Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) is one of the common acute and critical illnesses in clinical medicine, and it is another high cause of death after heart disease, cancer and cardiovascular disease. Despite the unremitting research and exploration of many relevant experts in recent
years, major progress has been made in diagnosis and treatment, but the clinical manifestations of acute pulmonary embolism are not specific, and there is a lack of effective and definite methods for diagnosis. The mortality rate of patients with acute pulmonary embolism remains high. Furthermore,
the combination of multiple postoperative diseases caused by general surgery can also increase the mortality of patients. Based on this, this article uses microscope technology to study and analyze the pretreatment methods and nursing methods of patients with acute severe pulmonary embolism
after general surgery to improve the condition of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and increase their recovery rate, hoping to be the domestic acute pulmonary embolism The treatment provides reference and reference. This article first summarizes the relevant theories of surgery and acute
pulmonary embolism, and then uses experimental methods, data analysis methods, survey methods and comparison methods, and SPSS 22.0 statistical analysis software technology to observe the efficacy of patients after thrombolytic therapy through a microscope. It is concluded that in the sample
data of 50 cases, the significant rate accounts for 58%, the effective rate accounts for 36%, and the inefficiency accounts for 6%, confirming the positive impact of early thrombolytic therapy on patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Finally, through the microscope observation and comparison
of the patient’s physical signs before and after nursing, it is concluded that timely and effective nursing after surgery has a great effect on improving the treatment rate of patients.
Should systemic thrombolytic therapy be considered a first-line treatment in acute pulmonary embolism?
