scholarly journals Policy Agenda-Setting and Causal Stories: Examining How Organized Interests redefined the Problem of Refugee Health Policy in Canada

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Valentina Antonipillai ◽  
Julia Abelson ◽  
Olive Wahoush ◽  
Andrea Baumann ◽  
Lisa Schwartz
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Votruba ◽  
Jonathan Grant ◽  
Graham Thornicroft

Abstract Background Mental health remains a neglected issue on the global health policy agenda, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and the translation of research evidence into policy and practice is slow. The new EVITA framework was developed to improve mental health evidence uptake and policy agenda-setting in LMICs. In addition, behavioural science methods may be able to support knowledge translation to policy. Methods Using a mixed-methods study design, we applied and tested the newly developed EVITA 1.1 framework against three case studies related to South Africa at the district, national and international levels. In-depth interviews with 26 experts were conducted between August and November 2019, transcribed, coded and analysed in NVivo, using iterative categorization. The data were analysed against both the EVITA framework and the MINDSPACE framework for behavioural insights. Results In our case study comparison, we found that (1) research translation to the policy agenda occurs in a complex, fluid system which includes multiple “research clouds”, “policy spheres” and other networks; (2) mental health research policy agenda-setting is based on key individuals and intermediaries and their interrelationships; and (3) key challenges and strategies for successful research to policy agenda impact are known, but are frequently not strategically implemented, such as including all stakeholders to overcome the policy implementation gap. Our data also suggest that behavioural science methods can be strategically applied to support knowledge translation to policy agenda-setting. Conclusion We found that the EVITA framework is useful for understanding and improving mental health research policy interrelationships to support evidence uptake to the policy agenda, and that behavioural science methods are effective support mechanisms. The revised EVITA 2.0 framework therefore includes behavioural insights, for improved mental health policy agenda-setting in LMICs. More research is needed to understand whether EVITA can be applied to other LMICs and to high-income contexts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  
Hilal Salim Al Shams ◽  
Abdullah Ghthaith Almutairi

The prevalence of obesity is rising rapidly in Australia. This issue can be a priority for agenda setting, by using the Hall and Kingdon models. Furthermore, the current policy may need to be reviewed or updated because of the high prevalence of obesity and the rate of death.


JAMA ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 257 (23) ◽  
pp. 3228
Author(s):  
Severine Brocki
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracy E. Miller

Responding to mounting public concern about the shift to managed care, legislation to grant patient protections has dominated the health policy agenda over the past two years. Although some policies, such as laws on maternity length of stay, can be easily dismissed as “body part by body part” micromanagement of medical practice, other initiatives offer substantive, new rights to patients across the spectrum of care. At both the state and the federal levels, the right of enrollees to appeal a denial of treatment or to file grievances about other plan decisions has emerged as a centerpiece of patient protection legislation. Grievance and appeal rights have been embraced as a way to empower patients, to enhance access to treatment, and to improve the quality of care by providing an external mechanism to review treatment denials.


JAMA ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 254 (17) ◽  
pp. 2440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Balfe

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document