Burning Hands Syndrome Revisited

Neurosurgery ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1038-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Wilberger ◽  
Adnan Abla ◽  
Joseph C. Maroon

Abstract The burning hands syndrome of spinal cord injury was first described in 1977. The syndrome is characterized by burning dysesthesias and paresthesias in the hands and may be associated with either cervical fracture/dislocation or no detectable cervical spine abnormalities. A case of burning hands syndrome without cervical spine injury is presented in which somatosensory evoked potentials and magnetic resonance imaging were used to delineate the pathophysiology of this syndrome.

Author(s):  
Hideo Iida ◽  
Shigekuni Tachibana ◽  
Takao Kitahara ◽  
Shigeharu Horiike ◽  
Takashi Ohwada ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Sara Saleh ◽  
Kyle I. Swanson ◽  
Taryn Bragg

Cervical spine injuries are the most common spine injuries in the pediatric population. The authors present the youngest known patient who underwent cervical spine fusion to repair birth trauma–induced cervical fracture dislocation, resulting in spondyloptosis and spinal cord injury. A 2-week-old boy was found to have spondyloptosis and spinal cord injury after concerns arose from reduced movement of the extremities. The patient’s birth was complicated by undiagnosed abdominal dystocia, which led to cervical distraction injury. At 15 days of age, the boy underwent successful C-5 corpectomy, with anterior C4–6 and posterior C2–7 arthrodesis, using an autologous rib graft for a C-5 fracture dislocation. MRI performed 2 weeks postoperatively revealed significant improvement in the alignment of the spinal canal. The patient was discharged from the hospital in a custom Minerva brace and underwent close follow-up in addition to occupational therapy and physical therapy. At the latest follow-up 4.5 years later, the patient was able to walk and ride a tricycle by himself. The authors describe the patient’s surgery and the challenges faced in achieving successful repair and cervical spine stabilization in such a young patient. The authors suggest that significant neurological recovery after spinal cord injury in infants is possible with appropriate, timely, and interdisciplinary management.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gede Andry Nicolas ◽  
Heru Sutanto Koerniawan ◽  
Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa

The incident of cervical spine injury and cervical spinal cord injury is between 2.0% to 5.0%. The advanced trauma life support (ATLS) stated that a patient with multiple traumas should be assumed tohave cervical spine injury especially if the patient loses consciousness when present in the ER. It is stressed that cervical spine injury requires continuous immobilization of the patient’s entire body using a semirigid collar as well as a backboard with tape and straps before and during transfer to a defnitive care facility. The understanding of the mechanism of injury is the most important as the forces transferred are signifcantly different causing different injuries. A serial case reported by Walter and Adkins found that there was no signifcant difference between the patients that have a bullet removed from the neck and patients that have a bullet left in the cervical cord. In both cases, there was no improvement to the neurologic outcome. Kupcha recommends doing selective wound management and observation of retained intracanal bullet fragments in a patient with complete lesion. Surgical decompression after the injury is not recommended. We report a case of 14 year old boy who was treated at Sanglah Hospital referred froman out-of-island Type C Hospital with a spinal cord injury - American Spinal Injury Association A (SCI ASIA A) caused by a gunshot wound in the cervical. Surgical decompression and bullet removal was performedas well as fusion stabilization. He is then treated in the intensive care unit for 48 hours with a slight improvement in motoric of upper and lower extremities.


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s34-s34
Author(s):  
A. T. D. Agarwal

BackgroundIt is believed that dopamine resistance sets in within 72–92 hours following therapy. However, in the authors' experience, spinal cord injury patients may require dopamine to maintain blood pressure over several weeks.ObjectivesThis study aims to: (1) assess the incidence and duration of of dopamine dependence in cervical cord injury patients; and (2) find the relation (if any) of dopamine dependent hypotension with outcome of spinal cord injured patients.MethodsThis was a prospective, observational study carried out over 2-month period in the neurosurgery intensive care unit (ICU) at JPN Apex Trauma Centre, AIIMS. All cervical spine injury patients who had hypotension during the hospital stay were included in the study. History, clinical findings, requirement of ionotropic support, management, and outcome were recorded for all enrolled subjects.ResultsDuring the study period 48 patients were admitted with cervical spine injury in the ICU. Of these, 26 patients (54%) had hypotension and were constituted the study group. Eleven patients had complete spinal cord injury (power 0/5) and 15 patients had incomplete spinal cord injury. Twenty-four patients were on ventilator support and two were on oxygen masks. The mean dose of dopamine which the patient receives during the treatment was 7.5 mcg/kg/min with the maximum and minimum doses of 20mcg/kg/min and 2 mcg/kg/min. The mean duration of dopamine support was 17 days (Range 6–48 days). Eight patients (31%) required intermittent dopamine support and 18 patients (70%) required continuous support. The in-hospital mortality was 61% (n = 16). Mortality was significantly lower in patients who received intermittent ionotropic support as compared to those who required continuous ionotropic support (p < 0.01).ConclusionThe patients with spinal cord injury are dependent on dopamine throughout their recovery period. The patients who required intermittent ionotropic support had significant better outcome compared to those who required continuous ionotropic support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document