Correlates of Violence History Among Injured Patients in an Urban Emergency Department

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen A. Walton ◽  
R. M. Cunningham ◽  
S. T. Chermack ◽  
R. Maio ◽  
F. C. Blow ◽  
...  
CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S70
Author(s):  
J.R. Brubacher ◽  
R. Yip ◽  
A. Trajkovski ◽  
C. Lam ◽  
G. Sutton ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cycling as a form of active transportation is popular in many urban communities. However, little is known about the prevalence and circumstances of cycling injuries, particularly injuries resulting from single bicycle crashes which are not recorded in road trauma surveillance systems based on police crash reports. This study aimed to examine the profile and circumstances of cycling injuries seen in an urban emergency department (ED). Methods: This was a cross-sectional historical chart review study. All injured patients attending our ED are electronically flagged according to mechanism of injury. We reviewed the medical charts of all ED visits in 2015 that were flagged as “Cyclist Injury” or “Fall” to identify all cyclists who were injured while travelling on public roads (including sidewalks). Off road injuries were excluded. Results: In 2015, a total of 6450 ED presentations were flagged as cyclist injury (n=694) or fall (n=5756), and 667 cycling injuries met our inclusion criteria. Of these, 73 (11%) were admitted to hospital. The most common mechanisms of injury were fall from bicycle (51%), crash into stationary object (16%), and collisions with moving motor vehicles (25%). Potential contributing factors included alcohol or drug impairment (11%), road hazards (9%), avoidance manoeuvre (5%) and dooring (3%), although the cause of the crash was generally poorly documented in the medical charts. The most common injured body regions were upper extremity (55%) followed by head and neck (34%). Most injuries were abrasions/lacerations and fractures. Conclusion: Two thirds of cyclist injuries in this series were caused by single bicycle incidents, events not captured in official road trauma statistics which are based on police crash reports. The large majority of injured cyclists were treated and released from the ED. In most cases, the cause of the crash was poorly documented. This data highlights the limitations of using police crash reports or hospital admission records for road trauma surveillance and the significant knowledge gap in our understanding of causative factors leading to cycling injuries.


2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 12 ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Asher L Mandel ◽  
Thomas Bove ◽  
Amisha D Parekh ◽  
Paris Datillo ◽  
Joseph Bove Jr ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e037238
Author(s):  
Mineji Hayakawa ◽  
Takashi Tagami ◽  
Hiroaki IIjima ◽  
Daisuke Kudo ◽  
Kazuhiko Sekine ◽  
...  

IntroductionResuscitation using blood products is critical during the acute postinjury period. However, the optimal target haemoglobin (Hb) levels have not been adequately investigated. With the restrictive transfusion strategy for critically injured patients (RESTRIC) trial, we aim to compare the restrictive and liberal red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies.Methods and analysisThis is a cluster-randomised, crossover, non-inferiority trial of patients with severe trauma at 22 hospitals that have been randomised in a 1:1 ratio based on the use of a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy with target Hb levels of 70–90 or 100–120 g/L, respectively, during the first year. Subsequently, after 1-month washout period, another transfusion strategy will be applied for an additional year. RBC transfusion requirements are usually unclear on arrival at the emergency department. Therefore, patients with severe bleeding, which could lead to haemorrhagic shock, will be included in the trial based on the attending physician’s judgement. Each RBC transfusion strategy will be applied until 7 days postadmission to the hospital or discharge from the intensive care unit. The outcomes measured will include the 28-day survival rate after arrival at the emergency department (primary), the cumulative amount of blood transfused, event-free days and frequency of transfusion-associated lung injury and organ failure (secondary). Demonstration of the non-inferiority of restrictive transfusion will emphasise its clinical advantages.Ethics and disseminationThe trial will be performed according to the Japanese and International Ethical guidelines. It has been approved by the Ethics Committee of each participating hospital and The Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma (JAST). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients or their representatives. The results of the trial will be disseminated to the participating hospitals and board-certified educational institutions of JAST, submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication, and presented at congresses.Trial registration numberUMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000034405. Registered 8 October 2018.


2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 2781-2788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Mura ◽  
Elisabetta Serra ◽  
Franco Marinangeli ◽  
Sebastiano Patti ◽  
Mario Musu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
James S. Ford ◽  
Ivan Shevchyk ◽  
Joseph Yoon ◽  
Tasleem Chechi ◽  
Stephanie Voong ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume 10 ◽  
pp. 171-176
Author(s):  
Giorgos Papoutsis ◽  
Sylvana Papoutsi ◽  
Jolanta Klukowska-Rötzler ◽  
Benoît Schaller ◽  
Aristomenis Exadaktylos

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document