scholarly journals Cone beam CT and treatment decision of mandibular third molars: removal vs. coronectomy—a 3-year audit

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 20190250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Hauge Matzen ◽  
Julie Suhr Villefrance ◽  
Sven Erik Nørholt ◽  
Jesper Bak ◽  
Ann Wenzel
Keyword(s):  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Close Relation ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Panoramic Image ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Sensory Disturbances ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
The Impact

Objectives: To assess: (1) the workflow in the treatment decision process of mandibular third molars based on a panoramic image and CBCT and (2) the impact of radiographic markers in CBCT on the decision to perform coronectomy. Methods: 1437 teeth in 917 patients (mean age 27.8 years, range 18–72) underwent clinical and panoramic examination. If there was an indication for removal of the tooth, and signs of a close relation to the inferior alveolar nerve were present in the panoramic image, a CBCT was performed. Treatment decision based on panoramic image and CBCT was calculated. Statistical analyses were performed to assess whether signs in CBCT had an impact on the treatment decision “coronectomy”. Moreover, the actually operated teeth and post-operative sensory disturbances were assessed and discussed in relation to the radiographic method. Results: Based on the panoramic image, in 462 cases it was decided not to treat, 553 were scheduled for surgery, and 422 referred for a CBCT examination. “No bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal” seen in CBCT was the main factor influencing the decision to perform a coronectomy (odds ratio = 56.8, p < 0.001). 840 mandibular third molars had undergone surgical intervention, 152 had a coronectomy and 688 were fully removed. Six patients perceived a sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve: one permanent and five temporary. Conclusion: 29% of the examined cases were referred for a CBCT and of these, the majority were scheduled for coronectomy based on the sign “no bony separation between the tooth and mandibular canal” seen in CBCT.

scholarly journals Comparison of Digital OPG and CBCT in Assessment of Risk Factors Associated with Inferior Nerve Injury during Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 2282
Author(s):  
Rakhi Issrani ◽  
Namdeo Prabhu ◽  
Mohammed Sghaireen ◽  
Hasna Rasheed Alshubrmi ◽  
Amal Mohamed Alanazi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Canal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Impacted Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Molar ◽  
Impacted Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Background: Pre-operative radiographic assessment of the anatomical relationship between the roots of the mandibular third molar and the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is a must to minimize the risk of IAN injury during surgery. Objectives: To compare the radiographic signs of digital orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). An additional objective was to assess the cortex status between the mandibular canal and third molar on CBCT images in relation to the demographic characteristics, region (right or left side), and angulation of mandibular molar. Methodology: In this retrospective study, a total of 350 impacted mandibular third molars with a close relationship between the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) and impacted mandibular third molars on digital OPG were further referred for CBCT imaging for assessment of the position of the mandibular canal. The study was conducted between August 2018 and February 2020. Digital OPGs were evaluated for radiographic signs like interruption of the mandibular canal wall, darkening of the roots, diversion of the mandibular canal, and narrowing of the mandibular canal. The age and sex of patients, site of impacted third molar, Winter’s classification of mandibular third molar, position of IAC relative to impacted molar, and the radiographic markers of OPG were assessed for cortical integrity using CBCT. Chi square testing was applied to study the values of difference and binomial logistic regression was done to assess the factors associated with cortication. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Among 350 patients, 207 (59.1%) were male and 143 (40.9%) were female with a mean age of 36.8 years. The most common OPG sign was interruption of white line, seen in 179 (51.1%) cases. In total, 246 cases (70.3%) showed an absence of canal cortication between the mandibular canal and the impacted third molar on CBCT images. Cortication was observed in all cases with a combination of panoramic signs which was statistically significant (p = 0.047). Cortication was observed in 85 (50.6%) cases where IAC was positioned on the buccal side, 11 (16.9%) in cases of inferiorly positioned IAC, and just 8 (7.6%) for cases of lingually positioned IAC which was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Statistically insignificant (p > 0.05) results were noted for cortex status in CBCT images with regards to the age, sex, site, and angulation of impacted third molars. Conclusion: CBCT imaging is highly recommended for those cases where diversion of the mandibular canal is observed on OPG and when the roots are present between canals.

scholarly journals Cone beam CT imaging of the mandibular third molar: a position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR)

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 20190039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Hauge Matzen ◽  
Erwin Berkhout
Keyword(s):  
European Commission ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
European Academy ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars

Objectives: Lack of evidence on the use of CBCT for management of mandibular third molars in Radiation Protection guideline no. 172 of the European Commission made the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology (EADMFR) decide to update the recommendations of the guideline. Methods and materials: A literature search was performed addressing the following questions: (1) does CBCT change the treatment of the patient?; (2) does CBCT reduce the number of post-operative sensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve?; and (3) can CBCT predict the risk for a post-operative sensory disturbance of the inferior alveolar nerve? Results:  Since the European Commission published the guideline in 2012 several high-evidence studies on the use of CBCT before removal of mandibular third molars have been conducted including five randomized controlled clinical trials and one meta-analysis. Present literature allows to propose recommendations with highest level of evidence. Conclusion: New and up-to-date evidence-based recommendations advocate that CBCT imaging of the mandibular third molar should not be applied as a routine method before removal of mandibular third molars and therefore, CBCT imaging should only be applied when the surgeon has a very specific clinical question in an individual patient case that cannot be answered by conventional (panoramic and/or intraoral) imaging.

scholarly journals Coronectomy - A viable alternative to prevent inferior alveolar nerve injury

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Alok Sagtani ◽  
Reshu Agrawal Sagtani ◽  
Mehul Jaisani ◽  
Leeza Pradhan
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Viable Alternative ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Dry Socket ◽  
Root Exposure ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury

Background and Objectives: Coronectomy is a relatively new method to prevent the risk of Inferior Alveolar Nerve (IAN) injury during removal of lower third molars with limited scientific literature among Nepalese patients. Thus, a study was designed to evaluate coronectomy regarding its use, outcomes and complications.Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was conducted from December 2012 to December 2013 among patients attending Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dental Sciences, BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal for removal of mandibular third molars. After reviewing the radiograph for proximity of third molar to the IAN, coronectomy was advised. A written informed consent was obtained from the patients and coronectomy was performed. Patients were recalled after one week. The outcome measures in the follow-up visit were primary healing, pain, infection, dry socket, root exposure and IAN injury. The prevalence of IAN proximity of lower third molars and incidence of complications were calculated.Results: A total 300 mandibular third molars were extracted in 278 patients during the study period. Out of 300 impacted mandibular third molar, 41 (13.7%) showed close proximity to inferior alveolar nerve . The incidence of complications and failed procedure was 7.4% among the patients who underwent coronectomy. During the follow up visit, persistent pain and root exposure was reported while other complications like inferior alveolar nerve injury, dry socket and infection was not experienced by the study patients.Conclusion: With a success rate of 92.6% among the 41 patients, coronectomy is a viable alternative to conventional total extraction for mandibular third molars who have a higher risk for damage to the inferior alveolar nerve.JCMS Nepal. 2015;11(3):1-5.

Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography, stereo-scanography and cone beam CT for assessment of mandibular third molars before surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1391-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Hauge Matzen ◽  
Jennifer Christensen ◽  
Hanne Hintze ◽  
Søren Schou ◽  
Ann Wenzel
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam Ct ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document