The L5 epitope: an early marker for neural induction in the chick embryo and its involvement in inductive interactions

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 959-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Roberts ◽  
N. Platt ◽  
A. Streit ◽  
M. Schachner ◽  
C.D. Stern
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Hybridoma Cells ◽  
Minor Components ◽  
Lower Molecular Mass ◽  
Host Embryo ◽  
Donor Embryo ◽  
Developing Nervous System

The pattern of expression of the carbohydrate epitope L5 was studied during early development of the chick neuroepithelium. Immunoreactivity first appears during gastrulation, at mid-primitive streak stage, and persists until at least 3.5 days of development. The epitope is expressed on all the components of the developing nervous system, both central and peripheral. In immunoblots, the antibody recognises a major component of about Mr 500,000 and several more minor components of lower molecular mass. If a Hensen's node from a donor embryo is transplanted into the area opaca of a host embryo, L5 immunoreactivity appears in the epiblast surrounding the graft. If hybridoma cells secreting the antibody are grafted together with Hensen's node into a host chick embryo, the induction of a supernumerary nervous system is inhibited. We suggest that the L5 epitope is an early and general marker for neural induction and that it may be involved directly in inductive interactions.

Neural induction and regionalisation in the chick embryo

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-741 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.G. Storey ◽  
J.M. Crossley ◽  
E.M. De Robertis ◽  
W.E. Norris ◽  
C.D. Stern
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Molecular Markers ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Normal Development ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Embryo Chick ◽  
Host Embryo ◽  
Embryonic Region

Induction and regionalisation of the chick nervous system were investigated by transplanting Hensen's node into the extra-embryonic region (area opaca margin) of a host embryo. Chick/quail chimaeras were used to determine the contributions of host and donor tissue to the supernumerary axis, and three molecular markers, Engrailed, neurofilaments (antibody 3A10) and XlHbox1/Hox3.3 were used to aid the identification of particular regions of the ectopic axis. We find that the age of the node determines the regions of the nervous system that form: young nodes (stages 2–4) induced both anterior and posterior nervous system, while older nodes (stages 5–6) have reduced inducing ability and generate only posterior nervous system. By varying the age of the host embryo, we show that the competence of the epiblast to respond to neural induction declines after stage 4. We conclude that during normal development, the initial steps of neural induction take place before stage 4 and that anteroposterior regionalisation of the nervous system may be a later process, perhaps associated with the differentiating notochord. We also speculate that the mechanisms responsible for induction of head CNS differ from those that generate the spinal cord: the trunk CNS could arise by homeogenetic induction by anterior CNS or by elongation of neural primordia that are induced very early.

Spatial aspects of neural induction in Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.A. Jones ◽  
H.R. Woodland
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Peripheral Nerves ◽  
Neural Differentiation ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Neural Tissue ◽  
Thoracic Region ◽  
Lateral Extent ◽  
Tail Tip ◽  
Developing Nervous System

A monoclonal antibody, 2G9, has been identified and characterised as a marker of neural differentiation in Xenopus. The epitope is present throughout the adult central nervous system and in peripheral nerves. Staining is first detected in embryos at stage 21 in the thoracic region. By stage 29 it stains the whole central nervous system, except the tail tip. The epitope is present in a 65K Mr protein, and includes sialic acid. The antibody also reacts with neural tissue in mice and axolotls and newts. 2G9 was used to show that both notochord and somites are capable of neural induction, and the stimulus is present as late as stage 22. Attempts to demonstrate the induction of nervous system by developing nervous system (homoiogenetic induction) were unsuccessful. The view that the lateral extent of the nervous system might be determined by that of the inductive stimulus is discussed. Neural induction was detected as early as stage 10 and occurs in embryos without gastrulation and without cell division from stage 7 1/2.

Early posterior neural tissue is induced by FGF in the chick embryo

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.G. Storey ◽  
A. Goriely ◽  
C.M. Sargent ◽  
J.M. Brown ◽  
H.D. Burns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Neural Induction ◽  
Neural Tissue ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Specific Aspect ◽  
Amphibian Embryo ◽  
Fgf Signalling ◽  
Unique Cell ◽  
Neural Cell Fate

Signals that induce neural cell fate in amniote embryos emanate from a unique cell population found at the anterior end of the primitive streak. Cells in this region express a number of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), a group of secreted proteins implicated in the induction and patterning of neural tissue in the amphibian embryo. Here we exploit the large size and accessibility of the early chick embryo to analyse the function of FGF signalling specifically during neural induction. Our results demonstrate that extraembryonic epiblast cells previously shown to be responsive to endogenous neural-inducing signals express early posterior neural genes in response to local, physiological levels of FGF signal. This neural tissue does not express anterior neural markers or undergo neuronal differentiation and forms in the absence of axial mesoderm. Prospective mesodermal tissue is, however, induced and we present evidence for both the direct and indirect action of FGFs on prospective posterior neural tissue. These findings suggest that FGF signalling underlies a specific aspect of neural induction, the initiation of the programme that leads to the generation of the posterior central nervous system.

The role of retinoid-binding proteins in the generation of pattern in the developing limb, the regenerating limb and the nervous system

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 109-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Maden ◽  
D. E. Ong ◽  
D. Summerbell ◽  
F. Chytil
Keyword(s):  
Nervous System ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Floor Plate ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Commissural Axons ◽  
New Information ◽  
Mantle Layer ◽  
Developing Nervous System

We summarise existing data and describe new information on the levels and distribution of cellular retinoic acid-binding protein (CRABP) and cellular retinolbinding protein (CRBP) in the regenerating axolotl limb, the developing chick limb bud and the nervous system of the chick embryo in the light of the known morphogenetic effects of retinoids on these systems. In the regenerating limb, levels of CRABP rise 3- to 4-fold during regeneration, peaking at the time when retinoic acid (RA) is most effective at causing pattern duplications. The levels of CRBP are low. The potency of various retinoids in causing pattern respecification correlates well with the ability of these compounds to bind to CRABP. In the chick limb bud, the levels of CRABP are high and the levels of CRBP are low. Again the binding of various retinoids to CRABP correlates well with their ability to cause pattern duplications. By immunocytochemistry, we show that CRABP is present at high levels in the progress zone of the limb bud and is distributed across the anteroposterior axis in a gradient with the high point at the anterior margin. In the chick embryo, CRABP levels are high and CRBP levels are low. By immunocytochemistry, CRABP is localised primarily to the developing nervous system, labelling cells and axons in the mantle layer of the neural tube. These become the neurons of the commissural system. Also sensory axons label intensely with CRABP whereas motor axons do not and in the mixed nerves at the brachial plexus sensory and motor components can be distinguished on this basis. In the neural tube, CRBP only stains the ventral floor plate. Since the ventral floor plate may be a source of chemoattractant for commissural axons, we suggest on the basis of these staining patterns that RA may fulfill this role and thus be involved morphogenetically in the developing nervous system.

scholarly journals Brachial muscles in the chick embryo: the fate of individual somites

Development ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-116
Author(s):  
Bonnie Beresford
Keyword(s):  
Chick Embryo ◽  
In Ovo ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Embryonic Origin ◽  
Wing Bud ◽  
Host Embryo ◽  
Donor Embryo

The wing and wing-associated muscles of the shoulder and thorax in the bird all cleavefrom common myogenic masses in the developing wing bud and are referred to collectively as brachial muscles. In this study the precise embryonic origin of the brachial muscles was determined using chick-quail chimaeras. Such chimaeras consisted of a graft of one somite taken from a 2-day quail donor embryo transplanted to the equivalent location in a 2-day chick host embryo. The chimaeras were analysed at 9·5–10·0 days in ovo to determine the location of the grafted cells and therefore the structures that were derived from the transplanted somite. The somites that were studied in this manner were somites 13 to 23 inclusive. The results show that only somites 16 to 21 inclusive contribute cells to the brachial musculature; moreover, the cells from a given somite are not distributed randomly among the brachial muscles but populate specific muscles only: thus it has been possible to map the somitic origin of individual brachial muscles. Moreover, there is an indication that each somite plays a unique role in the development of the brachial muscles.

Anti-apoptotic role of Sonic hedgehog protein at the early stages of nervous system organogenesis

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (20) ◽  
pp. 4011-4020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Charrier ◽  
Françoise Lapointe ◽  
Nicole M. Le Douarin ◽  
Marie-Aimée Teillet
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Chick Embryo ◽  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Primitive Streak ◽  
Embryo Cell ◽  
Floor Plate ◽  
Cell Death Program ◽  
Midline Cells

In vertebrates the neural tube, like most of the embryonic organs, shows discreet areas of programmed cell death at several stages during development. In the chick embryo, cell death is dramatically increased in the developing nervous system and other tissues when the midline cells, notochord and floor plate, are prevented from forming by excision of the axial-paraxial hinge (APH), i.e. caudal Hensen’s node and rostral primitive streak, at the 6-somite stage (Charrier, J. B., Teillet, M.-A., Lapointe, F. and Le Douarin, N. M. (1999). Development126, 4771-4783). In this paper we demonstrate that one day after APH excision, when dramatic apoptosis is already present in the neural tube, the latter can be rescued from death by grafting a notochord or a floor plate fragment in its vicinity. The neural tube can also be recovered by transplanting it into a stage-matched chick embryo having one of these structures. In addition, cells engineered to produce Sonic hedgehog protein (SHH) can mimic the effect of the notochord and floor plate cells in in situ grafts and transplantation experiments. SHH can thus counteract a built-in cell death program and thereby contribute to organ morphogenesis, in particular in the central nervous system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document