From “Unbestimmtstellen” to “Leerstellen” and “campo di possibilità interpretative”. How Current is Ingarden’s Theory of Literature?

Author(s):  
Rômulo Eisinger Guimarães
Keyword(s):  
1944 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
B. E. C. Davis ◽  
Sigmund K. Proctor
Keyword(s):  

Telos ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 1973 (18) ◽  
pp. 107-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Sanders

1981 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
Liliane Welch ◽  
Christina Howells ◽  
Sartre
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
William N. Whisner ◽  
Jerome P. Schiller
Keyword(s):  

1989 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Brown ◽  
Albert Gilman

ABSTRACTPenelope Brown and Stephen Levinson (1987) have proposed that power (P), distance (D), and the ranked extremity (R) of a face-threatening act are the universal determinants of politeness levels in dyadic discourse. This claim is tested here for Shakespeare's use of Early Modern English in Hamlet, King Lear, Macbeth, and Othello. The tragedies are used because: (1) dramatic texts provide the best information on colloquial speech of the period; (2) the psychological soliloquies in the tragedies provide the access to inner life that is necessary for a proper test of politeness theory; and (3) the tragedies represent the full range of society in a period of high relevance to politeness theory. The four plays are systematically searched for pairs of minimally contrasting dyads where the dimensions of contrast are power (P), distance (D), and intrinsic extremity (R). Whenever such a pair is found, there are two speeches to be scored for politeness and a prediction from theory as to which should be more polite. The results for P and for R are those predicted by theory, but the results for D are not. The two components of D, interactive closeness and affect, are not closely associated in the plays. Affect strongly influences politeness (increased liking increases politeness and decreased liking decreases politeness); interactive closeness has little or no effect on politeness. The uses of politeness for the delineation of character in the tragedies are illustrated. (Politeness theory, speech act theory, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, theory of literature, Shakespeare studies)


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36
Author(s):  
Anis Wijayanti ◽  
Yusro Edy N. ◽  
Hardyanto .

ABSTRACT   Panitibaya fiber is one of the piwulang Javanese texts that needs to be preserved because the teachings contained in it are still very beneficial for the community. For that Panitibaya Fiber will be examined on (1) how the sound layer in Panitibaya Fiber, (2) how the meaning layer in  Panitibaya Fiber, (3) how the object layer in Panitbaya Fiber, (4) Moral Value in Panitibaya Fiber. This study uses a literary sociology approach according to Ian Watt. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. The data used in this study is the text of the Fiber Panitibaya written by Bathara Katong. Data collection techniques in this study were heuristic and hermeneutic reading methods. The analysis technique uses an analysis of the building blocks of poetry Roman Ingarden which includes sound layers, meaning layers, object layers. From the data, it was analyzed using Ian Watt's sociology theory of literature to find out the teachings contained in Panitibaya Fiber. The results of this study indicate that the existence of sound layers, layers of meaning and layers of objects, as well as moral values ​​contained in the Panitibaya Fiber for pursuing are summarized as eleven teachings as follows, (1) obligations to the Creator, (2) disgraceful qualities that must be shunned, (3) commendable traits, (4) actions that are not justified for men, (5) attitudes that must be considered in speech, (6) ancestral messages, (7) people who are not approachable, (8) actions related to children, (9) actions related to firearms, (10) there are visits and neighbors, and (11) attitude in handling a job. The teachings of the Panitibaya Fiber need to be disseminated in the Javanese community, either through print media or online media. Keywords: Panitibaya Fiber, Prohibition of pursuing life, Sociology of literature.


2019 ◽  
pp. 180-190
Author(s):  
Nargiza MAKHMUDOVA

Статья посвящена изучению терминологических несоотвествий в классификации литературных произведений.Материалами исследования служат литературоведческие словари и энциклопедии, а также ряд трудов по теории литературы. Цель работы — рассмотреть различные классификации и категоризации, а также проблемы терминологического характера в определении романа как вида или жанра. В ходе работы был выявлен терминологический разнобой в классификации на роды, виды и жанры переводческого характера.Точность и ясность терминологических определений не всегда возможна, однако упорядочение терминологии является важным для науки. Мақола адабий асарларни таснифлашда учрайдиган атамалар номувофиқликларини ўрганишга бағишланган. Адабий луғатлар ва энциклопедиялар, шунингдек, адабиёт назариясига оид бир қанча асарлар тадқиқот материалларини ташкил топган. Ишнинг мақсади — романнинг тур ёки жанр сифатидаги хусусиятини аниқлашда адабиётшуносликда мавжуд турли таснифлаш ва тоифалашга оид турли назарий қарашларни кўриб чиқишдан иборат. Таҳлил жараёнида тур, хил ва жанрларни таснифлашда таржима билан боғлиқ бўлган атамалар номувофиқлиги аниқланди. Атамалар ва улар таърифларининг аниқ ва равшанлигини ҳар доим ҳам сақлаб қолишнинг имкони йўқ, аммоуларни тартибга солиш илм-фан учун жуда муҳимдир. The article is devoted to the study of terminological inconsistencies in the classification of literary works. The research materials are literary dictionaries and encyclopedias, as well as a number of works on the theory of literature. The purpose of the work is to consider various classifications and categorizations, as well as the problems of terminological definitions of a novel as a type of a genre.In the course of the analysis, a terminological discrepancy was identified in the classification for the genus, types and genres at the level of translation. Accuracy and clarity of terminological definitions is not always possible, however, the systematization of terminology is important for science.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document