scholarly journals A206 Accuracy of the 3D-pose estimation of total knee arthroplasty using single plane fluoroscopic image

Author(s):  
Koichi KOBAYASHI ◽  
Makoto SAKAMOTO ◽  
Yuji TANABE ◽  
Takashi SATO ◽  
Go OMORI ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 226-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Rodrigues ◽  
Michel Antunes ◽  
Carolina Raposo ◽  
Pedro Marques ◽  
Fernando Fonseca ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (1) ◽  
pp. 105-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Lynch ◽  
Diana M. Perriman ◽  
Jennie M. Scarvell ◽  
Mark R. Pickering ◽  
Catherine R. Galvin ◽  
...  

Aims Modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prostheses are designed to restore near normal kinematics including high flexion. Kneeling is a high flexion, kinematically demanding activity after TKA. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by six-degrees-of-freedom in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomized clinical trial compared kneeling kinematics in three TKA designs. Methods In total, 68 patients were randomized to either a posterior stabilized (PS-FB), cruciate-retaining (CR-FB), or rotating platform (CR-RP) design. Of these patients, 64 completed a minimum one year follow-up. Patients completed full-flexion kneeling while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Kinematics were calculated by registering the 3D implant models onto 2D-dynamic fluoroscopic images and exported for analysis. Results CR-FB designs had significantly lower maximal flexion (mean 116° (SD 2.1°)) compared to CR-RP (123° (SD 1.6°)) and PS-FB (125° (SD 2.1°)). The PS-FB design displayed a more posteriorly positioned femur throughout flexion. Furthermore, the CR-RP femur was more externally rotated throughout kneeling. Finally, individual patient kinematics showed high degrees of variability within all designs. Conclusion The increased maximal flexion found in the PS-FB and CR-RP designs were likely achieved in different ways. The PS-FB design uses a cam-post to hold the femur more posteriorly preventing posterior impingement. The external rotation within the CR-RP design was surprising and hasn’t previously been reported. It is likely due to the polyethylene bearing being decoupled from flexion. The findings of this study provide insights into the function of different knee arthroplasty designs in the context during deep kneeling and provide clinicians with a more kinematically informed choice for implant selection and may allow improved management of patients' functional expectations. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):105–112.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3837-3845 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.H. Prins ◽  
B.L. Kaptein ◽  
B.C. Stoel ◽  
D.J.P. Lahaye ◽  
E.R. Valstar

2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derrick S. Ross ◽  
Stephen M. Howell ◽  
Maury L. Hull

Knowledge of anterior–posterior (A-P) tibial contact locations provides an objective assessment of the relative motion of the tibia on the femur following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which can be used to compare the effects of different components, surgical techniques, and alignment goals on knee function in vivo. Both the lowest point method and the penetration method have been used to calculate A-P tibial contact locations using three-dimensional (3D) model to two-dimensional (2D) image registration. The primary objective of this study was to quantify errors in calculating the A-P tibial contact location using the lowest point and penetration methods because the errors in calculating the A-P tibial contact locations using these two methods are unknown. The A-P tibial contact locations were calculated with the two methods and simultaneously measured with a tibial force sensor in ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens with a TKA. Single-plane radiographs of the knee specimens were acquired at 0 deg, 30 deg, 60 deg, and 90 deg of flexion in neutrally, internally, and externally rotated orientations. While the radiographs were exposed, reference A-P tibial contact locations were simultaneously collected using the tibial force sensor to be compared to the calculated A-P tibial contact locations. The overall root-mean-squared-errors (RMSEs) in the A-P tibial contact location calculated with the lowest point method, the penetration method with penetration, and penetration method without penetration were 5.5 mm, 3.6 mm, and 8.9 mm, respectively. The overall RMSE was lowest for the penetration method with penetration, making it the superior method for calculating A-P tibial contact locations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document