Identifying Key Features of the Innovated Japanese Project Management: A Critical Review on its Philosophy

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201
Author(s):  
Low Foon Siang ◽  
Chong Heap Yih ◽  
Lee Wah Peng
2002 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willy Herroelen ◽  
Roel Leus ◽  
Erik Demeulemeester

Critical chain scheduling/Buffer management (CCS/BM)—the direct application of the theory of constraints (TOC) to project management—has received much attention in project management literature. There still is controversy over the merits and pitfalls of the CCS/BM methodology. This paper focuses on the fundamental elements of CCS/BM logic and pinpoints some intricacies that are not commonly referred to in the available literature. The authors’ analysis is based on a critical review of the relevant sources and experimentation with both commercial CCS/BM software and an internally developed CCS/BM-based tool.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 356-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Cerne ◽  
Johan Jansson

Purpose In this paper, the authors challenge traditional views of project management and sustainable development as purportedly complementing each other. Rather, the authors apply a projectification perspective from a multi-disciplinary approach to sustainable development. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how we can better understand the interface between projects and sustainable development through the study of its practices. Design/methodology/approach The authors do this by outlining the global and the local dimensions of sustainable development as a business objective. For that reason, the authors also make a distinction between sustainability in projects and sustainable development through project coordination. Findings From the framing of sustainable development as projectification, the authors contribute with a set of research implications on how to proceed towards a better understanding of sustainable development through project coordination. Originality/value The paper contributes to a growing field of interest regarding the interfaces between project management and sustainable development.


This chapter covers a number of key features of games in relation to their design and purpose and looks at previously suggested theoretical models and their criteria for effectiveness. Findings from a game study in which players' emotions have been recorded at three points during play are considered, along with some recorded views of tutors conducting those games. Nine games of the Mixed Reality (MR) genre (denoted G1 – G9), all subjects of previous studies, are then looked into, five from earlier publications and a further four conducted as part of the same postgraduate teaching programme in a U.K. University.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (31) ◽  
pp. 7260-7269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana M. Ramos ◽  
Marcelo O. Rodrigues ◽  
Brenno A. D. Neto

This critical short review focuses on some key features which determine successful enantioselective catalysed multicomponent reactions (MCRs) and are typically underappreciated in the literature.


2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 457-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Hällgren ◽  
Andreas Nilsson ◽  
Tomas Blomquist ◽  
Anders Söderholm

Author(s):  
Vittal S. Anantatmula ◽  
James B. Webb

Critical Path (CP) method has been under scrutiny in recent years as the next evolution of project schedule development, the Critical Chain (CC) project management is gaining attention. Advocates of the Critical Chain method cite the Critical Path method's failure to address uncertainty properly. The purpose of this paper is to apply some of the features of the Critical Chain concepts to traditional approach of Critical Path for projects. More importantly, this research effort aims to demonstrate the applicability of CCPM to managing a portfolio of projects. The analysis, based on a critical review of past studies, experiments in both Critical Path and Critical Chain techniques, and a case study, presents recommendations to gain benefits of Critical Chain in a traditional Critical Path scheduling environment and to manage portfolio of projects or programs using some of the concepts of the Critical Chain Method.


2016 ◽  
pp. 1005-1022
Author(s):  
Vittal S. Anantatmula ◽  
James B. Webb

Critical Path (CP) method has been under scrutiny in recent years as the next evolution of project schedule development, the Critical Chain (CC) project management is gaining attention. Advocates of the Critical Chain method cite the Critical Path method's failure to address uncertainty properly. The purpose of this paper is to apply some of the features of the Critical Chain concepts to traditional approach of Critical Path for projects. More importantly, this research effort aims to demonstrate the applicability of CCPM to managing a portfolio of projects. The analysis, based on a critical review of past studies, experiments in both Critical Path and Critical Chain techniques, and a case study, presents recommendations to gain benefits of Critical Chain in a traditional Critical Path scheduling environment and to manage portfolio of projects or programs using some of the concepts of the Critical Chain Method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document