ASO Visual Abstract: Treatment Strategies and Prognosis in Patients with Synchronous or Metachronous Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Population-Based Study

Author(s):  
C. Bakkers ◽  
R. J. Lurvink ◽  
A. Rijken ◽  
S. W. Nienhuijs ◽  
N. F. Kok ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
C. Bakkers ◽  
R. J. Lurvink ◽  
A. Rijken ◽  
S. W. Nienhuijs ◽  
N. F. Kok ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare treatment strategies and survival of patients with synchronous colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) and patients with metachronous CPM in a nationwide cohort. Methods All patients from the Netherlands Cancer Registry with synchronous or metachronous CPM whose primary colorectal cancer (CRC) was diagnosed between 1 January and 30 June 2015 were included in the study. Treatments were categorized as (A) cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy [CRS-HIPEC]; (B) palliative treatment; or (C) best supportive care. Overall survival (OS) for all the patients and disease-free survival (DFS) for those who underwent CRS-HIPEC were compared between the two groups. Results Of 7233 patients, 743 had a diagnosis of CPM, including 409 patients with synchronous CPM and 334 patients with metachronous CPM. The median OS was 8.1 months for the patients with synchronous CPM versus 12 months for the patients with metachronous CPM (p = 0.003). After multivariable correction, OS no longer differed between the patients with synchronous CPM and those with metachronous CPM (HR 1.03 [0.83–1.27]). The patients with metachronous CPM more often underwent CRS-HIPEC than the patients with synchronous CPM (16 % vs 8 %; p = 0.001). The two groups did not differ statistically in terms of DFS and OS (median DFS, 21.5 vs 14.1 months, respectively; p = 0.094; median OS, 37.8 vs. 35.8 months, respectively; p = 0.553). Conclusion This population-based study showed that survival for the patients with synchronous CPM and patients with metachronous CPM did not significantly differ. This suggests that a similar prognosis may be expected for patients selected for treatment regardless of the onset of CPM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (11) ◽  
pp. 1811-1817 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Flanagan ◽  
J. Solon ◽  
K.H. Chang ◽  
S. Deady ◽  
B. Moran ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (26) ◽  
pp. 2430-2438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Smedberg ◽  
Johnny Steuer ◽  
Karin Leander ◽  
Rebecka Hultgren

Abstract Aims As large population-based studies of aortic dissection are lacking, the incidence numbers and knowledge about time-trends and sex differences are uncertain. The objective was to describe incidence, temporal trends and outcome of aortic dissection with particular emphasis on sex differences. Methods and results During the study period 2002–2016, 8057 patients in Sweden were diagnosed with aortic dissection, identified from the National Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register. A total of 5757 (71%) patients were hospitalized, whereas 2300 (29%) patients were deceased without concurrent hospital stay. The annual incidence was 7.2 per 100 000 (9.1 in men and 5.4 in women), decreasing over time in men (P = 0.005). Mean age in the hospitalized patients was 68 years (SD 13), 2080 (36%) were women. Within the first 14 days after onset, 1807 patients (32%) underwent surgical repair. The proportion of surgically treated increased from the 5-year period 2002–2006 to 2012–2016 [27% vs. 35%, odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–1.86; P < 0.001]. In hospitalized patients, 30-day mortality decreased between the same periods (26% vs. 21%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59–0.80; P < 0.001). Long-term mortality decreased as well (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.67–0.82; P < 0.001). Women had higher 30-day mortality than men after acute repair, a sex difference that remained after age adjustment (17% vs. 12%, OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04–1.82; P = 0.006). Conclusion This population-based study detected a higher incidence of aortic dissection than prior reports, but a decreasing incidence in men. Surgical therapy was increasingly used and with more favourable outcome but was less frequently offered to elderly patients. The sustained sex differences regarding both incidence and outcome require further attention.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (16) ◽  
pp. 5851-5859
Author(s):  
Nadine L. Boer ◽  
Koen Rovers ◽  
Jacobus W.A. Burger ◽  
Eva V. E. Madsen ◽  
Alexandra R. M. Brandt‐Kerkhof ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document