scholarly journals Recent advances in understanding antiphospholipid syndrome

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Laura Bertolaccini ◽  
Giovanni Sanna
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Systemic Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Hughes Syndrome

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), also known as Hughes Syndrome, is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity in the presence of persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies. A patient with APS must meet at least one of two clinical criteria (vascular thrombosis or complications of pregnancy) and at least one of two laboratory criteria including the persistent presence of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), and/or anti-b2 glycoprotein I (anti-b2GPI) antibodies of IgG or IgM isotype at medium to high titres in patient’s plasma. However, several other autoantibodies targeting other coagulation cascade proteins (i.e. prothrombin) or their complex with phospholipids (i.e. phosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex), or to some domains of β2GPI, have been proposed to be also relevant to APS. In fact, the value of testing for new aPL specificities in the identification of APS in thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity patients is currently being investigated.

Relationship between antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin and conventional antiphospholipid antibodies in primary antiphospholipid syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariela Hoxha ◽  
Amelia Ruffatti ◽  
Elena Mattia ◽  
Lauro Meneghel ◽  
Marta Tonello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Coagulation Tests ◽  
Healthy Control ◽  
Independent Risk Factors ◽  
Ig G

AbstractAntiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin complex (aPS/PT) antibodies are emerging as an important marker for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). We aimed to compare their performance with that of conventional antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) such as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) in APS and to assess their frequency in APS-negative (APS-ne) patients.We considered 160 APS patients and 128 APS-ne patients with clinical criteria for APS but tested negative for conventional aPL. Immunoglobulin (Ig)G/IgM aPS/PT, IgG/IgM aCL, and IgG/IgM anti-β2GPI were detected using ELISA assay and LA with a series of coagulation tests.IgG aPS/PT were significantly associated with IgG aCL, IgG anti-β2GPI, and LA (p<0.0001 for all). IgM aPS/PT were significantly associated only with LA (p<0.0001) instead. There was a significant correlation between IgG aPS/PT and both IgG aCL and IgG anti-β2GPI levels (ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.40, respectively). Both IgG aPS/PT and IgM aPS/PT positivity significantly correlated with LA (ρ=0.44 and ρ=0.5, respectively). IgG and IgM aPS/PT were significantly more frequent in triple than in double and in single positivity (p<0.0001). According to multivariate analysis, IgG and/or IgM aPS/PT were independent risk factors for LA. APS/PT antibodies were found in 9.4% of the APS-ne patients vs. 2% of healthy control (p=0.043); those antibodies were significantly more frequent in the thrombosis with respect to the pregnancy morbidity subset (p=0.01).Our data attribute a clinical relevance to both IgG and IgM aPS/PT antibodies. In particular, the significant prevalence of aPS/PT in APS-ne patients suggests including them as additional laboratory criterion for APS.

The Clinical Relevance of Noncriteria Antiphospholipid Antibodies

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 453-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Sanna ◽  
Maria Bertolaccini
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Coagulation Cascade ◽  
Glycoprotein I

AbstractWhile lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL), anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) antibodies represent the best available and the most widely used tests in the investigation for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), evidence gathered in recent years indicates that other antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) specificities may also play a role in the syndrome. Several autoantibodies have been shown to be complexed with phospholipids other than cardiolipin, or to some domains of β2GPI, or else directed to other proteins of the coagulation cascade, and these have also been proposed to be of relevance to APS, and their diagnostic value and clinical utility are the focus of current research.

scholarly journals Challenges in the Diagnosis of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 930-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrien Devreese ◽  
Marc F Hoylaerts
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Lupus Anticoagulant ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Coagulation Tests

Abstract Background: The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of acquired thromboembolic complications and pregnancy morbidity. Its diagnosis is based on clinical and laboratory criteria, defined by strict guidelines. The original clinical and laboratory criteria for the identification of APS patients were published in 1999, in the so-called Sapporo criteria. In 2006 these criteria were revised, and recently more precise guidelines for analysis of the lupus anticoagulant have been provided. However, several questions related to the diagnosis of APS remain unanswered. Content: In addition to providing a historical perspective, this review covers several challenges in the diagnosis of APS with respect to clinical and laboratory features, while highlighting pathogenic pathways of the syndrome. We discuss ongoing dilemmas in the diagnosis of this complex disease. Although antiphospholipid antibodies are found in association with various clinical manifestations, the older established clinical criteria were not substantively altered in the 2006 update. Several laboratory tests recommended in the latest criteria, including phospholipid-dependent coagulation tests for the detection of the lupus anticoagulant and ELISAs for measuring anticardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein I antibodies, still show methodological and diagnostic shortcomings. In addition, antiphospholipid antibodies have been described against other antigens, but their clinical role remains uncertain. Conclusions: Despite updated APS criteria, diagnosis of this syndrome remains challenging. Further research on clinically relevant antibodies and standardization of their detection are needed to improve clinical risk assessment in APS.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 51-58
Author(s):  
Md. Motahar Hossain ◽  
Md. Akhter Hossain ◽  
Yasmin Rahman ◽  
Md. Kamrul Hasan
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Classification Criteria ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Pregnancy And Postpartum

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by venous thromboembolism, arterial thrombosis, and obstetric morbidities in the setting of persistently positive levels of antiphospholipid antibodies. It may be primary or secondary. The latest classification criteria (Sydney 2006) recognize just three tests to define this syndrome- lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-?2-glycoprotein-1 antibodies. Treatment of thrombotic events involves lifelong anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonist warfarin. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) with only pregnancy morbidity is treated with thromboprophylaxis with heparin during pregnancy and postpartum for 6 weeks. In this review we discuss the pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the APS.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: critical analysis of the diagnostic path

Lupus ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Pengo ◽  
A. Banzato ◽  
E. Bison ◽  
G. Denas ◽  
S. Padayattil Jose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Critical Analysis ◽  
Single Test ◽  
Single Class ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies ◽  
Domain I

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is diagnosed in the presence of vascular thrombosis or pregnancy morbidity occurring in patients with circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant [LA] and/or IgG/IgM anticardiolipin [aCL] and/or IgG/IgM anti-β2glycoprotein I [aβ2GPI] antibodies). Each test may identify different autoantibodies; a single test makes the diagnosis possible when positive on two or more occasions at least 12 weeks apart. However, single test positivity may be unrelated to pathogenic antibodies, which are now considered to be a subclass of aβ2GPI antibodies directed against the domain I of this protein. Conversely, all three positive tests identify a single class of aβ2GPI antibodies, thus identifying high-risk patients with APS.

scholarly journals Antiphospholipid syndrome: a clinical and laboratorial challenge

2014 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luci Maria Santana Dusse ◽  
Fernanda Dias e Silva ◽  
Letícia Gonçalves Freitas ◽  
Danyelle Romana Alves Rios ◽  
Sandra Cristina Armond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Anticardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Major Protein ◽  
Protein Targets ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Increased Sensitivity ◽  
Commercial Kits ◽  
Positive Results

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an acquired autoimmune thrombophilia characterized by the presence of a heterogeneous family of antibodies that bind to plasma proteins with affinity for phospholipid surfaces. The two major protein targets of antiphospholipid antibodies are prothrombin and β2-glycoprotein I (β2GPI). APS leads to aprothrombotic state, and it is characterized by the occurrence of arterial, venous or microvascular thrombosis or recurrent fetal loss. The diagnosis of APS is based on a set of clinical criteria and the detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) or anti-β2GPI in plasma. Although laboratory tests are essential for APS diagnosis, these tests have limitations associated with the robustness, reproducibility and standardization. The standardization of diagnostic tests for detection of APLAs has been a challenge and a variety of results have been obtained using different commercial kits and in-house techniques. An increased sensitivity of the ELISA kits for detection of ACA effectively has contributed to APS diagnosis. However, the lack of specificity associated with a high number of false-positive results is a clinical and laboratorial challenge, since such results may lead to mistaken clinical decisions, such as prescription of oral anticoagulant, leading to the risk of hemorrhaging. Furthermore, clinicians are often unfamiliar with these tests and have difficulty interpreting them, requiring interaction between clinical and laboratory professionals in order to ensure their correct interpretation.

scholarly journals Isolated IgA Anti-β2 Glycoprotein I Antibodies in Patients with Clinical Criteria for Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Ruiz-García ◽  
Manuel Serrano ◽  
José Ángel Martínez-Flores ◽  
Sergio Mora ◽  
Luis Morillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Arterial Thrombosis ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Diagnostic Systems ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Standardized Diagnostic ◽  
Disease Present

Seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome (SNAPS) is an autoimmune disease present in patients with clinical manifestations highly suggestive of Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) but with persistently negative consensus antiphospholipid antibodies (a-PL). IgA anti-β2 Glycoprotein I (aB2-GPI) antibodies are associated with APS. However, they are not currently considered to be laboratory criteria due to the heterogeneity of published works and the use of poor standardized diagnostic systems. We have aimed to assess aPL antibodies in a group of patients with clinical manifestations of APS (C-APS) to evaluate the importance of the presence of IgA aB2GPI antibodies in APS and its relation with other aPL antibodies. Only 14% of patients with C-APS were positive for any consensus antibody, whereas the presence of isolated IgA aB2GPI antibodies was found in 22% of C-APS patients. In patients with arterial thrombosis IgA aB2GPI, antibodies were the only aPL antibodies present. Serologic profile in primary APS (PAPS) is different from systemic autoimmune disorders associated APS (SAD-APS). IgA aB2GPI antibodies are more prevalent in PAPS and IgG aB2GPI antibodies are predominant in SAD-APS. The analysis of IgA aB2GPI antibodies in patients with clinical manifestations of PAPS might avoid underdiagnosed patients and provide a better diagnosis in patients with SAD-APS. Laboratory consensus criteria might consider including analysis of IgA aB2GPI for APS diagnosis.

Diagnosis and management of non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (01) ◽  
pp. 13-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel J. Machin ◽  
Ian J. Mackie ◽  
Hannah Cohen ◽  
Deepa R. Jayakody Arachchillage
Keyword(s):  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
In Vitro Fertilisation ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Glycoprotein I ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Studies ◽  
Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Obstetric Aps

SummaryAccurate diagnosis of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a prerequisite for optimal clinical management. The international consensus (revised Sapporo) criteria for obstetric APS do not include low positive anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti β2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies (> 99th centile) and/or certain clinical criteria such as two unexplained miscarriages, three non-consecutive miscarriages, late preeclampsia, placental abruption, late premature birth, or two or more unexplained in vitro fertilisation failures. In this review we examine the available evidence to address the question of whether patients who exhibit non-criteria clinical and/or laboratory manifestations should be included within the spectrum of obstetric APS. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies of women with pregnancy morbidity, particularly recurrent pregnancy loss, suggest that elimination of aCL and/or IgM aβ2GPI, or low positive positive aCL or aβ2GPI from APS laboratory diagnostic criteria may result in missing the diagnosis in a sizeable number of women who could be regarded to have obstetric APS. Such prospective and retrospective studies also suggest that women with non-criteria obstetric APS may benefit from standard treatment for obstetric APS with low-molecular-weight heparin plus low-dose aspirin, with good pregnancy outcomes. Thus, non-criteria manifestations of obstetric APS may be clinically relevant, and merit investigation of therapeutic approaches. Women with obstetric APS appear to be at a higher risk than other women of pre-eclampsia, placenta- mediated complications and neonatal mortality, and also at increased long-term risk of thrombotic events. The applicability of these observations to outcomes in women with non-criteria obstetric APS remains to be determined.

Microparticles: An Alternative Explanation to the Behavior of Vascular Antiphospholipid Syndrome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Álvarez ◽  
Carolina Rúa ◽  
Ángela P.J. Cadavid
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Antiphospholipid Syndrome ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Alternative Explanation ◽  
Murine Models ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome

AbstractAntiphospholipid syndrome is an autoimmune disease characterized by the persistent presence of antiphospholipid antibodies, along with occurrence of vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. The variety of antiphospholipid antibodies and their related mechanisms, as well as the behavior of disease in wide groups of patients, have led some authors to propose a differentiation of this syndrome into two independent entities: vascular and obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome. Thus, previous studies have discussed whether specific autoantibodies may be responsible for this differentiation or, in contrast, how the same antibodies are able to generate two different clinical presentations. This discussion is yet to be settled. The capability of serum IgG from patients with vascular thrombosis to trigger the biogenesis of endothelial cell-derived microparticles in vitro is one of the previously discussed differences between the clinical entities of antiphospholipid syndrome. These vesicles constitute a prothrombotic mechanism as they can directly lead to clot activation in murine models and recalcified human plasma. Nevertheless, other indirect mechanisms by which microparticles can spread a procoagulant phenotype could be critical to understanding their role in antiphospholipid syndrome. For this reason, questions regarding the cargo of microparticles, and the signaling pathways involved in their biogenesis, are of interest in attempting to explain the behavior of this autoimmune disease.

scholarly journals AB0408 DOES THE PRESENCE IN THE SERUM OF ANTIPHOSPHOLIPID ANTIBODIES CORRELATE WITH SPECIFIC/NON SPECIFIC CAPILLAROSCOPIC ABNORMALITIES?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1504.2-1504
Author(s):  
G. Ferrari ◽  
S. Paolino ◽  
A. Sulli ◽  
C. Pizzorni ◽  
G. Pacini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Antiphospholipid Antibodies ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Statistical Correlation ◽  
Systemic Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Vascular Thrombosis ◽  
Pregnancy Morbidity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cardiolipin Antibodies

Background:Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by specific vascular and obstetric manifestations and by antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) positivity [1].To date, little is known regarding nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC) alterations in APS patients and in asymptomatic aPL-carriers, non-specific abnormalities being the most frequently reported [2,3,4].Objectives:To retrospectively analyze NVC alterations in APS patients and in asymptomatic aPL-carriers and to correlate NCV alterations with both clinical manifestations and serum aPL profile.Methods:Thirty-five aPL positive patients having received at least one NCV investigation (mean age 47 years, range 16-81, 31 female and 4 male) were retrospectively included in the study. For each patient complete medical history was collected with a particular attention to past vascular thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Patients were classified as affected by APS according to the updated Sapporo classification criteria [5]. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC), IgM and IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies (ACL) and IgM and IgG anti-Beta2 Glycoprotein 1 (anti-B2GP1) were assessed in each patient according to the recommended procedures [5]. NCV parameters were analyzed in each patient, with a particular interest to hemorrhages or nailfold bed-parallel hemosiderin deposits (“comb-like”hemorrhages) presence [2,6]. Statistical analysis was performed by parametric and non-parametric tests.Results:Seventeen patients (mean age 49 years, range 16-81 years) were asymptomatic aPL-carriers and 18 (mean age 46 years, range 26-71 years) were affected by APS. Within APS patients, 16 had a history of vascular thrombosis and 2 had pregnancy morbidity; in 6 patients APS was secondary to other autoimmune rheumatologic conditions (3 to Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, 2 to vasculitides and 1 to Mixed Connective Tissue Disease).Among the total number of aPL-carriers and APS patients six patients showed a normal NVC pattern, 24 patients had non-specific NVC abmormalities and 5 patients had a “scleroderma-like” pattern. Interestingly, NCV microhemorrhages were significantly more frequent in APS patients than in asymptomatic aPL-carriers, both in score and in absolute (p=0.05 andp=0.04, respectively). Particularly, in APS patients “comb-like”hemorrhages had a statistically significant higher prevalence than isolated hemorrhages (p=0.03). Dilated capillaries score was significantly higher in APS patients than in asymptomatic aPL-carriers (p=0.01).Not any statistically significant difference was observed regarding other capillary parameters (score of giant capillaries, loss of capillaries, or anormal shpaes, i.e. angiogenesis). Not any statistical correlation was observed between NVC parameters and different aPL profile.Conclusion:The study shows that the total number of microhemorrhages and in particular the“comb-like”subtype, are significantly the most frequent specific abnormalities in APL patients when compared to asymptomatic aPL carriers. The presence of the “scleroderma like” NVC pattern may suggest a concomitant overlap syndrome. Not any correlation was found between aPL profile and other NVC parameters. Further studies need to develop a more specific APS NVC pattern for APS patients.References:[1]Tektonidou MG, et al RMD Open 2019; 5(1);[2]Cutolo M, Elsevier 2010, pp141-143;[3]Candela M, et al.1998:444-9;[4]Aslanidis S, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2011, 29:307-9;[5]Miyakis S, et al. J Thromb Haemost 2006, 4:295–306;[6]Cutolo M, et al Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22:1093-108Disclosure of Interests: :Giorgia Ferrari: None declared, Sabrina Paolino: None declared, Alberto Sulli Grant/research support from: Laboratori Baldacci, Carmen Pizzorni: None declared, Greta Pacini: None declared, Emanuele Gotelli: None declared, Adriano Lercara: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Maurizio Cutolo Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Actelion, Celgene, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Sigma-Alpha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document