, where a score of at least 80% is required for optimal therapeutic efficacy. Informed consent was obtained from all participants regarding a follow-up telephone call or retrieval of medication records through the pharmacy electronic medication records system and hospital electronic medical records system. Approximately 10-15-minute counseling sessions were performed at the time of discharge. Follow-up phone calls were conducted for the intervention group at four-weeks and six-weeks post-discharge using an eight-item Morisky medication adherence survey to discuss medication adherence and side effects experienced.  Results: There was a total of 81 patients enrolled in this study. There were 27 patients in the intervention group and 54 patients in the control group. These pharmacist-led discharge counseling sessions made a statistically significant difference in medication adherence rates (P=<0.001) as calculated using PDC, showing adherence rates of 84.4% in the intervention group and 62.8% in the control group. The pharmacist-led discharge counseling sessions did not make a statistically significant difference in hospital readmission rates, though investigators do expect to see an impact on clinical and financial endpoints. Conclusion: Pharmacist involvement in a bedside delivery program helps to improve medication adherence in patients being discharged from a hospital. A PDC of at least 80% is required for optimal therapeutic efficacy in most classes of chronic medications, and only the intervention arm reached this threshold.13 Although this study’s sample size was not sufficient to show a statistically significant difference in reduced hospital readmission rates for patients receiving a pharmacist-led discharge counseling session, the findings show the potential for a clinical impact and improved patient outcomes due to increased adherence rates.   Original Research


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 118-119
Author(s):  
F Dang ◽  
P Habashi ◽  
Z Gallinger ◽  
G C Nguyen

Abstract Background Hospital readmission rates are high in the IBD population, with 20% of patients readmitted within the same calendar year. Hospital discharge processes are not routinely standardized and deficiencies in the transition of care after discharge puts patients at increased risk of illness, hospital utilization and healthcare cost. In addition to increased healthcare expenditure, hospitalizations for IBD patients are associated with nosocomial complications such as venous thromboembolism and infection. Aims We hypothesize that implementing standardized follow-up by an IBD practice nurse and electronic health outcome monitoring through NoviSurvey can reduce the risk of hospital readmission compared to current approaches of hospital discharge alone. Methods This parallel randomized control trial is powered for N=400 and will include patients admitted for an IBD flare without requiring surgical intervention from the gastroenterology service or consulted from general internal medicine. Patients randomized to the control arm are discharged with usual standard of care. Patients in the intervention group will be eligible for usual post-discharge care in addition to organized telephone follow-up by an IBD practice nurse at 1, 7 and 30 days post-discharge. In addition, these patients will receive bi-weekly correspondence from NoviSurvey to complete a short questionnaire on clinical disease severity and medication adherence. Based on telephone interaction and survey scores, the IBD nurse may arrange readmission or expedited ambulatory visit for high-risk patients. Results 15 patients are currently enrolled into our study, with 7 randomized to the intervention and 8 to the control group. In the control group, 25% of patients were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge and 13% failed to follow their steroid taper. There were no patients in the intervention group who were readmitted to hospital within 30 days and none who failed their steroid taper. In both the control or intervention group, there were no occurrences of deep vein thrombosis within 30 days post-discharge. Conclusions The preliminary findings in our small sample study indicate that a nurse led post-discharge intervention may translate to benefits including decreased readmission rates to hospital, better patient satisfaction and better medication adherence. Funding Agencies CCC


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-285
Author(s):  
Sarah Fitz ◽  
Lauren Diegel-Vacek ◽  
Erin Mahoney

Background: Lung transplant recipients have high hospital readmission rates. Readmissions are costly to institutions and associated with higher mortality among patients within the first year of transplant. Strong evidence indicates that in hospitalized patients, the use of discharge bundles results in lower 30-day hospital readmission rates. Local Problem: A lung transplant team at a Midwest academic medical center performs 40 to 50 lung transplants annually and provides comprehensive, ongoing care for approximately 300 lung transplant recipients. The objective of this quality improvement project was development and implementation of an evidence-based discharge bundle (standardized patient discharge process) to reduce 30-day hospital readmission rates for this patient population. Methods: A gap analysis was performed using focus groups to identify strategies to reduce readmissions. Using that data, a standardized discharge bundle was developed in collaboration with the transplant team. Interventions: The discharge bundle included improvements in discharge planning, scripted communication methods between team members, a standardized medication template for patient education, standardized follow-up appointment process, and increased telephone calls to the patient after discharge. Results: The primary outcome measured was the monthly 30-day hospital readmission rate of facility lung transplant recipients from June through August of 2019 as compared to the same time period in 2018. The readmission rate did not change during the evaluation period. Team members reported improved communication, efficiency, and improved standardization of follow-up care using the discharge bundle. Conclusions: Implementing a discharge bundle for lung transplant recipients resulted in improved staff satisfaction with the discharge process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document