scholarly journals Usefulness of the Clock Drawing Test as a Cognitive Screening Instrument for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia: an Evaluation Using Three Scoring Systems

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangsoon Kim ◽  
Seungmin Jahng ◽  
Kyung-Ho Yu ◽  
Byung-Chul Lee ◽  
Yeonwook Kang
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Screening Instrument ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Mild Dementia ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test

Is the Clock Drawing Test a screening tool for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment? A systematic review

2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Ehreke ◽  
Melanie Luppa ◽  
Hans-Helmut König ◽  
Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Diagnosis Of Dementia ◽  
Mean Differences

ABSTRACTBackground:The clock drawing test (CDT) is a common and widely used cognitive screening instrument for the diagnosis of dementia. However, it has remained unclear whether it is a suitable method to identify mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The aim of this paper is to review systematically the studies concerning the utility of the CDT in diagnosing MCI.Method:A systematic literature search was conducted. All studies dealing with utility of CDT in diagnosing MCI regardless of the applied CDT scoring system and MCI concept were selected.Results:Nine relevant studies were identified. The majority of the studies compared average CDT scores of cognitively healthy and mildly impaired subjects, and four of them identified significant mean differences. If reported, sensitivity and specificity have been mostly unsatisfactory.Conclusion:CDT should not be used for MCI-screening.

Clock Drawing Test – screening utility for mild cognitive impairment according to different scoring systems: results of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+)

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1592-1601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Ehreke ◽  
Tobias Luck ◽  
Melanie Luppa ◽  
Hans-Helmut König ◽  
Arno Villringer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

ABSTRACTBackground: There is a strong demand for screening instruments for mild cognitive impairment (MCI), as a pre-stage of dementia. The clock drawing test (CDT) is widely used to screen for dementia, but the utility in screening for MCI remains uncertain. In particular, it is still questionable which scoring system is the best in order to screen for MCI. We therefore aimed to compare the utility of different CDT scoring systems for screening for MCI.Methods: In a sample of 428 subjects of the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA 75+) study, CDT scores of different scoring systems were compared between subjects with and without MCI. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC; area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity) was performed and inter-rater reliability was calculated.Results: The CDT scores differed significantly between MCI and non-MCI subjects according to all scoring systems applied. However, ROC of the CDT scores was not adequate.Conclusions: None of the present CDT scoring systems has sufficient utility to screen reliably for MCI. The clinical value of the CDT could be improved by using semi-quantitative scoring, having a wider score range and focusing on specific details of the clock (e.g. the hands and numbers).

The Reliability of Clock Drawing Test Scoring Systems Modeled on the Normative Data in Healthy Aging and Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment

Assessment ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 945-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adela Fendrych Mazancova ◽  
Tomas Nikolai ◽  
Hana Stepankova ◽  
Miloslav Kopecek ◽  
Ondrej Bezdicek
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Normative Data ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test

The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a commonly used tool in clinical practice and research for cognitive screening among older adults. The main goal of the present study was to analyze the interrater reliability of three different CDT scoring systems (by Shulman et al., Babins et al., and Cohen et al.). We used a clock with a predrawn circle. The CDT was evaluated by three independent raters based on the normative data set of healthy older and very old adults and patients with nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI; N = 438; aged 61-94). We confirmed a high interrater reliability measured by the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs): Shulman ICC = .809, Babins ICC = .894, and Cohen ICC = .862, all p < .001. We found that age and education levels have a significant effect on CDT performance, yet there was no influence of gender. Finally, the scoring systems differentiated between naMCI and age- and education-matched controls: Shulman’s area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = .84, Cohen AUC = .71, all p < .001; and a slightly lower discriminative ability was shown by Babins: AUC = .65, p = .012.

scholarly journals The Clock Drawing Test: Performance differences between the free-drawn and incomplete-copy versions in patients with MCI and dementia

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bárbara Costa Beber ◽  
Renata Kochhann ◽  
Bruna Matias ◽  
Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Scoring Method ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Healthy Elderly ◽  
Drawing Test

ABSTRACT Background: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a brief cognitive screening tool for dementia. Several different presentation formats and scoring methods for the CDT are available in the literature. Objective: In this study we aimed to compare performance on the free-drawn and "incomplete-copy" versions of the CDT using the same short scoring method in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and dementia patients, and healthy elderly participants. Methods: 90 participants (controlled for age, sex and education) subdivided into control group (n=20), MCI group (n=30) and dementia group (n=40) (Alzheimer's disease - AD=20; Vascular Dementia - VD=20) were recruited for this study. The participants performed the two CDT versions at different times and a blinded neuropsychologist scored the CDTs using the same scoring system. Results: The scores on the free-drawn version were significantly lower than the incomplete-copy version for all groups. The dementia group had significantly lower scores on the incomplete-copy version of the CDT than the control group. MCI patients did not differ significantly from the dementia or control groups. Performance on the free-drawn copy differed significantly among all groups. Conclusion: The free-drawn CDT version is more cognitively demanding and sensitive for detecting mild/early cognitive impairment. Further evaluation of the diagnostic value (accuracy) of the free-drawn CDT in Brazilian MCI patients is needed.

Validity and Clinical Utility of Different Clock Drawing Test Scoring Systems in Multiple Forms of Dementia

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Duro ◽  
Miguel Tábuas-Pereira ◽  
Sandra Freitas ◽  
Beatriz Santiago ◽  
Maria Amália Botelho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Lewy Bodies ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Cognitive Screening ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Screening Measure ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Cognitive Screening Measure

The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) has a known potential for the detection of cognitive impairment in populations with dementia, especially Alzheimer disease (AD). Our aim was to compare the clinical utility of 3 CDT scoring systems (Rouleau, Cahn, and Babins) in several pathologies with cognitive compromise from a tertiary center memory clinic. We selected patients with a clinical diagnosis of mild stage AD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD), vascular dementia (VaD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and Parkinson disease with dementia (PDD). The results showed significant differences between the several diagnoses with the following pattern of results: AD, DLB < FTD, VaD, PDD. Qualitative analysis of clock drawing errors confirmed the stimulus-bound response as a hallmark of AD, while conceptual deficit was significantly more prevalent in patients with AD and DLB. Our results supported the CDT potential as a cognitive screening measure for mild dementia, particularly sensitive to AD and DLB, especially when we used the Cahn scoring system and its analysis of qualitative errors.

Does the Combination of the MMSE and Clock Drawing Test (Mini-Clock) Improve the Detection of Mild Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment?

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 889-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Cacho ◽  
Julián Benito-León ◽  
Ricardo García-García ◽  
Bernardino Fernández-Calvo ◽  
José Luis Vicente-Villardón ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test

P2-378: FUNCTIONAL MRI OF THE CLOCK-DRAWING TEST IN MILD COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (7S_Part_15) ◽  
pp. P841-P842
Author(s):  
Natasha A. Talwar ◽  
Nathan W. Churchill ◽  
Megan A. Hird ◽  
Tahira Tasneem ◽  
Iryna Pshonyak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Functional Mri ◽  
Clock Drawing Test ◽  
Clock Drawing ◽  
Drawing Test
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document