315 An Experimental Study on the Effect of Adverse Pressure Gradient on the Mean Flow Field of Turbulent Boundary Layer

2006 ◽  
Vol 2006.44 (0) ◽  
pp. 111-112
Author(s):  
Keisuke OHTA ◽  
Shinsuke MOCHIZUKI ◽  
Takatsugu KAMEDA ◽  
Hideo OSAKA
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Experimental Study ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean

Subsonic Turbulent Flow Past a Planar Fence

1979 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-375
Author(s):  
M. L. Agarwal ◽  
P. K. Pande ◽  
Rajendra Prakash
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Boundary Conditions ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Governing Equations ◽  
Flow Past ◽  
Entire Flow ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Shape And Size

The mean flow past a fence submerged in a turbulent boundary layer is numerically simulated. The governing equations have been simplified by neglecting the convective effects of turbulence and solved numerically using experimental boundary conditions. The information obtained includes the shape and size of the upstream and downstream separation bubbles and the streamline pattern in the entire flow field. General agreement between the simulated and the experimental flow field was found.

519 Mean Flow Quantities of Turbulent Boundary Layer with the Adverse Pressure Gradient

2001 ◽  
Vol 2001.39 (0) ◽  
pp. 197-198
Author(s):  
Kentaro MURAMOTO ◽  
Takatsugu KAMEDA ◽  
Shinsuke MOCHIDUKI ◽  
Hideo OSAKA
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Mean Flow

A supersonic turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient

1990 ◽  
Vol 211 ◽  
pp. 285-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emerick M. Fernando ◽  
Alexander J. Smits
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Pressure Distribution ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Large Scale Structures ◽  
Streamline Curvature ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Scale Structures

This investigation describes the effects of an adverse pressure gradient on a flat plate supersonic turbulent boundary layer (Mf ≈ 2.9, βx ≈ 5.8, Reθ, ref ≈ 75600). Single normal hot wires and crossed wires were used to study the Reynolds stress behaviour, and the features of the large-scale structures in the boundary layer were investigated by measuring space–time correlations in the normal and spanwise directions. Both the mean flow and the turbulence were strongly affected by the pressure gradient. However, the turbulent stress ratios showed much less variation than the stresses, and the essential nature of the large-scale structures was unaffected by the pressure gradient. The wall pressure distribution in the current experiment was designed to match the pressure distribution on a previously studied curved-wall model where streamline curvature acted in combination with bulk compression. The addition of streamline curvature affects the turbulence strongly, although its influence on the mean velocity field is less pronounced and the modifications to the skin-friction distribution seem to follow the empirical correlations developed by Bradshaw (1974) reasonably well.

A turbulent equilibrium boundary layer near separation

1994 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 319-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Egil Skåre ◽  
Per-åge Krogstad
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Diffusion Mechanism ◽  
Gradient Flow ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Energy ◽  
Skin Friction Coefficient ◽  
Wall Region ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean

The experimental results for an equilibrium boundary layer in a strong adverse pressure gradient flow are reported. The measurements show that similarity in the mean flow and the turbulent stresses has been achieved over a substantial streamwise distance where the skin friction coefficient is kept at a low, constant level. Although the Reynolds stress distribution across the layer is entirely different from the flow at zero pressure gradient, the ratios between the different turbulent stress components were found to be similar, showing that the mechanism for distributing the turbulent energy between the different components remains unaffected by the mean flow pressure gradient. Close to the surface the gradient of the mixing length was found to increase from Kl ≈ 0.41 to Kl ≈ 0.78, almost twice as high as for the zero pressure gradient case. Similarity in the triple correlations was also found to be good. The correlations show that there is a considerable diffusion of turbulent energy from the central part of the boundary layer towards the wall. The diffusion mechanism is caused by a second peak in the turbulence production, located at y/δ ≈ 0.45. This production was for the present case almost as strong as the production found near the wall. The energy budget for the turbulent kinetic energy also shows that strong dissipation is not restricted to the wall region, but is significant for most of the layer.

Numerical investigation of the turbulent boundary layer over a bump

1998 ◽  
Vol 362 ◽  
pp. 229-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIAOHUA WU ◽  
KYLE D. SQUIRES
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Subgrid Scale ◽  
Internal Layers ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Eddy Viscosity Model ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Shear Production

Large-eddy simulation (LES) has been used to calculate the flow of a statistically two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer over a bump. Subgrid-scale stresses in the filtered Navier–Stokes equations were closed using the dynamic eddy viscosity model. LES predictions for a range of grid resolutions were compared to the experimental measurements of Webster et al. (1996). Predictions of the mean flow and turbulence intensities are in good agreement with measurements. The resolved turbulent shear stress is in reasonable agreement with data, though the peak is over-predicted near the trailing edge of the bump. Analysis of the flow confirms the existence of internal layers over the bump surface upstream of the summit and along the downstream trailing at plate, and demonstrates that the quasi-step increases in skin friction due to perturbations in pressure gradient and surface curvature selectively enhance near-wall shear production of turbulent stresses and are responsible for the formation of the internal layers. Though the flow experiences a strong adverse pressure gradient along the rear surface, the boundary layer is unique in that intermittent detachment occurring near the wall is not followed by mean-flow separation. Certain turbulence characteristics in this region are similar to those previously reported in instantaneously separating boundary layers. The present investigation also explains the driving mechanism for the surprisingly rapid return to equilibrium over the trailing flat plate found in the measurements of Webster et al. (1996), i.e. the simultaneous uninterrupted development of an inner energy-equilibrium region and the monotonic decay of elevated turbulence shear production away from the wall. LES results were also used to examine response of the dynamic eddy viscosity model. While subgrid-scale dissipation decreases/increases as the turbulence is attenuated/enhanced, the ratio of the (averaged) forward to reverse energy transfers predicted by the model is roughly constant over a significant part of the layer. Model predictions of backscatter, calculated as the percentage of points where the model coefficient is negative, show a rapid recovery downstream similar to the mean-flow and turbulence quantities.

The Mean Flow Quantities in an Equilibrium Boundary Layer Subjected to the Adverse Pressure Gradient

2002 ◽  
Vol 2002.3 (0) ◽  
pp. 75-76
Author(s):  
Shinsuke MOCHIZUKI ◽  
Takanori NAKAMURA ◽  
Kentaro MURAMOTO ◽  
Hideo OSAKA
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Adverse Pressure Gradient ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean

Near-wall measurements in a three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer

1997 ◽  
Vol 350 ◽  
pp. 189-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEBORA A. COMPTON ◽  
JOHN K. EATON
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Shear Stress ◽  
Kinetic Energy ◽  
Turbulent Boundary Layer ◽  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Turbulent Kinetic Energy ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Near Wall

An experiment was performed to measure near-wall velocity and Reynolds stress profiles in a pressure-driven three-dimensional turbulent boundary layer. An initially two-dimensional boundary layer (Reθ≈4000) was exposed to a strong spanwise pressure gradient. At the furthest downstream measurement locations there was also a fairly strong favourable streamwise pressure gradient.Measurements were made using a specially designed near-wall laser-Doppler anemometer (LDA), in addition to conventional methods. The LDA used short focal length optics, a mirror probe suspended in the flow, and side-scatter collection to achieve a measuring volume 35 μm in diameter and approximately 65 μm long.The data presented include mean velocity measurements and Reynolds stresses, all extending well below y+=10, at several profile locations. Terms of the turbulent kinetic energy transport equation are presented at two profile locations. The mean flow is nearly collateral (i.e. W is proportional to U) at the wall. Turbulent kinetic energy is mildly suppressed in the near-wall region and the shear stress components are strongly affected by three-dimensionality. As a result, the ratio of shear stress to turbulent kinetic energy is suppressed throughout most of the boundary layer. The angles of stress and strain are misaligned, except very near the wall (around y+=10) where the angles nearly coincide with the mean flow angle. Three-dimensionality appears to mildly reduce the production of turbulent kinetic energy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document