The Physical Environment and Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents - A Systematic Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 43 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Chris Penfold ◽  
Calum Mattocks ◽  
Alex Griffiths ◽  
Kate Tilling ◽  
Andy Ness ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Pablo Martinez‐Amezcua ◽  
Jonathan J. Suen ◽  
Frank Lin ◽  
Jennifer A. Schrack ◽  
Jennifer A. Deal

2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S201-S202
Author(s):  
Nico S. Rizzo ◽  
Jonatan R. Ruiz ◽  
Anita Hurtig-Wennlöf ◽  
Julia Wärnberg ◽  
Michael Sjöström

Author(s):  
Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho ◽  
Rafael Martins da Costa ◽  
Margarethe Thaisi Garro Knebel ◽  
Bruno Nunes de Oliveira ◽  
Camila Brasileiro de Araújo Silva ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to summarize data on the prevalence of global physical activity (PA) among children and adolescents in Brazil. This systematic review included an electronic search in 8 databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, SPORTDiscus, BIREME, Scielo, and Google Scholar) and a manual search in the references of retrieved studies. Observational studies that assessed global PA among Brazilian children and adolescents were included. A narrative approach toward results was adopted. An initial database search reached 3276 potentially relevant titles (2534 titles after duplicate analysis); 92 (62 different studies) met all inclusion criteria. Studies were carried out between 2001 and 2015; most studies were conducted in Southern and Northeastern Brazil. Three were nationwide surveys (4.8%), but no studies included children aged 0-5 years. Eighteen different instruments for PA measurement were used; only two studies used objectively-measured PA. The most used definition was ≥ 300 minutes/week of moderate-to-vigorous PA. The overall proportion of young people who were physically active ranged from 6.5% to 92.3%. Fourteen studies (22.6%) found a prevalence of ≥ 50%. Three nationwide surveys reported the prevalence of physically active students ranging from 29.0% to 66.0%. A wide variability of PA estimates were found. Important research gaps (e.g., studies with objectively-measured PA, children aged up to 6 years-old and in Northern Brazil) should be considered to develop new research studies in Brazil.


2021 ◽  
Vol 143 ◽  
pp. 106356
Author(s):  
Rema Ramakrishnan ◽  
Jian-Rong He ◽  
Anne-Louise Ponsonby ◽  
Mark Woodward ◽  
Kazem Rahimi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiying Ling ◽  
Lorraine B. Robbins ◽  
Fujun Wen ◽  
Wei Peng

Comprehensive evaluation of prior interventions designed to increase preschoolers’ physical activity is lacking. This systematic review aimed to examine the effect of interventions on objectively measured physical activity in children aged 2–5 years. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. In May 2014, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane, and Embase. Two reviewers independently identified and appraised the studies. Twenty-four articles describing 23 independent studies and 20 unique interventions met inclusion criteria. Of the 8 interventions resulting in a significant effect in objectively measured physical activity, all were center-based and included a structured physical activity component, 6 included multiple components, 5 integrated theories or models, and 4 actively involved parents. Seven of the 8 were randomized controlled trials. Due to the heterogeneity of the study designs, physical activity measures, and interventions, drawing definitive conclusions was difficult. Although the overall intervention effect was less than optimal, the review indicated that theory-driven, multicomponent interventions including a structured physical activity component and targeting both parents and their children may be a promising approach for increasing preschoolers’ physical activity and warrant continued investigation using rigorous designs to identify those that are most effective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document