scholarly journals Exploring silver as a contrast agent for contrast-enhanced dual-energy X-ray breast imaging

2014 ◽  
Vol 87 (1041) ◽  
pp. 20140081 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Karunamuni ◽  
A Tsourkas ◽  
A D A Maidment
Author(s):  
Pablo Milioni de Carvalho ◽  
Ann-Katherine Carton ◽  
Sylvie Saab-Puong ◽  
Răzvan Iordache ◽  
Serge Muller

2016 ◽  
Vol 89 (1067) ◽  
pp. 20150609 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpana D Kariyappa ◽  
Francis Gnanaprakasam ◽  
Subhapradha Anand ◽  
Murali Krishnaswami ◽  
Madan Ramachandran

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1870
Author(s):  
Arkadiusz Zegadło ◽  
Magdalena Żabicka ◽  
Aleksandra Różyk ◽  
Ewa Więsik-Szewczyk

For some time, dual energy computed tomography (DECT) has been an established method used in a vast array of clinical applications, including lung nodule assessment. The aim of this study was to analyze (using monochromatic DECT images) how the X-ray absorption of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) depends on the iodine contrast agent and when X-ray absorption is no longer dependent on the accumulated contrast agent. Sixty-six patients with diagnosed solid lung tumors underwent DECT scans in the late arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP) between January 2017 and June 2018. Statistically significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001) of the iodine contrast concentration were found in the energy range of 40–90 keV in the AP phase and in the range of 40–80 keV in the VP phase. The strongest correlation was found between the concentrations of the contrast agent and the scanning energy of 40 keV. At the higher scanning energy, no significant correlations were found. We concluded that it is most useful to evaluate lung lesions in DECT virtual monochromatic images (VMIs) in the energy range of 40–80 keV. We recommend assessing SPNs in only one phase of contrast enhancement to reduce the absorbed radiation dose.


1993 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 283-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Stern ◽  
R. Zamenhof ◽  
B. Dawson-Hughes
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 084653712110290
Author(s):  
Anat Kornecki

Objectives: The purpose of this article is to provide a detailed and updated review of the physics, techniques, indications, limitations, reporting, implementation and management of contrast enhanced mammography. Background: Contrast enhanced mammography (CEM), is an emerging iodine-based modified dual energy mammography technique. In addition to having the same advantages as standard full-field digital mammography (FFDM), CEM provides information regarding tumor enhancement, relying on tumor angiogenesis, similar to dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). This article reviews current literature on CEM and highlights considerations that are critical to the successful use of this modality. Conclusion: Multiple studies point to the advantage of using CEM in the diagnostic setting of breast imaging, which approaches that of DCE-MRI.


BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20210034
Author(s):  
Lidewij M.F.H. Neeter ◽  
H.P.J. (Frank) Raat ◽  
Rodrigo Alcantara ◽  
Quirien Robbe ◽  
Marjolein L. Smidt ◽  
...  

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a combination of standard mammography and iodinated contrast material administration. During the last decade, CEM has found its place in breast imaging protocols: after i.v. administration of iodinated contrast material, low-energy and high-energy images are retrieved in one acquisition using a dual-energy technique, and a recombined image is constructed enabling visualisation of areas of contrast uptake. The increased incorporation of CEM into everyday clinical practice is reflected in the installation of dedicated equipment worldwide, the (commercial) availability of systems from different vendors, the number of CEM examinations performed, and the number of scientific articles published on the subject. It follows that ever more radiologists will be confronted with this technique, and thus be required to keep up to date with the latest developments in the field. Most importantly, radiologists must have sufficient knowledge on how to interpret CEM images and be acquainted with common artefacts and pitfalls. This comprehensive review provides a practical overview of CEM technique, including CEM-guided biopsy; reading, interpretation and structured reporting of CEM images, including the accompanying learning curve, CEM artefacts and interpretation pitfalls; indications for CEM; disadvantages of CEM; and future developments.


Author(s):  
Roshan Karunamuni ◽  
Ajlan Al Zaki ◽  
Anatoliy V. Popov ◽  
E. James Delikatny ◽  
Sara Gavenonis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document