scholarly journals A distinct developmental programme for the cranial paraxial mesoderm in the chick embryo

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (17) ◽  
pp. 3461-3472 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Hacker ◽  
S. Guthrie
Keyword(s):  
Neural Tube ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Developmental Pathways ◽  
Myogenic Cells ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Developmental Programme ◽  
Myogenic Markers ◽  
Somitic Mesoderm ◽  
Late Stages

Cells of the cranial paraxial mesoderm give rise to parts of the skull and muscles of the head. Some mesoderm cells migrate from locations close to the hindbrain into the branchial arches where they undergo muscle differentiation. We have characterised these migratory pathways in chick embryos either by DiI-labelling cells before migration or by grafting quail cranial paraxial mesoderm orthotopically. These experiments demonstrate that depending on their initial rostrocaudal position, cranial paraxial mesoderm cells migrate to fill the core of specific branchial arches. A survey of the expression of myogenic genes showed that the myogenic markers Myf5, MyoD and myogenin were expressed in branchial arch muscle, but at comparatively late stages compared with their expression in the somites. Pax3 was not expressed by myogenic cells that migrate into the branchial arches despite its expression in migrating precursors of limb muscles. In order to test whether segmental plate or somitic mesoderm has the ability to migrate in a cranial location, we grafted quail trunk mesoderm into the cranial paraxial mesoderm region. While segmental plate mesoderm cells did not migrate into the branchial arches, somitic cells were capable of migrating and were incorporated into the branchial arch muscle mass. Grafted somitic cells in the vicinity of the neural tube maintained expression of the somitic markers Pax3, MyoD and Pax1. By contrast, ectopic somitic cells located distal to the neural tube and in the branchial arches did not express Pax3. These data imply that signals in the vicinity of the hindbrain and branchial arches act on migrating myogenic cells to influence their gene expression and developmental pathways.

Embryology of the head and neck

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin E. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neck Region ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Aquatic Vertebrates ◽  
History Of ◽  
Further Development

Embryology and development have been covered after the main anatomical descriptions in the previous sections, but it is going to precede them in this section. The reason for this departure is that the embryonic development of the head and neck explains much of the mature anatomy which can seem illogical without its developmental history. The development of the head, face, and neck is an area of embryology where significant strides in our understanding have been made in the last few years. The development of the head is intimately related to the development of the brain outlined in Chapter 19 and its effects on shaping the head will be described in Chapters 32 and 33. The major thrust of this chapter is the description of the formation of structures called the pharyngeal (or branchial) arches and the fate of the tissues that contribute to them. All four embryonic germ layers contribute to the pharyngeal arches and their derivatives, hence to further development of the head and neck. Figure 21.1 is a cross section through the neck region of a 3-week old embryo after neurulation and folding described in Chapter 8. It shows the structures and tissues that contribute to the formation of the head and neck: • The neural tube situated posteriorly and the ectomesenchymal neural crest cells that arise as the tube closes; • The paraxial mesoderm anterolateral to the neural tube; • The endodermal foregut tube anteriorly; • The investing layer of ectoderm. The development of all these tissues is intimately interrelated. The pharyngeal arches are very ancient structures in the evolutionary history of vertebrates. The arches and their individual components have undergone many modifications during their long history. In ancestral aquatic vertebrates, as in modern fishes, water was drawn in through the mouth and expelled through a series of gill slits (or branchiae, hence the term ‘branchial arch’) in the sides of the pharynx. Oxygen was extracted as the water was passed over a gill apparatus supported by a branchial arch skeleton moved by branchial muscles controlled by branchial nerves. Although ventilation and respiration is now a function of the lungs in land vertebrates, the pharyngeal arches persist during vertebrate development.

Pax3 functions in cell survival and in pax7 regulation

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (8) ◽  
pp. 1665-1674 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.G. Borycki ◽  
J. Li ◽  
F. Jin ◽  
C.P. Emerson ◽  
J.A. Epstein
Keyword(s):  
Cell Survival ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Muscle Development ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Presomitic Mesoderm ◽  
Surface Ectoderm ◽  
Dorsal Neural Tube ◽  
Vertebrate Embryos ◽  
Somitic Mesoderm

In developing vertebrate embryos, Pax3 is expressed in the neural tube and in the paraxial mesoderm that gives rise to skeletal muscles. Pax3 mutants develop muscular and neural tube defects; furthermore, Pax3 is essential for the proper activation of the myogenic determination factor gene, MyoD, during early muscle development and PAX3 chromosomal translocations result in muscle tumors, providing evidence that Pax3 has diverse functions in myogenesis. To investigate the specific functions of Pax3 in development, we have examined cell survival and gene expression in presomitic mesoderm, somites and neural tube of developing wild-type and Pax3 mutant (Splotch) mouse embryos. Disruption of Pax3 expression by antisense oligonucleotides significantly impairs MyoD activation by signals from neural tube/notochord and surface ectoderm in cultured presomitic mesoderm (PSM), and is accompanied by a marked increase in programmed cell death. In Pax3 mutant (Splotch) embryos, MyoD is activated normally in the hypaxial somite, but MyoD-expressing cells are disorganized and apoptosis is prevalent in newly formed somites, but not in the neural tube or mature somites. In neural tube and somite regions where cell survival is maintained, the closely related Pax7 gene is upregulated, and its expression becomes expanded into the dorsal neural tube and somites, where Pax3 would normally be expressed. These results establish that Pax3 has complementary functions in MyoD activation and inhibition of apoptosis in the somitic mesoderm and in repression of Pax7 during neural tube and somite development.

Activation of different myogenic pathways: myf-5 is induced by the neural tube and MyoD by the dorsal ectoderm in mouse paraxial mesoderm

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Cossu ◽  
R. Kelly ◽  
S. Tajbakhsh ◽  
S. Di Donna ◽  
E. Vivarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Tube ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Immunocytochemical Staining ◽  
Myogenic Cells ◽  
Adjacent Structures ◽  
Dorsal Ectoderm ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Beta Galactosidase ◽  
Dependent Pathway

Newly formed somites or unsegmented paraxial mesoderm (UPM) have been cultured either in isolation or with adjacent structures to investigate the influence of these tissues on myogenic differentiation in mammals. The extent of differentiation was easily and accurately quantified by counting the number of beta-galactosidase-positive cells, since mesodermal tissues had been isolated from transgenic mice that carry the n-lacZ gene under the transcriptional control of a myosin light chain promoter, restricting expression to striated muscle. The results obtained showed that axial structures are necessary to promote differentiation of paraxial mesoderm, in agreement with previous observations. However, it also appeared that the influence of axial structures could be replaced by dorsolateral tissues, adjacent to the paraxial mesoderm. To elucidate which of these tissues exerts this positive effect, we cultured the paraxial mesoderm with a variety of adjacent structures, either adherent to the mesoderm or recombined in vitro. The results of these experiments indicated that the dorsal ectoderm exerts a positive influence on myogenesis but only if left in physical proximity to it. In contrast, lateral mesoderm delays the positive effect of the ectoderm (and has no effect on its own) suggesting that this tissue produces an inhibitory signal. To investigate whether axial structures and dorsal ectoderm induce myogenesis through common or separate pathways, we dissected the medial half of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm and cultured it with the adjacent neural tube. We also cultured the lateral half of the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm with adjacent ectoderm. The induction of the myogenic regulatory factors myf-5 and MyoD was monitored by double staining of cultured cells with antibodies against MyoD and beta-galactosidase since the tissues were isolated from mouse embryos that carry n-lacZ targeted to the myf-5 gene, so that myf-5 expressing cells could be easily identified by either histochemical or immunocytochemical staining for beta-galactosidase. After 1 day in culture myogenic cells from the medial half expressed myf-5 but not MyoD, while myogenic cells from the lateral half expressed MyoD but not myf-5. By the next day in vitro, however, most myogenic cells expressed both gene products. These data suggest that the neural tube activates myogenesis in the medial half of paraxial mesoderm through a myf-5-dependent pathway, while the dorsal ectoderm activates myogenesis through a MyoD-dependent pathway. The possible developmental significance of these observations is discussed and a model of myogenic determination in mammals is proposed.

scholarly journals Rhombomere rotation reveals that multiple mechanisms contribute to the segmental pattern of hindbrain neural crest migration

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (7) ◽  
pp. 1777-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sechrist ◽  
T. Scherson ◽  
M. Bronner-Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Otic Vesicle ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Migratory Pattern ◽  
Neural Crest Migration ◽  
Surgical Manipulation ◽  
Otic Vesicles

Hindbrain neural crest cells adjacent to rhombomeres 2 (r2), r4 and r6 migrate in a segmental pattern, toward the first, second and third branchial arches, respectively. Although all rhombomeres generate neural crest cells, those arising from r3 and r5 deviate rostrally and caudally (J. Sechrist, G. Serbedzija, T. Scherson, S. Fraser and M. Bronner-Fraser (1993) Development 118, 691–703). We have altered the rostrocaudal positions of the cranial neural tube, adjacent ectoderm/mesoderm or presumptive otic vesicle to examine tissue influences on this segmental migratory pattern. After neural tube rotation, labeled neural crest cells follow pathways generally appropriate for their new position after grafting. For example, when r3 and r4 were transposed, labeled r3 cells migrated laterally to the second branchial arch whereas labeled r4 cells primarily deviated caudally toward the second arch, with some cells moving rostrally toward the first. In contrast to r4 neural crest cells, transposed r3 cells leave the neural tube surface in a polarized manner, near the r3/4 border. Surprisingly, some labeled neural crest cells moved directionally toward small ectopic otic vesicles that often formed in the ectoderm adjacent to grafted r4. Similarly, they moved toward grafted or displaced otic vesicles. In contrast, surgical manipulation of the mesoderm adjacent to r3 and r4 had no apparent effects. Our results offer evidence that neural crest cells migrate directionally toward the otic vesicle, either by selective attraction or pathway-derived cues.

MyoD and Myf-5 define the specification of musculature of distinct embryonic origin

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Kablar ◽  
Atsushi Asakura ◽  
Kirsten Krastel ◽  
Chuyan Ying ◽  
Linda L May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Wall ◽  
Expression Pattern ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Unique Role ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Embryonic Origin ◽  
Body Wall Muscles ◽  
Myogenic Precursor

Mounting evidence supports the notion that Myf-5 and MyoD play unique roles in the development of epaxial (originating in the dorso-medial half of the somite, e.g. back muscles) and hypaxial (originating in the ventro-lateral half of the somite, e.g. limb and body wall muscles) musculature. To further understand how Myf-5 and MyoD genes co-operate during skeletal muscle specification, we examined and compared the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ (258/-2.5lacZ and MD6.0-lacZ) transgenes in wild-type, Myf-5, and MyoD mutant embryos. We found that the delayed onset of muscle differentiation in the branchial arches, tongue, limbs, and diaphragm of MyoD-/- embryos was a consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to progress through their normal developmental program and not because of a defect in migration of muscle progenitor cells into these regions. We also found that myogenic precursor cells for back, intercostal, and abdominal wall musculature in Myf-5-/-embryos failed to undergo normal translocation or differentiation. By contrast, the myogenic precursors of intercostal and abdominal wall musculature in MyoD-/- embryos underwent normal translocation but failed to undergo timely differentiation. In conclusion, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that Myf-5 plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising after translocation of epithelial dermamyotome cells along the medial edge of the somite to the subjacent myotome (e.g., back or epaxial muscle) and that MyoD plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising from migratory precursor cells (e.g., limb and branchial arch muscles, tongue, and diaphragm). In addition, the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ transgenes in the intercostal and abdominal wall muscles of Myf-5-/- and MyoD-/- embryos suggests that appropriate development of these muscles is dependent on both genes and, therefore, these muscles have a dual embryonic origin (epaxial and hypaxial).Key words: epaxial and hypaxial muscle, Myf-5, MyoD, mouse development, somite.

Jaw and branchial arch mutants in zebrafish I: branchial arches

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 329-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
T. Piotrowski ◽  
H. Grandel ◽  
M. Brand ◽  
C.P. Heisenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Zebrafish Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Pigment Cells ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Pectoral Fins ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Group Members ◽  
The Brain

Jaws and branchial arches together are a basic, segmented feature of the vertebrate head. Seven arches develop in the zebrafish embryo (Danio rerio), derived largely from neural crest cells that form the cartilaginous skeleton. In this and the following paper we describe the phenotypes of 109 arch mutants, focusing here on three classes that affect the posterior pharyngeal arches, including the hyoid and five gill-bearing arches. In lockjaw, the hyoid arch is strongly reduced and subsets of branchial arches do not develop. Mutants of a large second class, designated the flathead group, lack several adjacent branchial arches and their associated cartilages. Five alleles at the flathead locus all lead to larvae that lack arches 4–6. Among 34 other flathead group members complementation tests are incomplete, but at least six unique phenotypes can be distinguished. These all delete continuous stretches of adjacent branchial arches and unpaired cartilages in the ventral midline. Many show cell death in the midbrain, from which some neural crest precursors of the arches originate. lockjaw and a few mutants in the flathead group, including pistachio, affect both jaw cartilage and pigmentation, reflecting essential functions of these genes in at least two neural crest lineages. Mutants of a third class, including boxer, dackel and pincher, affect pectoral fins and axonal trajectories in the brain, as well as the arches. Their skeletal phenotypes suggest that they disrupt cartilage morphogenesis in all arches. Our results suggest that there are sets of genes that: (1) specify neural crest cells in groups of adjacent head segments, and (2) function in common genetic pathways in a variety of tissues including the brain, pectoral fins and pigment cells as well as pharyngeal arches.

The branchial arches and HGF are growth-promoting and chemoattractant for cranial motor axons

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (8) ◽  
pp. 1751-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Caton ◽  
A. Hacker ◽  
A. Naeem ◽  
J. Livet ◽  
F. Maina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factor ◽  
Hepatocyte Growth Factor ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Branchial Arch ◽  
Sensory Ganglia ◽  
Motor Axons ◽  
Collagen Gels ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Growth Promoting ◽  
Hepatocyte Growth

During development, cranial motor neurons extend their axons along distinct pathways into the periphery. For example, branchiomotor axons extend dorsally to leave the hindbrain via large dorsal exit points. They then grow in association with sensory ganglia, to their targets, the muscles of the branchial arches. We have investigated the possibility that pathway tissues might secrete diffusible chemorepellents or chemoattractants that guide cranial motor axons, using co-cultures in collagen gels. We found that explants of dorsal neural tube or hindbrain roof plate chemorepelled cranial motor axons, while explants of cranial sensory ganglia were weakly chemoattractive. Explants of branchial arch mesenchyme were strongly growth-promoting and chemoattractive for cranial motor axons. Enhanced and oriented axon outgrowth was also elicited by beads loaded with Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF); antibodies to this protein largely blocked the outgrowth and orientation effects of the branchial arch on motor axons. HGF was expressed in the branchial arches, whilst Met, which encodes an HGF receptor, was expressed by subpopulations of cranial motor neurons. Mice with targetted disruptions of HGF or Met showed defects in the navigation of hypoglossal motor axons into the branchial region. Branchial arch tissue may thus act as a target-derived factor that guides motor axons during development. This influence is likely to be mediated partly by Hepatocyte Growth Factor, although a component of branchial arch-mediated growth promotion and chemoattraction was not blocked by anti-HGF antibodies.

Myogenesis in paraxial mesoderm: preferential induction by dorsal neural tube and by cells expressing Wnt-1

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (11) ◽  
pp. 3675-3686 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.M. Stern ◽  
A.M. Brown ◽  
S.D. Hauschka
Keyword(s):  
Neural Tube ◽  
Muscle Development ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Myogenic Response ◽  
Dorsal Neural Tube ◽  
Ventral Neural Tube ◽  
Myogenic Induction ◽  
Inductive Activity

Previous studies have demonstrated that the neural tube/notochord complex is required for skeletal muscle development within somites. In order to explore the localization of myogenic inducing signals within the neural tube, dorsal or ventral neural tube halves were cultured in contact with single somites or pieces of segmental plate mesoderm. Somites and segmental plates cultured with the dorsal half of the neural tube exhibited 70% and 85% myogenic response rates, as determined by immunostaining for myosin heavy chain. This response was slightly lower than the 100% response to whole neural tube/notochord, but was much greater than the 30% and 10% myogenic response to ventral neural tube with and without notochord. These results demonstrate that the dorsal neural tube emits a potent myogenic inducing signal which accounts for most of the inductive activity of whole neural tube/notochord. However, a role for ventral neural tube/notochord in somite myogenic induction was clearly evident from the larger number of myogenic cells induced when both dorsal neural tube and ventral neural tube/notochord were present. To address the role of a specific dorsal neural tube factor in somite myogenic induction, we tested the ability of Wnt-1-expressing fibroblasts to promote paraxial mesoderm myogenesis in vitro. We found that cells expressing Wnt-1 induced a small number of somite and segmental plate cells to undergo myogenesis. This finding is consistent with the localized dorsal neural tube inductive activity described above, but since the ventral neural tube/notochord also possesses myogenic inductive capacity yet does not express Wnt-1, additional inductive factors are likely involved.

Cell-autonomous shift from axial to paraxial mesodermal development in zebrafish floating head mutants

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (12) ◽  
pp. 4257-4264 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.E. Halpern ◽  
C. Thisse ◽  
R.K. Ho ◽  
B. Thisse ◽  
B. Riggleman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neural Tube ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Floor Plate ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Genetic Mosaics ◽  
Essential Step ◽  
Ventral Neural Tube ◽  
Mesodermal Development

Zebrafish floating head mutant embryos lack notochord and develop somitic muscle in its place. This may result from incorrect specification of the notochord domain at gastrulation, or from respecification of notochord progenitors to form muscle. In genetic mosaics, floating head acts cell autonomously. Transplanted wild-type cells differentiate into notochord in mutant hosts; however, cells from floating head mutant donors produce muscle rather than notochord in wild-type hosts. Consistent with respecification, markers of axial mesoderm are initially expressed in floating head mutant gastrulas, but expression does not persist. Axial cells also inappropriately express markers of paraxial mesoderm. Thus, single cells in the mutant midline transiently co-express genes that are normally specific to either axial or paraxial mesoderm. Since floating head mutants produce some floor plate in the ventral neural tube, midline mesoderm may also retain early signaling capabilities. Our results suggest that wild-type floating head provides an essential step in maintaining, rather than initiating, development of notochord-forming axial mesoderm.

Pax3 is required for cardiac neural crest migration in the mouse: evidence from the splotch (Sp2H) mutant

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Conway ◽  
D.J. Henderson ◽  
A.J. Copp
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Cardiac Neural Crest ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Aortic Arches ◽  
Cardiac Outflow

Neural crest cells originating in the occipital region of the avian embryo are known to play a vital role in formation of the septum of the cardiac outflow tract and to contribute cells to the aortic arches, thymus, thyroid and parathyroids. This ‘cardiac’ neural crest sub-population is assumed to exist in mammals, but without direct evidence. In this paper we demonstrate, using RT-PCR and in situ hybridisation, that Pax3 expression can serve as a marker of cardiac neural crest cells in the mouse embryo. Cells of this lineage were traced from the occipital neural tube, via branchial arches 3, 4 and 6, into the aortic sac and aorto-pulmonary outflow tract. Confirmation that these Pax3-positive cells are indeed cardiac neural crest is provided by experiments in which hearts were deprived of a source of colonising neural crest, by organ culture in vitro, with consequent lack of up-regulation of Pax3. Occipital neural crest cell outgrowths in vitro were also shown to express Pax3. Mutation of Pax3, as occurs in the splotch (Sp2H) mouse, results in development of conotruncal heart defects including persistent truncus arteriosus. Homozygotes also exhibit defects of the aortic arches, thymus, thyroid and parathyroids. Pax3-positive neural crest cells were found to emigrate from the occipital neural tube of Sp2H/Sp2H embryos in a relatively normal fashion, but there was a marked deficiency or absence of neural crest cells traversing branchial arches 3, 4 and 6, and entering the cardiac outflow tract. This decreased expression of Pax3 in Sp2H/Sp2H embryos was not due to down-regulation of Pax3 in neural crest cells, as use of independent neural crest markers, Hoxa-3, CrabpI, Prx1, Prx2 and c-met also revealed a deficiency of migrating cardiac neural crest cells in homozygous embryos. This work demonstrates the essential role of the cardiac neural crest in formation of the heart and great vessels in the mouse and, furthermore, shows that Pax3 function is required for the cardiac neural crest to complete its migration to the developing heart.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document