scholarly journals In situ neutron diffraction under tensile deformation for patented pearlite steels

2004 ◽  
Vol 2004 (0) ◽  
pp. 89-90
Author(s):  
Tomoya Shinozaki ◽  
Satoshi Morooka ◽  
Tetsuya Suzuki ◽  
Yo Tomota
Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Youngsu Kim ◽  
Wookjin Choi ◽  
Hahn Choo ◽  
Ke An ◽  
Ho-Suk Choi ◽  
...  

In situ neutron diffraction was employed to examine the phase transformation behavior of high-Mn steels with different carbon contents (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 wt.%C). With increasing carbon contents from 0.1 C to 0.5 C, the austenite phase fraction among the constituent phases increased from ~66% to ~98%, and stacking fault energy (SFE) increased from ~0.65 to ~16.5 mJ/m2. The 0.1 C and 0.3 C steels underwent phase transformation from γ-austenite to ε-martensite or α’-martensite during tensile deformation. On the other hand, the 0.5 C steel underwent phase transformation only from γ-austenite to ε-martensite. The 0.3 C steel exhibited a low yield strength, a high strain hardening rate, and the smallest elongation. The high strain hardening of the 0.3 C alloy was due to a rapid phase transformation rate from γ-austenite to ε-martensite. The austenite of 0.5 C steel was strengthened by mechanical twinning during loading process, and the twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) effect resulted in a large ductility. The 0.5 wt.% carbon addition stabilized the austenite phase by delaying the onset of the ε-martensite phase transformation.


2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (13) ◽  
pp. 2471-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Harjo ◽  
Y. Tomota ◽  
P. Lukáš ◽  
D. Neov ◽  
M. Vrána ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Tomota ◽  
P. Lukáš ◽  
D. Neov ◽  
S. Harjo ◽  
Y.R. Abe

2011 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 390-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozef Zrník ◽  
Ondrej Muránsky ◽  
Petr Šittner ◽  
E.C. Oliver

The paper presents results of in-situ neutron diffraction experiments aimed on monitoring the phase evolution and load distribution in TRIP steel when subjected to tensile loading. Tensile deformation behaviour of TRIP steel with different initial microstructures showed that the applied tensile load is redistributed at the yield point and the harder retained austenite (Feγ) bears larger load then ferrite (Feα) matrix. After load partioning is finished, macroscopic yielding comes through simultaneous activity of the martensite transformation (in the austenite) and plastic deformation process in ferrite. The steel with higher volume fraction of retained austenite and less stronger ferrite appears to be a better TRIP steel having efficient structure for better plasticity purpose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document