Chronic Cerebellar Stimulation for Cerebral Palsy

Neurosurgery ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Penn

Abstract Chronic cerebellar stimulation for cerebral palsy is a controversial procedure. It is difficult to evaluate objectively because cerebral palsy is not a single disease entity and the clinical syndrome may vary over time. Tests of neurophysiological function, signs of spasticity, and tests of motor function have documented changes, but double-blind evaluations have not. These studies are reviewed, as are the inherent problems in cerebellar stimulation and the physiology of cerebral palsy.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilla Ben-Pazi ◽  
Adi Aran ◽  
Anand Pandyan ◽  
Nava Gelkop ◽  
Gary Ginsberg ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 50 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 451-452
Author(s):  
Ross Davis ◽  
Joseph Schulman ◽  
Mario Nanes ◽  
Ann Delehanty

2001 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
F. M. Bischof

This paper reviews the evidence in the literature for the use of hypebaric oxygen (HBO) in the treatment of cerebral palsy (CP). To date there are only two published studies on the outcome of HBO administration in CP. A pilot study showed significant improvement in gross motor function but provided a low level of evidence. A recent multicentre, double blind, placebo controlled trial reported similar improvements in both HBO and placebo groups, but no difference between the groups. This study had a high level of evidence. The results suggest that participation in the trial produced clinically important gains in function. The outcome of the study implies that HBO may have a placebo effect in CP.


1980 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. Penn ◽  
Barbara M. Myklebust ◽  
Gerald L. Gottlieb ◽  
Gyan C. Agarwal ◽  
Mary E. Etzel

✓ The effects of chronic electrical stimulation of the cerebellum in patients with cerebral palsy have been studied using objective tests of joint compliance, and standardized assessments of developmental reflexes and motor skills. Of 14 patients studied prospectively for 1 to 44 months, 11 showed improvement in motor function. A double-blind test of 10 patients off and on stimulation for an average 8-week period showed no significant changes. Thus, we have no proof that the functional improvements seen with long-term stimulation are the result of cerebellar stimulation.


Neurology ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. H. Gahm ◽  
B. S. Russman ◽  
R. L. Cerciello ◽  
M. R. Fiorentino ◽  
D. M. McGrath

1980 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 648-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Keith Whittaker

✓ Eight children with cerebral palsy, who had implanted cerebellar stimulators, were evaluated by a panel of six experienced physicians in a double-blind cross-over experiment with 3-week periods of real and sham stimulation. Neither the panel of physicians nor the patients could tell whether the stimulators were operating or not.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document