scholarly journals Heterogeneity and Network Structure in the Dynamics of Diffusion: Comparing Agent-Based and Differential Equation Models

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 998-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazhir Rahmandad ◽  
John Sterman
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (176) ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Nardini ◽  
Ruth E. Baker ◽  
Matthew J. Simpson ◽  
Kevin B. Flores

Agent-based models provide a flexible framework that is frequently used for modelling many biological systems, including cell migration, molecular dynamics, ecology and epidemiology. Analysis of the model dynamics can be challenging due to their inherent stochasticity and heavy computational requirements. Common approaches to the analysis of agent-based models include extensive Monte Carlo simulation of the model or the derivation of coarse-grained differential equation models to predict the expected or averaged output from the agent-based model. Both of these approaches have limitations, however, as extensive computation of complex agent-based models may be infeasible, and coarse-grained differential equation models can fail to accurately describe model dynamics in certain parameter regimes. We propose that methods from the equation learning field provide a promising, novel and unifying approach for agent-based model analysis. Equation learning is a recent field of research from data science that aims to infer differential equation models directly from data. We use this tutorial to review how methods from equation learning can be used to learn differential equation models from agent-based model simulations. We demonstrate that this framework is easy to use, requires few model simulations, and accurately predicts model dynamics in parameter regions where coarse-grained differential equation models fail to do so. We highlight these advantages through several case studies involving two agent-based models that are broadly applicable to biological phenomena: a birth–death–migration model commonly used to explore cell biology experiments and a susceptible–infected–recovered model of infectious disease spread.


Author(s):  
Simon Martina-Perez ◽  
Matthew J. Simpson ◽  
Ruth E. Baker

Equation learning aims to infer differential equation models from data. While a number of studies have shown that differential equation models can be successfully identified when the data are sufficiently detailed and corrupted with relatively small amounts of noise, the relationship between observation noise and uncertainty in the learned differential equation models remains unexplored. We demonstrate that for noisy datasets there exists great variation in both the structure of the learned differential equation models and their parameter values. We explore how to exploit multiple datasets to quantify uncertainty in the learned models, and at the same time draw mechanistic conclusions about the target differential equations. We showcase our results using simulation data from a relatively straightforward agent-based model (ABM) which has a well-characterized partial differential equation description that provides highly accurate predictions of averaged ABM behaviours in relevant regions of parameter space. Our approach combines equation learning methods with Bayesian inference approaches so that a quantification of uncertainty can be given by the posterior parameter distribution of the learned model.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiko Enderling

For quantitative cancer models to be meaningful and interpretable the number of unknown parameters must be kept minimal. Experimental data can be utilized to calibrate model dynamics rates or rate constants. Proper integration of experimental data, however, depends on the chosen theoretical framework. Using live imaging of cell proliferation as an example, we show how to derive cell cycle distributions in agent-based models and averaged proliferation rates in differential equation models. We focus on a tumor hierarchy of cancer stem and progenitor non-stem cancer cells.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 1054-1059
Author(s):  
Bin Yang ◽  
Yuehui Chen

: Reconstruction of gene regulatory networks (GRN) plays an important role in understanding the complexity, functionality and pathways of biological systems, which could support the design of new drugs for diseases. Because differential equation models are flexible androbust, these models have been utilized to identify biochemical reactions and gene regulatory networks. This paper investigates the differential equation models for reverse engineering gene regulatory networks. We introduce three kinds of differential equation models, including ordinary differential equation (ODE), time-delayed differential equation (TDDE) and stochastic differential equation (SDE). ODE models include linear ODE, nonlinear ODE and S-system model. We also discuss the evolutionary algorithms, which are utilized to search the optimal structures and parameters of differential equation models. This investigation could provide a comprehensive understanding of differential equation models, and lead to the discovery of novel differential equation models.


Complexity ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Ahmed A. Mahmoud ◽  
Sarat C. Dass ◽  
Mohana S. Muthuvalu ◽  
Vijanth S. Asirvadam

This article presents statistical inference methodology based on maximum likelihoods for delay differential equation models in the univariate setting. Maximum likelihood inference is obtained for single and multiple unknown delay parameters as well as other parameters of interest that govern the trajectories of the delay differential equation models. The maximum likelihood estimator is obtained based on adaptive grid and Newton-Raphson algorithms. Our methodology estimates correctly the delay parameters as well as other unknown parameters (such as the initial starting values) of the dynamical system based on simulation data. We also develop methodology to compute the information matrix and confidence intervals for all unknown parameters based on the likelihood inferential framework. We present three illustrative examples related to biological systems. The computations have been carried out with help of mathematical software: MATLAB® 8.0 R2014b.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document