Apical Transportation and Centering Ability : A Comparison of Two-Single File Systems after Instrumentation to the Major Foramen and after Overinstrumentation in Curved Root Canals

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59
Author(s):  
Haddad , Gaby ◽  
Adhami , Mayssa ◽  
Nehmé , Walid ◽  
Naaman , Alfred ◽  
Khalil , Issam
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Single File ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals Influence of cervical preflaring on apical transportation in curved root canals instrumented by reciprocating file systems

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neisiana Barbieri ◽  
Denise Piotto Leonardi ◽  
Marina Samara Baechtold ◽  
Gisele Maria Correr ◽  
Marilisa Carneiro Leão Gabardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals A micro-CT evaluation of the performance of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in shaping ability of curved root canals

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoel Damião SOUSA-NETO ◽  
Bruno Monguilhott CROZETA ◽  
Fabiane Carneiro LOPES ◽  
Jardel Francisco MAZZI-CHAVES ◽  
Rodrigo Dantas PEREIRA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
Micro Ct ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Single File ◽  
Ct Evaluation ◽  
Shaping Ability ◽  
Curved Root Canals

Efficiency of Different Nickel-Titanium Endodontic File Systems in Cleaning and Apical Transportation of Simulated Curved Root Canals

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 957-961
Author(s):  
Andrea Csinszka Kovacs Ivacson ◽  
Mariana Pacurar ◽  
Monica Monea ◽  
Monika Kovacs ◽  
Mihai Pop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
File Systems ◽  
Nickel Titanium ◽  
Endodontic Treatment ◽  
Root Canal Treatment ◽  
Cleaning Efficiency ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals ◽  
Reference Areas

The use of nickel-titanium instruments have become an important part of the root canal treatment, in order to facilitate the cleaning and shaping of root canals, because the incorrect utilization of the endodontic files during endodontic treatment may produce unwanted procedural errors. The aim of this study was to evaluate on simulated curved root canal models the cleaning efficiency and the apical transportation in three reference areas of the root canal files, ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer), K3XF (Sybron Endo) and HyFlex (Coltene Endo) systems, compared to the hand K-files (DentsplyMaillefer). According to our results, rotary file systems are more efficient than the hand files, in cleaning the root canal.

scholarly journals Influence of motion pattern on apical transportation and centering ability of WaveOne single-file technique in curved root canals

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omid Dianat ◽  
Mandana Naseri ◽  
Payam Paymanpour ◽  
Ali Kangarloo ◽  
Sahar Haddadpur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Motion Pattern ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Single File ◽  
Apical Transportation ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals Canal shaping of different single-file systems in curved root canals

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-332
Author(s):  
Maurizio D'Amario ◽  
Francesco De Angelis ◽  
Maddalena Mancino ◽  
Massimo Frascaria ◽  
Mario Capogreco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Single File ◽  
Canal Shaping ◽  
Curved Root Canals

scholarly journals Histological evaluation of the cleaning effectiveness of two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc versus WaveOne

2015 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 080-086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maira de Souza Carvalho ◽  
Emílio Carlos Sponchiado ◽  
Angela Delfina Bitencourt Garrido ◽  
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia ◽  
André Augusto Franco Marques
Keyword(s):  
File Systems ◽  
Negative Control Group ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Histological Evaluation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Single File ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Digital Microscope ◽  
Curved Root Canals

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cleaning effectiveness achieved with two reciprocating single-file systems in severely curved root canals: Reciproc and WaveOne. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five mesial roots of mandibular molars were randomly separated into two groups, according to the instrumentation system used. The negative control group consisted of five specimens that were not instrumented. The mesial canals (buccal and lingual) in Reciproc Group were instrumented with file R25 and the WaveOne group with the Primary file. The samples were submitted to histological processing and analyzed under a digital microscope. Results: The WaveOne group presented a larger amount of debris than the Reciproc Group, however, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). A larger amount of debris in the control group was observed, with statistically significant difference to Reciproc and WaveOne groups (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The two reciprocating single-file instrumentation systems presented similar effectiveness for root canal cleaning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document