scholarly journals Measurement of pathological personality traits according to Section III of the DSM-5: A Polish adaptation of PID-5. Part I – Theoretical foundations

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Rowiński ◽  
Monika Kowalska-Dąbrowska ◽  
Włodzimierz Strus ◽  
Jan Cieciuch ◽  
Iwona Czuma ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Rowiński ◽  
Monika Kowalska-Dąbrowska ◽  
Włodzimierz Strus Strus ◽  
Jan Cieciuch ◽  
Iwona Czuma ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 416-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A. Dowgwillo ◽  
Kim S. Ménard ◽  
Robert F. Krueger ◽  
Aaron L. Pincus

The purpose of this study was to examine associations between pathological personality traits identified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed., DSM-5) Section III alternative model of personality disorder (using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5; PID-5) and intimate partner violence (IPV; using the Conflict Tactics Scale [CTS]) in a sample of male (N = 1,106) and female (N = 1,338) college students. In this sample, self and partner perpetration of CTS Relationship Violence and CTS Negotiation tactics loaded onto 2 separate factors. The PID-5 facets and domains were differentially associated with these factors for both men and women. Facets and domains explained 10.1%–16.1% and 5.8%–10.6% of the variance in CTS Relationship Violence tactics, respectively. For both genders, detachment was positively associated with relationship violence. Antagonism was uniquely associated with relationship violence for women, whereas disinhibition was uniquely associated with relationship violence for men. Associations with lower level pathological personality facets were also examined. Overall, results indicate that DSM-5 pathological personality traits are associated with IPV reported by both men and women.


SAGE Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401772512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanesa C. Góngora ◽  
Alejandro Castro Solano

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy Y. See ◽  
Theo A. Klimstra ◽  
Mattis van den Bergh ◽  
Jelle J. Sijtsema ◽  
Jaap J. A. Denissen

Assessment ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aidan G. C. Wright ◽  
Aaron L. Pincus ◽  
Katherine M. Thomas ◽  
Christopher J. Hopwood ◽  
Kristian E. Markon ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas de Francisco Carvalho ◽  
Wellington Arruda

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate and compare pathological personality traits in meditation practitioners and non-practitioners. Therefore, data were collected from 104 participants of both sexes aged over 18 years, including 53 practitioners of concentrative and mindfulness meditation styles, and 51 non-practitioners. Participants responded to the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP), the Brazilian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), and an anamnesis questionnaire about the practice of meditation; we proceeded to repeated ANOVA measures and logistic regression analysis to verify the study’s goals. Overall, higher means were observed for non-practitioners in the dimensions/factors of the tests, and specific pathological traits as best predictors of the participating groups (practitioners versus non-practitioners). The results indicated that the meditators tended to have lower intensity of pathological personality traits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document