scholarly journals Prognostic Impact of Resection Margin Status in Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Author(s):  
Mushegh A. Sahakyan ◽  
Caroline S. Verbeke ◽  
Tore Tholfsen ◽  
Dejan Ignjatovic ◽  
Dyre Kleive ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Resection margin status is considered one of the few surgeon-controlled parameters affecting prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). While studies mostly focus on resection margins in pancreatoduodenectomy, little is known about their role in distal pancreatectomy (DP). This study aimed to investigate resection margins in DP for PDAC. Methods Patients who underwent DP for PDAC between October 2004 and February 2020 were included (n = 124). Resection margins and associated parameters were studied in two consecutive time periods during which different pathology examination protocols were used: non-standardized (period 1: 2004–2014) and standardized (period 2: 2015–2020). Microscopic margin involvement (R1) was defined as ≤1 mm clearance. Results Laparoscopic and open resections were performed in 117 (94.4%) and 7 (5.6%) patients, respectively. The R1 rate for the entire cohort was 73.4%, increasing from 60.4% in period 1 to 83.1% in period 2 (p = 0.005). A significantly higher R1 rate was observed for the posterior margin (35.8 vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001) and anterior pancreatic surface (based on a 0 mm clearance; 18.9 vs. 35.4%, p = 0.045). Pathology examination period, poorly differentiated PDAC, and vascular invasion were associated with R1 in the multivariable model. Extended DP, positive anterior pancreatic surface, lymph node ratio, perineural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy, but not R1, were significant prognostic factors for overall survival in the entire cohort. Conclusions Pathology examination is a key determinant of resection margin status following DP for PDAC. A high R1 rate is to be expected when pathology examination is meticulous and standardized. Involvement of the anterior pancreatic surface affects prognosis.

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S826-S827
Author(s):  
M. Sahakyan ◽  
C. Verbeke ◽  
T. Tholfsen ◽  
D. Kleive ◽  
T. Buanes ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsengelmaa Jamiyan ◽  
Takayuki Shiraki ◽  
Yoshihiro Kurata ◽  
Masanori Ichinose ◽  
Keiichi Kubota ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1687
Author(s):  
Andrea Sambri ◽  
Emilia Caldari ◽  
Michele Fiore ◽  
Riccardo Zucchini ◽  
Claudio Giannini ◽  
...  

Adequacy of margins must take into consideration both the resection margin width (quantity) and anatomic barrier (quality). There are several classification schemes for reporting surgical resection margin status for soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Most of the studies regarding treatment outcomes in STS included all histologic grades and histological subtypes, which include infiltrative and non-infiltrative subtypes and are very heterogeneous in terms of both histologic characteristics and treatment modalities (adjuvant treatments or not). This lack of consistency makes it difficult to compare results from study to study. Therefore, there is a great need for evidence-based standardization concerning the width of resection margins. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature on margins, and to highlight the need for a uniform description of the margin status for patients with STS. Patient cases should be discussed at multidisciplinary tumor boards and treatments should be individualized to clinical and demographic characteristics, which must include also a deep knowledge of specific histotypes behaviors, particularly infiltrative ones.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 2438-2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunari Sasaki ◽  
Georgios A. Margonis ◽  
Kosuke Maitani ◽  
Nikolaos Andreatos ◽  
Jaeyun Wang ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 265 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantinos Simillis ◽  
Daniel L. H. Baird ◽  
Christos Kontovounisios ◽  
Nikhil Pawa ◽  
Gina Brown ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document